It hasn't even been a year since they joined, has it? Changes are going to take time and I don't think any other companies will fully embrace it until we see that Apple can really make the improvements work long-term. I'm honestly curious how long it took for other apparel brands to follow Nike's lead as well.
They've worked with them for over a year, have implemented changes before joining the FLA (just look at the wage raises and OT reductions in 2010 and 2011 following the suicides--Apple joined FLA in 2012). The other companies have not followed that lead in the 2 years since. That's why I said Samsung 2012 is still worse than Foxconn 2010.
Adidas, Eddie Bauer, Levi Strauss and Co, Liz Claiborne, Nike, Phillips-Van Heusen, and Reebok all joined the FLA
at the same time.
Of course we shouldn't expect it but I don't think that's quite the reality. I guarantee you people respond differently to Samsung using "slave" labour versus Apple. Would you be shocked if the products that Walmart carries were made with slave labour? Like I said, I think image has a lot to do with what people expect from companies.
I actively work in China labor rights so I'm familiar with what goes on at WalMart suppliers. I do what I can to help improve labor rights at those companies.
Well yeah, of course. everyone should push for better standards. Should Samsung or whomever else get heat for producing in China under poor conditions as well? Of course.
All I'm saying is it makes sense to target the market leader. There's a reason why Microsoft is THE target for software monopolies, why Nike is THE target for child labour, why Walmart is THE target for displacing local stores/low wages/etc.
That's a false comparison. I think they've targeted Microsoft fairly--there's no other OS monopoly.
Nike was targeted
along with other companies. Even Kathie Lee Gifford's clothing line was targeted. There's a reason why Bill Clinton's task force on apparel manufacturers was not focused on Nike, and why all those companies joined the FLA at the same time.
I think big box stores are targeted pretty equally in terms of the amount of impact. There are more WalMarts, so there's more against them, but Home Depots and other big box retailers are targeted each time they try to open up.
Nobody says, "Hey, let's ignore this smaller big box retailer, we should just single out WalMart, they're the biggest!"
Not excusing anything. I'm saying Apple is the correct company to target. If I'm a betting man, I put all my money on Apple being THE company that'll change things (if it ever happens).
They can only change things in their line. They have been putting in changes since at least 2010. I don't see anyone following in line. It's time to stop giving other companies a pass, especially if they employ more workers and have more power to directly implement changes.
If you are holding up Nike as the example, its a false example, since tons of companies were and still are targeted as well, including things as small as the Kathie Lee clothing line or as big as Adidas.
If I'm a betting man, I say we can get more companies to change if we focus on more companies. Focusing on Apple only gets Apple to change.