Don't even get me started on the other Torchwood characters. Whoever planned the character arc that took Ianto from having his girlfriend shot by his work colleagues to starting a gay relationship with one of them three episodes later (with no foreshadowing at all) should be ashamed.
One season split between 2 years? WTF, BBC?
The issue is that they didn't seem to have any idea of what to do with Ianto, so his personality and purpose was changing all throughout the first season. They finally seemed to get a handle on him by Series 2, but some of that damage was done. The ignoring of everything with his girlfriend just made that stuff worse.
Torchwood Series 1 is a bit of a mess, where it doesn't really seem like the left hand knew what the right was doing (although there were a couple of very good episodes). The writing is all over the place.
Could they actually do that, though? The death of Adric is still talked about in hallowed tones.
Also, the silly stuff they started doing in Torchwood has completely wrecked the continuity with Who. I've basically got no idea how they could even begin to claim that Torchwood and Who are still set in the same universe.
I don't think Moffat gives a fuck as long as it's a good story. If he killed them both then he's basically the only writer who's ever killed every single one of his companions (see: Silence in the Library for the third).
Children of Earth and Miracle Day are proof enough. Those were the types of disasters that would set off the Cloister Bell or something equally worse. But where's the Doctor? It doesn't make sense that these normal alien hunters can solve all this insane shit.
Funny how the writer that's all about "Everybody Lives" is so willing to kill companions.
Funny how the writer that's all about "Everybody Lives" is so willing to kill companions.
BatDan said:Funny how the writer that's all about "Everybody Lives" is so willing to kill companions.
Do you think you have a thing for not killing characters, or bringing characters back?
Im not very good at killing people. I dont like it! I didnt even know that about myself until Russell pointed out that Id written six episodes of Doctor Who for him and I hadnt killed anybody. Literally hadnt killed anybody. No one dies in The Empty Child, no one dies in Girl in the Fireplace except the person who was dead already. I have killed a few but I havent killed any main characters, I dont think the doctors companions should die, I think that spoils the fairytale a bit. But that doesnt mean that I wont of course!
One season split between 2 years? WTF, BBC?
Children of Earth and Miracle Day are proof enough. Those were the types of disasters that would set off the Cloister Bell or something equally worse. But where's the Doctor? It doesn't make sense that these normal alien hunters can solve all this insane shit.
That shouldn't be a hindrance. In "The Big Bang", the universe was rebooted in a way such that the Doctor never existed. So it turns out the Earth got past all their pre-2010 crises without him.Since the problems of Children of Earth and Miracle Day were solved without the Doctor, why would he ever need to interfere in them? The Doctor wasn't needed and thus there was no reason for him to be there.
Well, many of those crises would no longer exist in that timeline either.That shouldn't be a hindrance. In "The Big Bang", the universe was rebooted in a way such that the Doctor never existed. So it turns out the Earth got past all their pre-2010 crises without him.
No, I don't think Canton knew, either. My point is that it's a narrative cheat to have a character say "no, it's not a duplicate, that's really him", and then have the big payoff 12 episodes later be "oh, it actually was a duplicate". I would be more accepting of the revelation if that line didn't exist at all.
I think the larger issue is that the whole "omg, the Doctor is really dead" plotline could never be resolved in any satisfying way that wasn't some sort of cheat. It would have to either be "The Doctor is magically revived", "Time can be rewritten", or "Oh, that wasn't actually him", and none of those are really satisfying conclusions to a 13 episode story arc.
Well, many of those crises would no longer exist in that timeline either.
I would have sex with her.
No joke.
I would have sex with her.
No joke.
hmmm not bad
![]()
Not really related, but...
I love this trough ton interview:
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/54329
On Colin Baker: "Miss Piggy! He's a little bit overweight."
Could they actually do that, though? The death of Adric is still talked about in hallowed tones.
That shouldn't be a hindrance. In "The Big Bang", the universe was rebooted in a way such that the Doctor never existed. So it turns out the Earth got past all their pre-2010 crises without him.
In the RTD/Moffat Whoniverse, the Doctor is no longer important for the survival of Humanity (or, in fact, the universe). I find this an endlessly fascinating data nugget to mull over.
I guess I'm having trouble understanding why as the show gets even more successful and makes even more money, they seem to be having trouble outputting content on the same schedule as when budgets were probably much smaller. Remember that 2009 didn't even have a season at all -- just 4 specials, most of which aired at the end of the year.
Well, many of those crises would no longer exist in that timeline either.
But whatever, it's a perfectly acceptable plot hole given that, well, it's Doctor Who.
Is that what actually happened? That doesn't seem to make sense. If the universe was rebooted but the doctor never existed then why does everyone still know who he is come 'A Good Man Goes to War' and why do the Silence fear him so much?
It was un-rebooted by the power of believing.
edit: Just to clarify, that's not actually a snarky joke. That was the resolution for the 2010 series. I'm not even sure what technically is considered to have actually happened in that season and what was unwritten. Surely, Amy now has a family, and the Tardis didn't explode anymore, right?
I think that's part of my problem with the series. Some stuff from previous series was unwritten by the cracks in space, and then the cracks ceased to exist (or probably never existed at all), and other stuff from that series was unwritten. But I no longer know what happened and what didn't. It's almost like they strived to make non-continuity canon in the Doctor Who universe.
I mean, did any of the alien invasions of the past seven tv years happen now?
I can't see how the Doctor not being born would stop the Daleks or the Cybermen from coming into being.
With the Daleks at least, the Doctor plays a key role in their history, most significantly in Genesis of the Daleks when the Time Lords send him to stop their creation.
DEM BUDGET CUTSOne season split between 2 years? WTF, BBC?
Well, some of them. For all of the crowing about the Doctor attracting danger, Batman-style, there's still been a hell of a lot of instances where aliens invade Earth and the Doctor accidentally happens upon it.
I think I misunderstood--I was thinking about the version of things where there was only Earth in the universe, so there would be no threats from non-Earth-based life.GameplayWhore said:Some of them are guaranteed to.
I was thinking about that. But they initially came to existence without his influence. What he did as a result of his interference was to delay their rise by some number of centuries.
Well, some of them. For all of the crowing about the Doctor attracting danger, Batman-style, there's still been a hell of a lot of instances where aliens invade Earth and the Doctor accidentally happens upon it.
The version after that, though, I thought what happened to the Doctor was much like everything else that had ended up sucked into that crack--they had still existed and the effects they caused were still in play, but no direct evidence remained of them. Just as Amy Pond could exist without Amy Pond's Parents, the effects of Doctor Saving the Day could happen without the Doctor seeming to be around. Admittedly, it's nearing two years since I watched the episode.
evilwart said:Another way to look at it is that the TARDIS purposely takes him to where he's needed, rather than the Doctor accidentally happening upon situations.
They made this explicit in The Doctor's Wife.
Has this been mentioned?
8 hours left on this Othertees design. It's nice.
![]()
http://www.othertees.com/
They made this explicit in The Doctor's Wife.
The cracks never made any sense. They erased Amy parents, but Amy still exists? When those soldiers were erased, how come other soldiers weren't assigned to that unit? It seems they only erased peoples memories of a thing, rather than the thing's entire existence.
It's because of who's running the show. RTD Julie and Phil worked their asses off, can't say the same for the current team, they just don't have the same passion.