D
Deleted member 231381
Unconfirmed Member
snip
Interesting. I wasn't proposing Cornell as a future show-runner, incidentally, just commenting that I always saw him as one of the highest quality writers for Who and was surprised he hadn't returned for the Moffat era. I don't really know who I'd go for out of Gatiss and Chibnall.
I liked Gatiss on Sherlock but his stable of Doctor Who episodes is... very poor. The Idiot Lantern was downright terrible, Night Terrors was generic and largely forgettable, Victory of the Daleks was so awful that future episodes had to dedicate a cutaway line to explaining away part of it, Cold War was a bad Alien rip-off (and don't get me wrong, I like Alien rip-offs, a third of all episodes of Who are Alien rip-offs, but this one was not good), The Crimson Horror was actively embarrassing to watch, and Robot of Sherwood has become a byword in the Doctor Who community for a really bad episode. In his defense, there's... the Unquiet Dead, which was passable, and Sleep No More, which was not good per se, but had potential that could maybe be exploited.
Chibnall's episode line-up is not exactly enthralling, but I think it has slightly more promise than Gatiss'. 42 was... okay, I guess. The Hungry Earth two-parter and the Power of Three were both potentially good episodes ruined by bad finales, but they started interesting at least. Dinosaurs on a Spaceship was alright.
Honestly, I really want it to be Toby Whithouse. He's the best regular writer outside of Moffat and Davies. Is there any chance it might be him?