I don't think this is ballsy at all. The PS4 has the momentum behind it. Ballsy would be picking the Wii U.
"For those asking, Edge went to print after Microsoft's DRM reversal and the story reflects it."If this is written before MS's u-turn then it'll only serve as an embarrassing highlight as to why print magazines are dying.
What? I don't have to. That cover is an advertisement for the PS4, and I hope Sony paid them well for it.
Nevertheless, it's a poorly written and barely funny piece they would not care about publishing a few years earlier. It was also just an illustration of how dire things have gotten, there's a lot more uninspired and poorly conceived content in every recent issue I've gotten my hands on (I wouldn't give any more of my money to Future, but I borrow an issue occasionally - thankfully, it's my god-given consumer right - to see if things have gotten better again, since I really miss the old Edge; alas, no, they haven't).
Man, looking back at old covers just brings home back how unremarkable this is even for EDGE.
![]()
With much more exclusives looking better and running at both 1080p and 60 fps.
What did Sony show? Sub-1080p right out of the gate (The Order), lots of games struggling with even 30 fps (Drive Club, Killzone, Knack).
Considering 180 is 6 months behind in first party development and their tools are worse than Sonys I think the true performance might be different than what Teraflops suggest.
Fool me once........
Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
I looked around the biggest electronics store in my country yesterday. They only had a sign announcing that they were taking pre-orders for the PS4, nothing for the Xbone. At all.Went into gamestop today to buy some games and the manager there shared this exact same sentiment as EDGE
OT: Arthur Geis am cry
Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
oh yeah? explain.Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
Man, looking back at old covers just brings home back how unremarkable this is even for EDGE.
![]()
Seems unlikely, it wouldn't take more than two weeks to print, the editorial deadline was probably just after the announcement, maybe a few days.
My guess is that they will say that the intent to devalue physical games means we can no longer trust MS as being on the side of gamers, they may also have sources who have independently confirmed the 60 min family plan fiasco. I think another point they will raise is that no one at MS has denied or clarified the position going forwards with regard to bringing back the DRM, clearly since it is being patched out it can be patched back in, so that might come up.
Other than that they will probably shit on the exorbitant UK price, Kinect, the TV shit that won't work here anyway and the general lack of focus from the division.
Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
To be fair, Sony did have good E3 showing for PS3....
Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
QFT.
This.
I'm still unsure as to why stating an opinion is now considered unprofessional. Because until we read the article, that's all we have to go on right now. I'm saving judgement until I have something to read besides a headline, seems silly to jump to conclusions about the piece before then.Very unprofessional. This could have been a column somewhere inside the magazine, but like this it's only going to enrage a lot of people.
EVEN if they were right, this is too much.
inb4 599$
inb4 599$
As usual here on NeoGaf, people adopts a meme and continues to repeat it obsessively. Now it is time for "mandatory kinect". Which, at some point, sounds like "mandatory gamepad" or "mandatory wiimote".
If Microsoft decided to add a Kinect in every Xbox One box it is because it is making this peripheral a distinctive feature of the console. Xbox One comes with a Kinect. That's it.
Requesting them to remove the new Kinect sensor to lower the price of the console is just plain stupid and does not take into account their will to differentiate the console through the addition of the Kinect itself. Maybe they are aware of the discussions about "two almost identical consoles" which were quite frequent in the last years?
Xbox One is not a more powerful Xbox 360. It is a more powerful Xbox 360 with a Kinect (your "mandatory Kinect"), and that's it.
If the peripheral is included in every console and the console sells well, then developers may always rely on it because every console owner has one. They can integrate it in every game and so on. More on, they could actually create Kinect-based games without being worried about the fact that the Kinect owners are just a fraction of the user base for Xbox One.
That's not a wrong choice. It is a bet, and an important one.
Maybe this will crush Xbox One sales. Maybe the "mandatory Kinect" will be an important selling point of the console. Right now I don't know. What I know is that I'd rather have PlayStation 4 and Xbox One with two different base philosophies instead of two similar console with just a bunch of exclusives to differentiate them.
Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
For those asking, Edge went to print after Microsoft's DRM reversal and the story reflects it.
The fact that this was written AFTER the DRM turnaround by Microsoft makes me want to read it even more.
Very unprofessional. This could have been a column somewhere inside the magazine, but like this it's only going to enrage a lot of people.
EVEN if they were right, this is too much.
To be fair, Sony did have good E3 showing for PS3....
Gemüsepizza;67661196 said:Why? I think it is not unlikely that the PS4 can be the next PS2. It's cheaper than the competition. It has much better hardware than the competition. It has very strong first party titles and every possible third party support including indie titles. It has improvements in all important areas (controller, online, development ease, ...). The PS4 will be a big success for Sony and certainly much more successful than the PS3.
I don't....the games that make the most money are still tailored for a young audience. Until you can goto work and tell co-workers about the titles you were playing last night, and it's not completely foreign to them, journalism will likely remain the same IMO...articles like this gets hits and flow with the general consensus on the web.Yeah, we all have biases. I wouldn't ask them to discard theirs because that's impossible. I might ask them not to be so blatant though. I think the possible perception the cover provides is that EDGE is taking sides and that's one of the main things a good journalist doesn't do.
I suppose that like of thinking is only worth something to you if you believe the gaming industry is capable of good journalism. (I do.)
Sony has really only showed there launch titles. Yoshida has came outright and said 20 titles in it's first year. It wasn't b/s when MS said it and it's certainly not for Sony. There efforts on PS3 is another testament to WWS, TLOU/GT6/Beyond releasing this late in the cycle gives people enough confidence and Sony doesn't have to show everything right away.Dunno, nothing Sony has done so far game-wise looks that appealing. Can see how people would be put off by some of the decisions Microsoft made (and Nintendo at this point is a non-factor)... but none of that makes the PS4 look good.
If you want power you'll join us in PC land. If you're after the games then I don't see any metric by which you'd consistently opt for PS4 over XB1.
That's kinda a contradiction isn't it? I was right there went you until you stated PC all the way. Same thing different boat, we're all biased in some way and prefer a console or platform, might as well own up to it.Time to get out of the console business for me. The fanboyism is just out of control. Edge should be very happy with a balanced future.... a one console future is the end.
PC all the way.
Presume it's all vastly outdated now, what with Microsoft's reversal on DRM and so on.
No it's not. It's an conversation-provoking headline that's done its job. You can't comment on its worth as an article, or even think it's been paid for (and believe me, it hasn't been paid for) until you've read the article.
How is this any different than The Economist putting a picture of Barack Obama on its cover in November 2008 with the caption "It's Time"?
Gemüsepizza;67662036 said:You haven't even read the goddamn article. But I guess you don't care about facts...
Yeah, I wonder of they'll run a retraction...
Man, looking back at old covers just brings home back how unremarkable this is even for EDGE.
![]()
Gaming journalism in a nutshell.
It's fucking disgusting.
It wouldn't surprise me if they're in the camp that feels that they can no longer trust MS because they showed their end goal, and it's something that will turn a lot of gamers off.
Yeah, I wonder of they'll run a retraction...