IncandescentPrecept
Banned
At the end of the day, to stop this cycle, one has to come up and say "we give up". For the sake of protecting their people. Do Palestinians have land of their own?
Okay ...
#Ether
What honor killing? Six Israeli Jews were arrested as suspects.
The discovery on June 30th of the bodies of three Jewish teenagers, kidnapped while hitchhiking home from bible college to a settlement south of Jerusalem, was followed two days later by the apparent revenge killing of a Palestinian. Within days, riots that followed the murders had escalated to volleys of rocket fire from Gaza, which have been met by Israeli strikes.
[...]
The escalation has demolished an uneasy peace. Safe behind their walls and the protective umbrella of the Iron Dome anti-missile system, many Israelis had begun to forget about security. Political party leaders focused on economic affairs. Whenever Palestinians were uppity, Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, promoted “conflict management”, a euphemism for muddling through.
Suddenly, the centre-right ground that Mr Netanyahu has dominated by tinkering and sidestepping big decisions for five years is slipping from under him. “Mr Netanyahu has lost the greatest asset of his tenure—security and calm,” says Ofer Zalzberg, an Israeli political analyst. “If he doesn’t regain it, he will fall.” The country is polarising between those who want a peace settlement and those who support military action. A poll conducted on July 2nd, as tensions began to bubble over, showed parties on the far-right and left had benefited. The small left-wing party, Meretz, doubled its support.
On July 7th, as the prime minister vacillated, Avigdor Lieberman, the foreign minister and Mr Netanyahu’s former chief of staff, ended a partnership with the prime minister’s Likud party, taking his ten parliamentarians with him and calling for a heavy offensive against Hamas. Reluctantly, and in part to shore up his right-wing flank, Mr Netanyahu launched a campaign of air strikes the next day, named “Operation Protective Edge”. Public pressure for a ground assault is mounting. “Bibi’s afraid,” says a Tel Aviv bus driver, who flies the colours of his infantry regiment above a swaying fluffy doll pinned in the cabin of his bus.
[...]
http://www.economist.com/news/middl...rked-military-escalation-costing-dozens-lives
An article on the propaganda war. Detailed numbers on the kille present in the article too.
http://972mag.com/blame-israel-and-hamas-both-for-gazas-civilian-deaths/93351/
EDIT: Arghhh Scullibundo please quote your post. And not too be rude or something but you're not really bringing anything of value to the thread with a post like that.
EDIT:
It does. I have seen the 'Hamas Mickey Mouse' footage. It's so disgusting.
Dismissing the source is a familiar tactic and akin to dismissing any video from Gaza as 'Pallywood'. Where else do you expect to find the evidence? Who else would be filming an aborted IDF airstrike, come on.Recall that I asked you for the source of your evidence, and you decided not to do that. How can I address your evidence if you don't show it to me?
EDIT: Oh, you linked to the IDF's murder porn youtube page. I am very familiar with this channel. Great gems on here for anyone wanting nothing but videos of aircraft bombings. You'll have to excuse me if I don't take my evidence from the exact people we're trying to find objective information about. Are you for real with this?
Here you go:
http://online.wsj.com/articles/civilian-deaths-shine-light-on-israeli-tactic-1404955844
Then which great power has taken the place of a would-be monolithic international community? There is already a globalized narrative that enables Israel to do what it does without repercussions.
The three Israelis were kidnapped and killed. Their murders have not been found.
The "honor killing" was the six arrested, this is how its been described. Two events leading up to this that were related to the current situation, a pretext for the airstrikes and increased rocket fire.
edit:
There is a report that show the iron dome has reduced economic costs of the rocket attacks. I'm not sure how precise it is, there are limitations to each platform when it comes to interception. I've heard from 5%-90% success rate. David's Sling is coming and there are more devices on the books.I just like to point out the Iron Dome is not really good. The truth is the Palestinian rockets aren't that effective. However, their made to be worse than what Israel has.
At the end of the day, to stop this cycle, one has to come up and say "we give up". For the sake of protecting their people. Do Palestinians have land of their own?
There is a report that show the iron dome has reduced economic costs of the rocket attacks. I'm not sure how precise it is, there are limitations to each platform when it comes to interception. I've heard from 5%-90% success rate. David's Sling is coming and there are more devices on the books.
SIEGEL: They say it was intercepted by the Iron Dome missile defense system. How would - how successful is that system, in your view?
