Taking money to plug a company is a cardinal sin of journalism and can even be against the law. Yet, astro-turfing — spinning paid opinion as popular sentiment — remains a thriving trade all the same.
The phenomenon has been on display again during this week’s epic intellectual property trial between Google vs Oracle. Florian Mueller, a self-proclaimed patent expert funded by both Oracle and Microsoft, has been issuing a flurry of biased blog posts that don’t mention his paymasters. (His risible excuse for the shameless plumping is that he’s an “analyst”).
Microsoft is hardly the first company to astroturf but it does deserve special mention for being a master of the craft. As well as its patent puppet, the company has a roster of other hired mouths. These include law professor James Grimmelmann who it paid to collect criticism of the Google book settlement and ICOMP a group devoted to smearing its rivals in the European Parliament. A number of mom-and-pop businesses suing Google for antitrust, it turns out, are also tied to Microsoft.This type of professional distortion may strike some as unethical. There is also the question of whether it should be illegal.
You are a heathen and you will burn in the firey pits of Hell for all eternity!Am I a robot for liking xbox?
Worse than actual, cult-like behavior?Anti XBOX dweebs are a special breed. Grown men with a lot of strange opinions.
There are many aspects and tenets to Microsoft Evangelism but of relevance, it purports creating a cult-like legion of supporters and followers, VIP or otherwise that promote Microsoft products and monopolistic practices with a cult like fervor - that regards MS competitors, direct or indirect as war participants that must be extinguished by any and all available means.
MS Evangelism is literally a philosophy of corporate religion, where the consumers, specially the hardcore, are the faithful, and guided by faith to the altar of Microsoft and its products. Microsoft being the church while microsoft employees and vips are the clergy
Riky how much are you getting lol
Sony fans are paid.
How else do you account for so many of them trashing backwards compatibility and saying it’s not needed and is a waste of resources.
Who needs BC when you can pay $120 a year for imaginary PS classics?Sony fans are paid.
How else do you account for so many of them trashing backwards compatibility and saying it’s not needed and is a waste of resources.
They sure do like drip feeding feeding those, don’t they?Who needs BC when you can pay $120 a year for imaginary PS classics?
With all those bots around I wonder which company do they NOT champion or praise to heaven. This is not an exclusive Xbox/MS thing.
Sony Too™Sony fans are paid.
How else do you account for so many of them trashing backwards compatibility and saying it’s not needed and is a waste of resources.
Sony fans are paid.
How else do you account for so many of them trashing backwards compatibility and saying it’s not needed and is a waste of resources.
Am I a robot for liking xbox?
Theyre fighting the war with bodies and bots on the ground. It's going to come to a point, if it hasn't already, where the assumption will be that you're talking to one the large majority of the time.Neogaf: It is a welll-documented fact that Microsoft has employed Astro-turfing as one arm of its “evangelising” program. Here’s someone who says, in support of Microsoft’s own words on the matter, that it still happens today in order to advertise the Xbox program.
Half of the Xbox fans on Neogaf: WHY ARE YOU ATTACKING ME???
Here’s a “thought experiment” for you all.
Assume that there are shills on this site, from both companies. People who will defend one platform AND attack the other, relentlessly, beyond the bounds of logical argument. Really, it doesn’t matter if they’re actually paid or not - just assume that such people exist.
Can you name who these would likely be for Xbox?
Can you name who these would likely be for Sony?
I think, even for the genuine die-hard fans, it is a lot easier to come up with a list for the one than the other.
(Note: I’m not actually asking people to “name and shame” - as I said, it’s just a thought experiment, so just think it.)
Neogaf: It is a welll-documented fact that Microsoft has employed Astro-turfing as one arm of its “evangelising” program. Here’s someone who says, in support of Microsoft’s own words on the matter, that it still happens today in order to advertise the Xbox program.
Oh look, me pointing out how to spot shills got you to stop posting meme gifs and actually respond.Who is this someone exactly an why should his twitter rambles matter more than any other twatters? Does it matter more to you because it's conforming to your own confirmation bias ?
Also, the answer to your hypothetical thought experiment is in the post very next to yours.
Oh look, me pointing out how to spot shills got you to stop posting meme gifs and actually respond.
And, in line with my prediction in this very thread, you attempt to deflect. Again.
You ignore the actual point of my post - that this is a well-known MS tactic - and attacks the source of this particular comment, with… absolutely nothing.
And still, no reason given whatsoever not to believe the underlying argument.
You’ve long since shown your colours, now you’re just running around naked.
Sony fans are paid.
How else do you account for so many of them trashing backwards compatibility and saying it’s not needed and is a waste of resources.
There was no answer, and you’re back to avoiding and deflecting… and, now, projecting.You asked a question, I answered and you immediately went into turtle-defense mode.
There was no answer, and you’re back to avoiding and deflecting… and, now, projecting.
I’m defensive?
Not much with the TV he's using.Riky how much are you getting lol
Huh? Fucking weirdo’s.
Citing the tweet from a rando twitter user whose tweet history is littered with nothing but anti MS / anti acquisition tweets
Asking to name names to start list / bait-war but covering your tracks at the end by saying "I'm not actually asking to do that"
Continuously emphasizing that only one company does astroturfing and accusing anyone who says otherwise as "equivocating"
Your entire 'offer of debate' here is a sham because its based on a premise written by someone who has a very clear bias against MS/Xbox and it's pretty visible in his public communication, so anyone who says anything other than what your confirmation bias seeks, you will refer them back to the OP in a viciously dishonest cycle.
;dr, yeah, deflecting/defensive/bad acting, insert your preferred adjective.
