I should probably work on that weight one more time, it really didn't feel easy, I didn't have more in the tank. I barely made it
LOL, that was my first thought too. I had to think about what I was responding to.I wanna know too.
teehee
(sorry, bad joke)
Yeah, they can be. I was biting my cheeks like crazy, which is why I needed mine out.I don't need them out, but they are a bitch to clean.
335x4 bench. By far a PR
Yeah, once a week. I read doing it more often than that would tax your CNS too much or something.
I work out at home and just recently got resistance bands. What are your guy's opinions on those?
A little bigger. Less cut. About equal chest hair at the moment.God Damn! Is this you?
So why not add a shitload of spices to them? They're basically calorie free and some spices are particularly good for your body.
I don't really understand people eating plain chicken & turkey when it's so easy to jazz it up. If you can't cook, learn! Hell, you can get ready made spice mixes in packets these days anyway... it's not like you need to do a great deal of thinking about it. Just chuck it on and cook.
Better still, marinade up a huge batch, cook it and then freeze it. Then every day for a week you just get out what you need and reheat. Delicious.
335x4 bench. By far a PR
Ate like a king today cause I'm getting my wisdom teeth taken out tomorrow and won't be eating much all weekend.
I managed to do my 5x3 242 lbs squat sets today, but my knee wasn't feeling that well.... plus, the last rep on the last set reaally was a grind, I think I howled or something lol.
I should probably work on that weight one more time, it really didn't feel easy, I didn't have more in the tank. I barely made it
You might want to look into microplates. Adding 0,5kg-1kg is much easier than adding a rep or two and it adds up overtime. They are really useful for when you can't really progress with the normal 2,5kg increments (I'm looking at you OHP).
You might want to look into microplates. Adding 0,5kg-1kg is much easier than adding a rep or two and it adds up overtime. They are really useful for when you can't really progress with the normal 2,5kg increments (I'm looking at you OHP).
I know that feeling on OHP. God damn lift.
Saw this routine posted on reddit
Any thoughts?
The problem with that image is that it doesn't take into account that Jason Blaha's 5x5 is supposed to be a linear progression, as in, you are supposed to add weight to all movements every session.
As it stands, it's just a list of exercises (very poorly represented...those are barely like half squats at best).
If you just walk into the gym and do the exercises with whatever weights you feel like...that's a recipe for failure. It will lead to fuckarounditis, boredom, lack of progress and will end up the same as every other routine posted on Bodybuilding.com or whatever.
Otherwise it's a pretty standard strength Linear Progression with Hyperthrophy stuff added on. I'd suggest running something simpler like Starting Strength focusing only on the "big four" (squat, deadlift, bench and OHP) and then slowly adding the other movements over time.
Again, the exercises have to be programmed. If you squat 135lb one session you should be squatting at least 140lb the next.
That's the difference between a "routine" (useless and leads nowhere) and an actual training program (goal oriented and tracks results building up progress).
He looked way better before. Everybody has their goals though.
Not at 200lbs deadlift (assuming young male here). Do two sets of 5 three days a week, and eat good food, sleep, and don't forget your squats, chin-ups and presses.
I stopped doing deadlifts every workout once I got to 335. Then it was every other. If you're squatting 3x/ weeks heavy and deep then yeah might want to watch your recovery.
You should be fine deadlifting 2X per week, which I would encourage.
Yeah, they can be. I was biting my cheeks like crazy, which is why I needed mine out.
Thanks guys, I appreciate it. It's gonna be a fun weekend.Good luck Spiritreaver. Mine were going to mess up my teeth so I had them taken out even though the bottom were never going to actually come out of my gums. I had soup that night and then had subway the next day.
Well I'm doing Greyskull LP. It has 2 days of squats as well. Wouldn't doing 2X deadlift be a bit much for the legs? And if not, how do I incorporate it into my workout?
Thanks guys, I appreciate it. It's gonna be a fun weekend.
Wut? He looks way better post cycle/cycles.
Also, this goes with what cooter said last page about people hating on being bigger, lol.
I personally wouldn't do AMRAP DLs twice a week lol.
Buy some low carb cook books. Not so much because they're low carb, but because they tend to have very high protein recipes in them... a lot of which tend to be chicken.Don't know which ones. I'm open to learning just don't know from where, tried some random crap I found but meh, also sometimes can't find all the ingridients or just too lazy.
Wut? He looks way better post cycle/cycles.
happy belated new years!
The problem with that image is that it doesn't take into account that Jason Blaha's 5x5 is supposed to be a linear progression, as in, you are supposed to add weight to all movements every session.
As it stands, it's just a list of exercises (very poorly represented...those are barely like half squats at best, the Military Press is done standing, not seated)
If you just walk into the gym and do the exercises with whatever weights you feel like...that's a recipe for failure. It will lead to fuckarounditis, boredom, lack of progress and will end up the same as every other routine posted on Bodybuilding.com or whatever.
Otherwise it's a pretty standard strength Linear Progression with Hyperthrophy stuff added on. I'd suggest running something simpler like Starting Strength focusing only on the "big four" (squat, deadlift, bench and OHP) and then slowly adding the other movements over time.
Again, the exercises have to be programmed. If you squat 135lb one session you should be squatting at least 140lb the next.