POSTOL: We can tell, for sure, from video images and even photographs that the Iron Dome system is not working very well at all. It - my guess is maybe 5 percent of the time - could be even lower.
POSTOL: In part, this is an intended game on the part of the adversary. You know, if you can create - if you can intentionally force the Israelis to kill a lot of noncombatants, that's good for your campaign. It makes them look worse. It makes the Israelis look worse.
Why can't Israelis give up? What are Palestinians giving up if they have nothing?
Why don't say this about those Syrian "rebels" or Libyan "rebels" who were losing to Ghadaffi before Nato bombed him.
It's funny how Israel gets special treatment not afforded to other countries.
I can accept that, but will point-out its a guess. Early reports had it at 15% [edit: it was 33.3% 5/15] from the IDF. Even if so low, could the redundancy of the network not be increased so that an intercept was much more probable? What is the cost of perpetual war? Would not twenty times the number of intercept systems surely be cheaper than a conflict that potentially goes from Gaza to the other neighbors of Israel?Yeah but I think the MIT professor is the best authority on this:
http://www.npr.org/2014/07/09/330183774/the-rockets-from-hamas-and-the-iron-dome-that-could-use-patching
I'm asking about whether Palestinians having land because I thought maybe they all live in a strip of land that Israel is claiming as their own. Because if that's the case, then they have no choice but to fight if they're being attacked.
I don't know anything Syria and Libya.
In other words, stop making assumptions and getting defensive.
Dismissing the source is a familiar tactic and akin to dismissing any video from Gaza as 'Pallywood'. Where else do you expect to find the evidence? Who else would be filming an aborted IDF airstrike, come on.
There is plenty of evidence that Hamas encourages civilians to act as human shields, if that would be less objectionable?
I can accept that, but will point-out its a guess. Early reports had it at 15% [edit: it was 33.3% 5/15] from the IDF. Even if so low, could the redundancy of the network not be increased so that an intercept was much more probable? What is the cost of perpetual war? Would not twenty times the number of intercept systems surely be cheaper than a conflict that potentially goes from Gaza to the other neighbors of Israel?
Silly you. There is no free press instead it's the Hamas distributing those pics, videos and spreading the propaganda.You said Israel does everything in their power to prevent unnecessary casualties. You linked a video to substantiate this. It's impossible to tell what I'm looking at without the IDF telling me. I posted a link from a free press to counter your argument about Israel doing everything in their power to prevent unnecessary casualties. What does Hamas being shitty have to do with this?
Or in other words, you dismissed it because the IDF are explaining what is happening in the video. You immediately dismiss it because you assume the IDF would be lying.You said Israel does everything in their power to prevent unnecessary casualties. You linked a video to substantiate this. It's impossible to tell what I'm looking at without the IDF telling me. I posted a link from a free press to counter your argument about Israel doing everything in their power to prevent unnecessary casualties. What does Hamas being shitty have to do with this?
You said Israel does everything in their power to prevent unnecessary casualties. You linked a video to substantiate this. It's impossible to tell what I'm looking at without the IDF telling me. I posted a link from a free press to counter your argument about Israel doing everything in their power to prevent unnecessary casualties. What does Hamas being shitty have to do with this?
I accepted it, its in the original range I gave, and pointed out its a guess. It wasn't a guess that debunked the Patriot missiles.The same professor successfully debunked the claims of Patriot missile successes during he Gulf War so he has a decent track record.
I accepted it, its in the original range I gave, and pointed out its a guess. It wasn't a guess that debunked the Patriot missiles.
Here's the deal: when Israeli babies die because of rocket attacks the Palestinians have a photo album of dead babies to put up in return. Maybe, just maybe, if the approach was less heavy-handed then there could come a day when anyone firing a rocket would be hunted down by either side as an obstacle to peace. Its total destruction or there needs to be a common goal to work toward.
So IDF calls up the Hamas and tells them they are bombing their house. Hamas get to run away and the IDF decides to bombs the kids anyways? That's a great fucking plan.Or in other words, you dismissed it because the IDF are explaining what is happening in the video. You immediately dismiss it because you assume the IDF would be lying.