Lobbyists Tied to Microsoft Wrote Citizens' Letters
Letters purportedly written by at least two dead people landed on the desk of Utah Atty. Gen.www.latimes.com
You don't even need to be alive to be used by Microsoft:
To assist it in the grass-roots campaign, Microsoft turned to two of the nation’s top political advocacy groups: Boston-based Dewey Square Group, co-founded by Al Gore campaigner Michael Whouley, and Phoenix-based DCI/New Media, led by Republican strategist Tom Synhorst.
One crop of letters began rolling into state offices this spring.
Quietly distributed by another Microsoft-supported group, Citizens Against Government Waste, those letters were identical except for the signature.
Minnesota Atty. Gen. Mike Hatch said he got about 300 of those. “It’s sleazy,” he said. “This is not a company that appears to be bothered by ethical boundaries.”
State officials said they won’t be swayed by the effort, and Hatch responded with his own mailings to the senders, explaining his position.
Some recipients wrote back by hand, apologizing for passing along the Microsoft-inspired letters. “I sure was misled,” one wrote.
Utah officials found that two prefab letters from Citizens Against Government Waste bore the typed names of dead people. Those names had been crossed out by family members who signed for them. And another letter came from “Tuscon, Utah,” a city that doesn’t exist.
…which is exactly why I never mentioned him, and instead presented numerous pieces of evidence establishing a pattern of behaviour and formalising if this process. The offer is not a sham just because there is no counter-point to be made.
Neogaf: It is a welll-documented fact that Microsoft has employed Astro-turfing as one arm of its “evangelising” program. Here’s someone who says, in support of Microsoft’s own words on the matter, that it still happens today in order to advertise the Xbox program.
Yep, I did mention him, although I was pointing out what the responses were to this thread and not using him as the basis for my own arguments.Anyone who disagrees with you is lying or deflecting, excellent way to ask for a factual debate.
PS, since you say you're happy to provide evidence, whose here defending one platform while relentlessly attacking the others ? The one being defended and the one being RELENTLESSLY attacked doesn't matter, give examples from either camp of users who are doing that,
…and no, I’m not calling out names. I’ve done that to a degree already, more than I’m comfortable with in retrospect. It is weird that you’re asking me to turn this into the kind of witch-hunt you seem to be accusing me of, but I’m not interested in playing whatever game you’re trying to solicit here.
Completely irrelevant to gaming. Wouldn’t matter the PS4 slims blu-ray player couldn’t play DVDs, or movies from before 2013.I remember when the Xbox One S launched and Xbox One was winning NPDs. Xbox fans were saying it was a mistake that PlayStation 4 slim skipped out on the 4K BluRay player and a lack of BC..
Well, it seems like it really didn't have an impact at all.
BC wasn't trashed, Xbox fans were hyping it up as some huge feature that was required. The fact is most people didn't care.
For those still following along, this is all me foolishly playing adamsapple ‘s game.You asked other users to make a list of names, you said you are happy to provide evidence. I have only asked you to follow through.
Don't say its a witch hunt if you want others to do the dirty work for you
For those still following along, this is all me foolishly playing adamsapple ‘s game.
His aim here is to take the focus off MS - he refuses to discuss their actions, contemporary or historical. He tried to deflect attention onto Sony, and when called out, he’s now trying to shift the argument so that it’s about me.
Anything to say about MS’s astroturfing here? I did ask that question after all.
BC wasn't trashed, Xbox fans were hyping it up as some huge feature that was required. The fact is most people didn't care.
Look whose deflecting now ,
and to answer your question. Nope.
this would explain lot of weird charade
Not much with the TV he's using.
Deflecting by… bringing the topic back to the thread title?
Again, for those playing along at home: this is the kind of behaviour to look out for if you want to spot a shill.
A lot less than all those people with a script claiming VRR was a bad thing until Sony decided it was actually a great idea.
I mean, it’s pretty obvious
I mean, it’s pretty obvious
It's not because I'm giving you a history of when things started and what was the narrative back then.Completely irrelevant to gaming. Wouldn’t matter the PS4 slims blu-ray player couldn’t play DVDs, or movies from before 2013.
What does telling this story accomplish?
I never said it was trash. I'm telling you what happened and it wasn't that PS fans were calling it trash as you're making it out to be. What was ACTUALLY being said is that people weren't buying these consoles for BC and Xbox fans wanted you to believe it was some must-have feature that was important when it was not.Being able to play generations of some of the most critically acclaimed and beloved games is never trash. And there were always a few of us PS fans hoping it would come soon.
Sony doesn’t even have stated forwards compatibility plan. Wouldn’t it be awesome if you couldn’t play Driveclub or Gravity Rush HD on the PS6 without a patch that will never come?
Defense Force, was it?
Do you really believe it’s difficult to find Sony full time warriors here? Who by their own admission only play a couple games each year, but argue endlessly here?Neogaf: It is a welll-documented fact that Microsoft has employed Astro-turfing as one arm of its “evangelising” program. Here’s someone who says, in support of Microsoft’s own words on the matter, that it still happens today in order to advertise the Xbox program.
Half of the Xbox fans on Neogaf: WHY ARE YOU ATTACKING ME???
Here’s a “thought experiment” for you all.
Assume that there are shills on this site, from both companies. People who will defend one platform AND attack the other, relentlessly, beyond the bounds of logical argument. Really, it doesn’t matter if they’re actually paid or not - just assume that such people exist.
Can you name who these would likely be for Xbox?
Can you name who these would likely be for Sony?
I think, even for the genuine die-hard fans, it is a lot easier to come up with a list for the one than the other.
(Note: I’m not actually asking people to “name and shame” - as I said, it’s just a thought experiment, so just think it.)