yeah, with days gone, there's lots to like, & lots to dislike. i over-all enjoyed the game, tho it never really made it easy to do so. my advice: hang in there til you've hit iron mike's camp. once you get there, this's the point in the game, imo, where it's firing on all cylinders. peak days gone...Got it at launch and played like eight hours max and it was just so... dull. The thing is, I don't think any part of the game was bad, it's just that nothing was good either. Probably the best definition I can think of a game which is average in every way possible.
Game was amazing. Did you even play it? I played it at launch on ps4 and it was fine. Playing it again on PS5 and its glorious.The game was a piece of shit at launch and yikes at that tweet what a .
Bend better off without that dude.
lol Future is so bright that ever since they forced out their directors, they have spent the last 3.5 years working on fuck all. To the point that they have only been able to reveal a logo. A fucking logo in nearly 4 years. What a talented studio!
Just... no. LolIt honestly seems like your standard AAA game, my conspiracy theory is that sony didn't pay journalists for this one. Horizon, GoW, Uncharted they should all be rated closer to how Days Gone did, not that they are bad, it just seems like they all get rated higher than they should. The woke bashing just seemed like a convenient excuse for journalists to rate this game lower, without having to explain why Days Gone was any different than the regular AAA stuff they rate so highly.
Protagonist's skin colour.I never heard nothing about this game being woke around release. What was their complaints?
I can't deny this. Although I really, really hope Druckmann didn't intend Manny to be a visual self-insert. LmaoI understand nuance, I also think it was artistic projection/expression as well in that scene. They knew what they were doing with the chosen looks and optics.
The story being what it is is a shame. I've seen worse, but it's very very flawed. But there's elements of good in the performances, and the visuals (next gen notwithstanding), animations, gameplay and level design are practically unmatched IMO.Not saying it was a bad game, it wasn't at all. The gameplay was great, the story set out what it was trying to do, dreadful with a depressing conclusion.
lol Future is so bright that ever since they forced out their directors, they have spent the last 3.5 years working on fuck all. To the point that they have only been able to reveal a logo. A fucking logo in nearly 4 years. What a talented studio!
Who complained about that?Protagonist's skin colour.
Maybe horizon and GOT. But GOW and uncharted are pretty great. Uncharted 4 not so much as I feel I was in control of the character 20% of the game. Still a great experience if your into a cinematic gameIt honestly seems like your standard AAA game, my conspiracy theory is that sony didn't pay journalists for this one. Horizon, GoW, Uncharted they should all be rated closer to how Days Gone did, not that they are bad, it just seems like they all get rated higher than they should. The woke bashing just seemed like a convenient excuse for journalists to rate this game lower, without having to explain why Days Gone was any different than the regular AAA stuff they rate so highly.
It's all in the thread man, stop being obtuse.Who complained about that?
The bigots were mainly whining about sexual orientation, but a few did go off the deep end when using their lemming language of "white CIS"Protagonist's skin colour.
I thought it was set in Oregon…i dont know about the games initial release but I got the game a few months ago for my PS5 ($15!) and its absolutely phenomenal.
however i know im benefiting from a bunch of patches and the added power of PS5. maybe the game needed more time to cook.
anyway I got the platinum and im sad we almost certainly wont get a sequel.
edit - i especially loved the setting, they made colorado look stunning
Funny to me how we have MANY games come out in a poor state and not 1 reviewer will mention the bugs UNTIL they have a game they can pick on for these woke points, and all of a sudden the bugs get mentioned non stop.As for the bugs and poor performance, the game should've definitely been released in better state. You can only do a good first impression once and not many people cared that the state of the game has greatly improved (on the PS4).
Face it, people like brown and or female characters now.You mean the only game with a white male character?
lol Future is so bright that ever since they forced out their directors, they have spent the last 3.5 years working on fuck all. To the point that they have only been able to reveal a logo. A fucking logo in nearly 4 years. What a talented studio!
Face it, people like brown and or female characters now.
The stats speak for themselves.
People like good games.Face it, people like brown and or female characters now.
The stats speak for themselves.
?It's all in the thread man, stop being obtuse.
Same. Id give it a 7.5 myself even though i loved my time with it and platinumed it. The story kinda crawls to the finish line though the post credits scene was an awesome ending that set up what couldve been a truly awesome sequel.
The thing is I also think Ratchet is a 7. HFW is a 7. I saw Halo 5 and Gears 5 had a 86 metacritic. I was like wtf. They overrate all these games so their 7 is not exactly the same as our 7. This game if it was reviewed on content alone wouldve around mid 80s like all those Ubisoft open world games. The horde battles, the combat, the world design and yes, even the story had some great moments.
I have no idea what Ratchet and HFW do better in 2022 than Days Gone did in 2019 aside from graphics of course. It's still a better designed game.
Agree / disagree ?
Who complained about that?
Hope you're ready for their next live service game they chose as the culture shifted in the studio and they pushed the single player adventure designers out.thank god this fellow left bend
i approve of your standards...The game is no Pentiment or Wash Simulator, but it was fun to play with its flaws.
correct. my badI thought it was set in Oregon…
Never had as much fun as taking down hordes in this game.I think all of those are a playe a part but the fact the hordes were just unfun to fight was my bigger issue. Overall, I think it's an interesting game but I got gatekept by a horde in an underground section and I just said 'eff it' and watched the rest of the game on youtube.
What the fuck? The entire open world, every inch of it, is completely unpredictable, randomized and hostile.And random encounter in the open world is almost non-existent.
It's good from the get go, meaning it controls splendidly, looks stunning, and introduces you to the world.Haven't played it but from my understanding it takes like 10-15 hours to get good?
That's a massive flaw
That was my issue, too. The game came to a natural end when Deacon was preparing to head south ... but then we went south, and the game basically repeated itself. Shame. I still very much enjoyed playing it.It was too long but about 10 hours, there is a part where the game reaches a natural conclusion and even a tease for a second game ... oh wait nevermind, Deacons wife is alive and there is a whole new large second map to explore!
THe very fact that you would say woke in quotes shows where your allegiances lie. And yes, any untrained man can easily go up against a trained female ufc fighter, let alone a combat expert like nathan drake.I did, can you not read? it seems you're projecting.
Protagonist's skin colour.
Nathan is not a combat expert. They even show this in the combat where its messy (the prison fight is a good example), he gets hit often and he is wonky in his movement - he brutes everything. Also, show me a video of a normie fighting a trained fighter, even if they're female.THe very fact that you would say woke in quotes shows where your allegiances lie. And yes, any untrained man can easily go up against a trained female ufc fighter, let alone a combat expert like nathan drake.