It is undisputed that Hamas not only put innocents at risk by placing their weapons and command centres shoulder to shoulder with civilian homes, schools and hospitals but also encourage civilians to actively become human shields. The IDF have numerous videos that substantiate their claims that in such cases they - at least sometimes - abandon attacks when aware of such shields. You can be skeptical but your disdain for an IDF youtube channel is not itself a reason to dismiss the evidence. I would be happy to be proved wrong if you have evidence that these videos are in anyway doctored or do not show what hey purport to say.
And again, the fact that Hamas use this tactic is acknowledgement that Israel would like to avoid civilian casualties. It is a calculated move to protect their military installations. Either it works and the IDF does try to avoid casualties, or it doesn't work and Hamas is throwing more and more innocents into the fire and hold responsibility for those deaths.
Or in other words, you dismissed it because the IDF are explaining what is happening in the video. You immediately dismiss it because you assume the IDF would be lying.
It is undisputed that Hamas not only put innocents at risk by placing their weapons and command centres shoulder to shoulder with civilian homes, schools and hospitals but also encourage civilians to actively become human shields. The IDF have numerous videos that substantiate their claims that in such cases they - at least sometimes - abandon attacks when aware of such shields. You can be skeptical but your disdain for an IDF youtube channel is not itself a reason to dismiss the evidence. I would be happy to be proved wrong if you have evidence that these videos are in anyway doctored or do not show what hey purport to say.
And again, the fact that Hamas use this tactic is acknowledgement that Israel would like to avoid civilian casualties. It is a calculated move to protect their military installations. Either it works and the IDF does try to avoid casualties, or it doesn't work and Hamas is throwing more and more innocents into the fire and hold responsibility for those deaths.
Or in other words, you dismissed it because the IDF are explaining what is happening in the video. You immediately dismiss it because you assume the IDF would be lying.
It is undisputed that Hamas not only put innocents at risk by placing their weapons and command centres shoulder to shoulder with civilian homes, schools and hospitals but also encourage civilians to actively become human shields. The IDF have numerous videos that substantiate their claims that in such cases they - at least sometimes - abandon attacks when aware of such shields. You can be skeptical but your disdain for an IDF youtube channel is not itself a reason to dismiss the evidence. I would be happy to be proved wrong if you have evidence that these videos are in anyway doctored or do not show what hey purport to say.
And again, the fact that Hamas use this tactic is acknowledgement that Israel would like to avoid civilian casualties. It is a calculated move to protect their military installations. Either it works and the IDF does try to avoid casualties, or it doesn't work and Hamas is throwing more and more innocents into the fire and hold responsibility for those deaths.
Or in other words, you dismissed it because the IDF are explaining what is happening in the video. You immediately dismiss it because you assume the IDF would be lying.
It is undisputed that Hamas not only put innocents at risk by placing their weapons and command centres shoulder to shoulder with civilian homes, schools and hospitals but also encourage civilians to actively become human shields. The IDF have numerous videos that substantiate their claims that in such cases they - at least sometimes - abandon attacks when aware of such shields. You can be skeptical but your disdain for an IDF youtube channel is not itself a reason to dismiss the evidence. I would be happy to be proved wrong if you have evidence that these videos are in anyway doctored or do not show what hey purport to say.
And again, the fact that Hamas use this tactic is acknowledgement that Israel would like to avoid civilian casualties. It is a calculated move to protect their military installations. Either it works and the IDF does try to avoid casualties, or it doesn't work and Hamas is throwing more and more innocents into the fire and hold responsibility for those deaths.
A group of young men from officer training in the Israeli army (IDF) was in May sent to East Jerusalem. The trip was part of the IDF's training program, but organized by the right-wing Elad organization, which works to promote the proportion of Jewish residents in the city's Arab neighborhoods. As part of the program, students were taken to the Mount of
Olives, where different settler rabbis gave presentations. It describes the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.
The newspaper describes how Elad uses four million Israeli shekels (just over six million Danish kroner, ed.) every year on management courses for the Israeli army. And it is an investment like this, which is one of the reasons why more and more talk about a merger between the Israeli military and settlers in the West Bank, explains Associate Professor of History at Roskilde University, James Feldt.
"Since the 1960s, some rabbis in the West Bank taught that the Palestinians were the enemy, and urged the young settlers to make vandaliserende actions," he says, but points out that the army and the settlers previously shared interests, they are today coalesced.
