Funniest part was Hud talking about teh flaming hobo in the subway
I think a sequel is probably inevitable. Wonder how they will go about it.
Hud carried the movie in pretty much every scene not involving the monster
s
Funniest part was Hud talking about teh flaming hobo in the subway
I think a sequel is probably inevitable. Wonder how they will go about it.
MIMIC said:Just wondering....are there any other "shaky cam" movies that are comparable to Cloverfield? I don't ever remember getting motion sickness in a movie so I just wanna know if this is worse than any other.
snack said:The movie isn't about the monster. It's about the people trying to survive the monster. THe monster would eventually be defeated by the military at some point, so whether that happened in the final bombing is a moot point, because it's destruction is inevitable. The real story is about the people and that wraps up nicely at the end.
Dead said:Did anyone get the feeling that there were two monsters?
I swear earlier in the movie when we see it, the Monsters head was more beakish, while at the end it was much more flat, or human.
Maybe it was a continuity mistake, but I clearly remember two different faces.
Dead said:Did anyone get the feeling that there were two monsters?
I swear earlier in the movie when we see it, the Monsters head was more beakish, while at the end it was much more flat, or human.
Maybe it was a continuity mistake, but I clearly remember two different faces.
75 minutes without credits. Probably 85 minutes with the end credits.Archer said:isnt it very short?
isn't that the typical horror movie cliche where they do something stupid no one in real life would do? Seriously, thats fucking stupid.jordan0386 said:They made one decision, go back for their friend. That is the whole movie right there!
topsyturvy said:isn't that the typical horror movie cliche where they do something stupid no one in real life would do? Seriously, thats fucking stupid.
Yeah. You see it's head full on and I swear it has some kind of huge beak that opens 3-4 ways, yet at the end it's a flat face.Bebpo said:When it ran at them before they got trapped in the subway it looked like a T-rex
I agree the design seemed like it kept changing each time you saw it. Was sorta weird.
topsyturvy said:isn't that the typical horror movie cliche where they do something stupid no one in real life would do? Seriously, thats fucking stupid.
topsyturvy said:isn't that the typical horror movie cliche where they do something stupid no one in real life would do? Seriously, thats fucking stupid.
"hey, i got a smart idea, lets go save my friend in the middle of the city where the giant titan is demolishing buildings."
People do not fucking do this for a girl, especially because of a myspace reply. (i could be wrong, The theatre's grunting noise overshadowed my hearing.)
You know, it's really easy to criticize people's actions when you're sitting in a theater and saying "MAN FOO I'D BE SMARTER THAN THAT WHAT THEY THINKIN"topsyturvy said:isn't that the typical horror movie cliche where they do something stupid no one in real life would do? Seriously, thats fucking stupid.
"hey, i got a smart idea, lets go save my friend in the middle of the city where the giant titan is demolishing buildings."
People do not fucking do this for a girl, especially because of a myspace reply. (i could be wrong, The theatre's grunting noise overshadowed my hearing.)
so they go back into the carnage to save someone, risking their own lives in the process?Belfast said:And what kind of movie would it be if they didn't?
"Hey, let's sit in one room for an hour and a half until we die!"
topsyturvy said:so they go back into the carnage to save someone, risking their own lives in the process?
:lol That picture is funny and disturbing at the same time.ParticleReality said:OH SHIT I UNDERSTAND IT ALL NOW. LOST TAKES PLACE INSIDE THE MONSTER, ITS ALL SO CLEAR.
BUILDING HUMP!!!!!
what about Matt?KBox said:Wow. Probably one of the most intense movie experiences of my entire life. The movie owned.
JJ Abrams... well done.
topsyturvy said:so they go back into the carnage to save someone, risking their own lives in the process?
Shapingo said:Can someone tell me after the helicopter crashHow does a 40+ story monster just sneak up on them. Really.......they didn't see it until it was right over them.....like it was hiding behind a tree. The ground shook every time it took a step, but not at the park, as it was just there as Hud runs back to get the camera. And weren't Beth and Rob only like 20 feet away?
sorry to rant
Phoenix said:I'm sure one of the major complaints of a typical audience will be that the movie at no point tried to explain -ANYTHING. I like movies like this because it makes the audience a more invested participant in the experience - you don't know jack more than the characters in the film so you never know what to expect. In fact at the end of the movie you can only make a shitload of assumptions about what happened 'next' or why it happened. Hell given the events of the film I can only assume that they had to nuke the creature to kill it given the shit they were throwing at it yet having 'ass-all' results against it.
Costanza said::lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
FOX News just said Cloverfield reenacts 9/11
:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
Oh shit, I forgot. I loved that psyche out. Me and all my friends were going "oh she is fucking done. BYE BYE!". It was almost certain she was gonna get fucked...then convention got flipped.Bog said:Did the brother's girlfriend's chopper get smashed?
There was definitely some room for improvement, but as a first time kind of deal, they excelled at a lot of things they really didn't need to and I just gotta give'em props for it.JzeroT1437 said:This seems to be becoming a love it/hate it kind of movie, which is strange considering I thought it was just "okay".
I don't regret watching it, but I didn't love it either.
Littleberu said:Yeah but the monster wasn't the main character, you know?
Firestorm said:I want that camcorder with its amazing battery life.
Is the ending on YouTube or something? I want to see this. I told my friend he was seeing things but apparently he wasn't!falling into the water thing
Jax said:your camcorder can't do 70 minutes? what?
Absinthe said:It is a self-indulgent, shallow piece of filmmaking. I also think Abrams has been exposed as an even bigger tool. Showing the audience something novel or weird (like a polar bear on an island or giant alien destroying the city), giving them vague details, and then leaving the audience with more questions is his method. He does that shit intentionally and the audience often searches high and low for a meaning and answers that just aren't there.
My main problem with the movie is I didn't give a shit about any of the characters. A bunch of loud yuppies screaming at the top of their lungs really didn't compel me to give a shit. It doesn't help that the party scene was insufferable.
Absinthe said:It is a self-indulgent, shallow piece of filmmaking. I also think Abrams has been exposed as an even bigger tool. Showing the audience something novel or weird (like a polar bear on an island or giant alien destroying the city), giving them vague details, and then leaving the audience with more questions is his method. He does that shit intentionally and the audience often searches high and low for a meaning and answers that just aren't there.
My main problem with the movie is I didn't give a shit about any of the characters. A bunch of loud yuppies screaming at the top of their lungs really didn't compel me to give a shit. It doesn't help that the party scene was insufferable.