Bold isn't true, there are times (you can easily find yourself) where terror organizations denied credit for things they have done. Usually they deny it when they know it will result in a complete loss of sympathy from others, other than their hardliners when it comes to retaliation.
I.E: Al Qaeda (Osama Bin Laden) denied credit for 9/11 until years after the invasion... Why? Because he knew taking credit at that period of time would definitely result in his and his organization's death. He was trying to use the legal system to delay any form of retaliation and knew that how difficult it would be to prove that he caused it in court.
Just because terrorist organizations tend to be out of touch with reality, don't mean they are completely stupid, they will using legal systems to their if possible benefit.
No... I see no reason for Hamas to take responsibility for the deaths of those teens considering it would mean what I said above.
From a military perspective, this isn't true. When he said there are 3 times more Arabs in Egypt he was referring to military applications. Wave tactics, while heavy in loss, is still something that can and will be used by inferior forces that have the number advantage. See Korean War.
So, one guy is how we are going to determine the success rate of the Dome? Do you know how he came to his conclusion? Because the Iron Dome is programmed to intercept mainly "threatening" projectiles I am pretty sure. There are multiple sources claiming different success rates from the 5% you mentioned to 70% to 90%.
But then, I would say each source seems to be using different definitions for successful "intercept".
Some use:
Disarms missile by knocking off it's trajectory
Some use, full on destruction of the warhead of the intercepted projectile
And then some use interceptions as disarming projectile
Considering General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding (and can pass whether U.S votes no or yes), I am going to assume you mean Security Council resolutions.
Can you source me when the UN have made resolutions against just Palestinians that were allowed to go through? Majority, if not all of the resolutions passed against Palestinians (including PLO and Hamas) typically condemned Israel as well. The resolutions U.S typically vetoed in the past were ones condemning Israel only as if they were the only one's in the wrong at the time the resolutions was made.
There are resolutions that U.S has allowed through and even voted for when it comes to condemning and ordering Israel to stop what they are doing, so your second sentence is false lol.