"Many military activities are in the settlements, and there has been an integration of the settlements, which makes it difficult to distinguish them from the military and politics. The right of national governments has created a symbiosis between the military and the national religious Zionism. "
He is backed by a professor of anthropology and director of the Israeli Committee Against House Demolitions (the Israeli Committee Against Demolition of Houses, ed.) Jeff Halper.
"When the government lets the rabbis teach in the army, it's that they want the soldiers to understand the settlers' motives, so they can work together. Compared with other countries, the Israeli army is not neutral, it is a tool the government uses to implement its policies in the West Bank, "he said.
Look. A lot of people in IDF is fucking scum. Loads of racist settler sympathizing scum that would love to see Palestinian dies.
You gotta be honest though. It's an IDF filmed video. It's going to be narrated and shown in an way that puts IDF in a good light.
That's why they have an IDF channel. It's just propaganda in other words.
Look. A lot of people in IDF is fucking scum. Loads of racist settler sympathizing scum that would love to see Palestinian dies. Soul is one example. Theres loads of videos showing their... what should I call it... unprofessional behaviour. So many videos that it can't be brushed off as a single bad apple or two.
Can you post some sources on the evidence that Hamas actively uses civilian shields and such (other than IDF-channels of course) ?
I wouldn't be surprised it's true. I just want confirmation for myself.
And I think again we're running in circles. Instead of discussing why IDF is killing civilians, we must discuss the reason for the killings started. Why did this Operation "Protective Edge" start ?
Why is the Israeli Army attacking Gaza in this operation ? Did Hamas kill those 3 boys ?
Is there any proof for this ?
Don't hold back, man.
If facts are propaganda then... Ok. Would you like to comment on anything in that video which could be untrue/ faked? Or is anything coming from Israel automatically a lie, or null and void?
The Israeli Deputy speaker of the Knesset posts on his Facebook page that called IDF murders.
https://www.facebook.com/JewishLeadership/posts/10152515953938058
How is this democratic?
Most of the Jewish public in Israel supports the establishment of an apartheid regime in Israel if it formally annexes the West Bank.
A majority also explicitly favors discrimination against the state's Arab citizens, a survey shows.
. . .
The majority of the Jewish public, 59 percent, wants preference for Jews over Arabs in admission to jobs in government ministries. Almost half the Jews, 49 percent, want the state to treat Jewish citizens better than Arab ones; 42 percent don't want to live in the same building with Arabs and 42 percent don't want their children in the same class with Arab children.
A third of the Jewish public wants a law barring Israeli Arabs from voting for the Knesset and a large majority of 69 percent objects to giving 2.5 million Palestinians the right to vote if Israel annexes the West Bank.
A sweeping 74 percent majority is in favor of separate roads for Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank. A quarter - 24 percent - believe separate roads are "a good situation" and 50 percent believe they are "a necessary situation."
Almost half - 47 percent - want part of Israel's Arab population to be transferred to the Palestinian Authority and 36 percent support transferring some of the Arab towns from Israel to the PA, in exchange for keeping some of the West Bank settlements.
Although the territories have not been annexed, most of the Jewish public (58 percent ) already believes Israel practices apartheid against Arabs. Only 31 percent think such a system is not in force here. Over a third (38 percent ) of the Jewish public wants Israel to annex the territories with settlements on them, while 48 percent object.
I would like to add something worthwhile to the discussion, but any imput from the outside is absolutely fruitless. International condemnation means nothing when the parties involved are entwined in a never-ending war that neither side wants to back out of in fear of one or the other losing territory. Admittadly, Israel is the dominant party here, but in their minds they are just as maganilized as Palestinians, so when you have two countries that think they have to fight or do, then there isn;t a lot we -meaning those outside of the area- can do.
I doubt that. They have Air Force, Navy, tanks, heavy weaponry, state of the art armor and automatic weapons, sophisticated Missile defense systems, a full standing army with command and control, even nuclear capability, along with billions in our taxpayer money sent to them every year. Besides that, a complete and utter control of US Congress, western politicians and a highly biased mainstream media on their side. There is no way you can even presume to think you are marginalized. If you do, you should be in a mental asylum.I would like to add something worthwhile to the discussion, but any imput from the outside is absolutely fruitless. International condemnation means nothing when the parties involved are entwined in a never-ending war that neither side wants to back out of in fear of one or the other losing territory. Admittadly, Israel is the dominant party here, but in their minds they are just as maganilized as Palestinians, so when you have two countries that think they have to fight or do, then there isn;t a lot we -meaning those outside of the area- can do.