That's the difference between a "routine" (useless and leads nowhere) and an actual training program (goal oriented and tracks results building up progress).
In his case, I don't see him progressing without it. The bar didn't even budge at 200 lbs which sounds like more than just a bad day.
If not DL, make sure you're adding some supplemental work for your lower back while you continue to progress on the squat, oblivion.
matter of taste I guess, but I'd rather take ten years to look like a healthy athlete, than have that hideous 'roided gut and those shit proportions, like the typically roided huge dealts that don't fit in the body's context.
Yeah I know. It just wouldn't be Greyskull LP though. I don't think one would modify one of the full body routines in the OP or even 531 to DL twice a week.
I'm currently on GSLP as well and I added back extensions to the accessory lifts I do at the end of each session. So it ends up looking like this, except squat and DLs are the second lift and back extensions are done last. I do 3x10 with ~5-10s static hold on the last rep of each set.
I don't know of any "routine", which is not "goal oriented and tracks results building up progress", making it useless as a parameter for distinguishing between the effectiveness of training programmes.
matter of taste I guess, but I'd rather take ten years to look like a healthy athlete, than have that hideous 'roided gut and those shit proportions, like the typically roided huge dealts that don't fit in the body's context.
not saying roids can't give you amazing results when used properly, like a guy I posted several pages back but this kid looks bad, both before and after in my opinion and the reason is because he's not an athlete.
My 2-cents on the topic are: be an athlete for a whole life, then when you know everything about nutrition, exercising, strenght and have attained the body that comes with that, consider PEDs that extra that will improve your gains a 10%-20%, the results will be fucking spectacular. This kid has none of that.
Just tried to run up the stairs.
"haha", said his legs, as he collapsed in a heap on the first step.
I don't know of any "routine", which is not "goal oriented and tracks results building up progress", making it useless as a parameter for distinguishing between the effectiveness of training programmes.
This is a little semantic, but the semantics here are important. The vast majority* of people in the gym have a "routine". They go into the gym, pick up some weights or sit down at a machine, do the movement and move on to the next machine/movement/what have you. They'll go through the same basic list of exercises. Maybe they'll think about how much they did before and feel like they can do more, so they do. Maybe they are feeling lazy and don't. They are getting some exercise, which is better than most of the populace and shouldn't be looked down upon for that. But in the end, a routine is just a list of exercises.
If your goals are to continually elicit a response of adaptation in your body, then you need programming which deliberately chooses specific movements and sets specific goals to achieve that adaptation through progressive overload. This involves tracking and planning of intensity and volume for each and every session.
*I'm probably being generous, and most people in the gym don't even have a routine, they just do random crap.
You really don't know of any routine like that? Really?
The vast majority just throw out a bunch of exercises with no emphasis on consistent progression.
The people who are doing random things and not following a progression are not following a routine. Show me one program which literally means you follow a list of exercises but do not mean to progress via the addition of weight, volume, reduction of time in between sets etc.
Literally every routine the trainers at the gym ever assigned to me until i discovered starting strength had fuckall linear progression. Was usually just divided in arms and back/chest and core/legs days, 5 to 7 isolation exercises per day, 3x12-15. You'd increase the weights maybe once a month, change the program a bit every two months.
Most people down here get their routines from the instructors on the floor, and its mostly shit routines like that. Par for the course down here :/
What you have just described is a routine, and there is easily the ability to progress on that said routine: once you can do 3 x 12-15 reps easily at a certain weight, add weight next time.
The fault is with the user of the program not knowing how to progress rather than it being the fault of the program itself.
The people who are doing random things and not following a progression are not following a routine. Show me one program which literally means you follow a list of exercises but do not mean to progress via the addition of weight, volume, reduction of time in between sets etc.
I'm taking you mean a routine which lists a bunch of exercises and has a rep scheme. I don't think it takes much intuition to realise that in this case the progression would be to add weight once you can do the prescribed rep scheme easily at a certain weight.
2) Personally I think the directive of "add weight when you can do the prescribed rep scheme easily at a certain weight" is squarely in fuckarounditis territory. Some people will do ok following that philosophy but it lacks such definition and clarity that it would impede progress IMO. It's the philosophy I went with for years and it got me pretty much nowhere. I wasted years of potential because I didn't have defined and purposeful programming.
If it's a set list of exercises, yes they are. That's the very essence of the word "routine". It's a fixed set of actions. Do A, then B, then C, etc. Thats a routine.
Programming, in the context it is used here, determines how you change that routine, and how often.
1) some people don't actually care. They want to go in, get some exercise, thereby improving their general level of fitness from their normal couch potato level. And that's fine. They don't want progression. They might benefit from it, but it's not their goal, so whatever. A regular routine is great them.
2) Personally I think the directive of "add weight when you can do the prescribed rep scheme easily at a certain weight" is squarely in fuckarounditis territory. Some people will do ok following that philosophy but it lacks such definition and clarity that it would impede progress IMO. It's the philosophy I went with for years and it got me pretty much nowhere. I wasted years of potential because I didn't have defined and purposeful programming.
Pretty much what happened to me.
Wouldnt call "blindly following a routine without understanding it" a program, but then we wade into them semantic seas.