Israel is the dominant party here, but in their minds they are just as maganilized as Palestinians, so when you have two countries that think they have to fight or die, then there isn't a lot we -meaning those outside of the area- can do.
It's amazing how many people believe Israel is the dominant party... they're surrounded by countries that don't recognize their existence, and who have invaded them on more than one occasion with the intent to dismantle their country, and have formed a bloc against them at the U.N. to constantly try to delegitimize them and sow hatred of them. There are 3 times more arabs in Egypt alone then there are Jews in the world... of course they feel vulnerable. Palestinians are arabs, it's how they've identified themselves for decades before the contrived "Palestinian" label was attached to them as though they were a distinct people from, say, Jordanians. Israel is the only Jewish state, whereas there are a dozen arab states, which vastly outnumber the Jews military. Israel has much more at stake, their right to self-determination as a people. Arabs have several states in which to live as a dominant majority (many states which bar Jews from being citizens at all). Let's put things into proper perspective.
I doubt that. They have Air Force, Navy, tanks, heavy weaponry, state of the art armor and automatic weapons, sophisticated Missile defense systems, a full standing army with command and control, even nuclear capability, along with billions in our taxpayer money sent to them every year. Besides that, a complete and utter control of US Congress, western politicians and a highly biased mainstream media on their side. There is no way you can even presume to think you are marginalized. If you do, you should be in a mental asylum.
Israels problems are not a contemporary concern rather a bi-product of deep-seated Jewish trauma, the response to which was to arm itself to the teeth, become an incredibly aggressive country and sustaining the myth of victimhood and goodness.5 (Abarbanel, 2009)
Psychotherapist Avigail Abarbanel recognises Israels reaction to trauma - becoming heavily armed and decisively aggressive - as being a similar response as that by individuals who have been traumatised respond: becoming very powerful and intimidating, forming the capacity to never be hurt again.
Living with this reaction to trauma perpetuates inner conflicts, leads to isolation and invites animosity from others. (Abarbanel, 2009)
Trauma ends up becoming part of the suffers identity and, in this case, through collective memory, the nations collective identity. Identity, the way someone deems they are defined, is unlikely to be changed and to have an identity based on the experience of trauma creates a world view that is mostly negative and totally uncompromising, becoming about us and them.
. . .
Ben Netanyahu, a statesman who has built his career on being an alarmist. (Levy, 2012) has a consistent rhetoric against those who seek to destroy Israel, the Prime Ministers catchphrase: We are on the brink of another Holocaust16. Early in his political career he warned of yet provoked Palestinian terrorism17 and more recently has focussed on Iran: fear mongering through a relentless and repetitive narrative technique,
christening isolated or provoked incidents as trends.
This climate of fear, one disproportionate to the enemys capacity (Hamas) or intentions (Iran), is used for political gains. With many Israelis feeling they could find a better quality of life elsewhere and elections due, the end of 2012 required solidarity felt by Israelis at times of heightened security threats, such as the Nov 2012 operation, is a political tool.
The tragic thing is that Israel wants take the heads of Hamas who are currently not in Gaza but in Qatar. Both Qatar and Israel has good relations why don't they reach an agreement regarding Hamas and stop killing the innocent in Gaza.
Utterly ridiculous. Israel has enough firepower to destroy the entire Arab world. And that's not even counting their nuclear capability..
What does there being "3 times more arabs in Egypt alone then there are Jews in the world" have to do with anything at all? .
If "Palestinian" is a contrived label, then by your same idiotic logic, so is "Israel".
More excuses to justify why Israel uses an army to handle crimes rather than operate with swat teams and root out who they want.
They do. It's the essential justification to carry out apartheid and the various bombings against Palestine.
And interesting article I found on the topic:
Link to PDF article
TBH this thread dismays me. If Mexico were shooting rockets into America daily, and were sending rockets to LA Airport, I'm sure the tone would be different.
I come to GAF for the gaming forum, pop my head into off-topic, and find hardcore anti-Israel views.
I'm not a huge fan of Israel but they do have a right to defend themselves. Do you want them to just sit there in their bomb shelters and take rockets from Hamas?
And to the people saying that there are no Israeli casualties, that's only because they have bomb shelters and an anti-missile defense system. Hamas are now firing at Ben Gurion Airport and telling the world not to fly in to Israel due to their attacks on the airport.
WTF are Israel meant to do?
Wasn't aware of it, no.
And now that I have checked it, it seems it was more of a move of detterence than actual practice.
When Israel did blow up entire sections of Gaza or Lebanon, they warned the cititizens beforehand, so they didn't exactly kill innocents on purpose.
I don't like that idea if it comes true, but so far I haven't seen it happening in many occurances.
I find it non ethical, unless it exists only to frighten the enemy, rather than to actually carry out.
Regarding the claims that every airstrike in Gaza is preceded with a sort of warning to the target area:
On Wednesday, one of our Observers in Tel Aviv described what it's like for residents living under the constant threat of rocket attacks. But for Palestinians living inside Gaza, our Observer says there are neither warning sirens nor shelters in which to hide.
There is no respite… the jets bomb us all day long and then the raids intensify as soon as night falls. Even right now as I am speaking to you, there are missiles falling not far from my house.
Here, there are no warning sirens. Only the noise of the F-16s warn us that the bombs are close… but we don’t have any bomb shelters anyway. Faced with the choice of being outside in the street or inside your house, you might as well stay at home.
I live in a 7th-floor apartment with my family in northern Gaza. I know that they say that it’s best to go to a lower level during an air raid, but the Israeli rockets are too strong for any precautions like that to actually make a difference. If a building is hit, it’s usually levelled.
We spend days shut up in our homes. We only go out when it is really necessary, like when we have to go look for food. Yesterday, I risked going to a zone where the electricity wasn’t cut off. The streets were empty and most of the shops were closed. The city showed no signs of life.
Because of all the air strikes happening at night, it’s impossible to sleep. We watch the bombs light up the Gaza sky and hope we're not the next target. It’s only at dawn that we manage to get a bit of sleep.
Israeli military authorities say that their strikes are targeted and that they are only bombing militants who belong to Hamas. Even if you believe that’s what the army is really trying to do, the population density [Editor's note: Gaza has the highest in the world with more than 4,000 residents/km²] means that it is impossible to avoid civilian casualties during these operations, especially when they take place close to refugee camps that are already overpopulated. Moreover, the leaders of Hamas and the al-Qassam brigades are not at home during the air raids. In the best case scenario, their houses are empty. In the worst case scenario, their wives and children are at home. In each case, it’s civilians, not militants, who are killed.
The Israeli army also says that it warns residents before launching a missile at a target. Ok, sometimes they do send out a warning missile before bombing a house or an apartment building but they don’t do it systematically and they give residents less than 15 seconds to hide themselves. Where can you go in such a small amount of time? When they do manage to get out, people stay outside, keeping to the sides of the streets. They wait for the end of the bombardment to go back home, to help their friends and family or, at the very least, to try and save a few possessions.
http://observers.france24.com/conten...helters-israel
If facts are propaganda then... Ok. Would you like to comment on anything in that video which could be untrue/ faked? Or is anything coming from Israel automatically a lie, or null and void?
Well, it's interesting then that people like yourself claim they're ethnically cleansing Palestinians, when they're outpacing Jews in growth both inside and outside of Israel, but at the same time you acknowledge they could easily wipe out Gaza and the West Bank if they wanted to.
It has to do with their vulnerability in the region, and worldwide. That should've been obvious. It would be fair to say that Tibetans are more vulnerable than Han Chinese based merely on their population figures. Likewise Jains are much more vulnerable than Hindus.
There's no reason we can't be polite. I meant Palestinian as an ethnic group, not as a national identity, so in my comparison Palestinian = Jew, and not Palestinian = Israeli. Palestinians are ethnically Arab like the tens of millions of people surrounding Israel, which has a population of around 8 million, at least 1 million of which are arabs.
I don't know. I feel like this played right into Israeli hands with this whole situation. Using the pretext of three murdered Jewish Settlers (God rest there souls) and the retaliation of a beating of a Palestinian kid. And then the of course expected rocket barrage and leads to green pass on air strikes on targets they probably had long ago.
I sometimes wondering who is running the show over there in the Gaza. This isn't something that looks good for the Camera/news.The Israelis are using this to fulfill their objective goals, what about HAMAS. And with every rocket barrage it's equated to a military air strike, thus making it null and void in the international community.