Let's face it, if it wasn't for the homosexual scenes no one would be complaining.
Sex is part of life and part of any adult relationship, all of which are part of GoT's universe, get over it.
Haters, I thought the Viserys/Doreah was one of the best sexposition scenes last year.
- Developed the character of Viserys and made him more than just a two-dimensional caricature of a bratty prince.
- A sex scene (or post-coital) is really the only time Viserys would even open up like that
- Doreah's tits.
- For non-readers, we learn that dragons did exist in this world, and aren't just fairy tales or legends.
- First references to things like the (minor ACOK spoiler)- Doreah's tits.Faceless Men
Let's face it, if it wasn't for the homosexual scenes no one would be complaining.
Sex is part of life and part of any adult relationship, all of which are part of GoT's universe, get over it.
I don't personally have a problem with all of the sex. If I'm watching the show alone or with my close friends it's whatever. But when I try to watch it with my family or with my roommate and his friends who are really Christian it turns them off of the show and makes it really awkward. My family doesn't really give a shit, I'm sure, but my roommate and his friends who are huge fantasy fans that I know would otherwise love the show don't really like it because of all the sex. I just feel like it limits the audience unnecessarily.
Someone just mentioned that we're still talking about the sex stuff when there was hardly anything in the last episode, so please don't go projecting on us.
Let's face it, if it wasn't for the homosexual scenes no one would be complaining.
Sex is part of life and part of any adult relationship, all of which are part of GoT's universe, get over it.
At this point the show is becoming known for the sex by the masses. You've got to ask yourself if its because everyones a prude or if the series really is overusing sex as a backdrop to exposition.
How did that scene develop him? Furthermore the existence of dragons was discussed throughout the season.
How did that scene develop him? Furthermore the existence of dragons was discussed throughout the season.
I was rewatching the episode and i caught something from The Mystery Knight.
When Bran is talking to Luwin"My dreams are different. My dreams are true". Daemon Targaryen II says the exact same line to Dunk when he tells him he dreamed of him in Kingsguard white
Good call back on the show.
I was rewatching the episode and i caught something from The Mystery Knight.
When Bran is talking to Luwin"My dreams are different. My dreams are true". Daemon Targaryen II says the exact same line to Dunk when he tells him he dreamed of him in Kingsguard white
Good call back on the show.
Sometimes it helps to have multiple references to solidify the point in the audience's mind. We've already had one non-reader say that this particular scene helped him in understanding this point and I'm sure there were many others. And when you consider that the huge climactic scene of season one is dragons returning to the world, I think the writers can be forgiven for wanting to make sure the audience understood the significance of that event and why it had to be a Targaryen who did it.
Also, another minor piece of info that that scene relayed was the existence of the dragon skulls in the Red Keep, which Arya would stumble upon later in that episode.
I think Matt Zoller Seitz's editorial from last year is so on point. Here is the main thrust of his (and my) argument with regards to the sex and nudity on Thrones.
lol @ the complaints about sex scenes. As gutshot said, they must not be reading the Ice and Fire books.
Hell, isn't it the first Ned chapter or second Cat when they talk about Ned's seed and how moist it is on Cat's inner thighs?
That was nudity, not sex. If the scene had played out the exact same way but she kept her clothes on, would you still feel uncomfortable about it? If not, then yeah, you are prudish.I must have dreamed Margaery's tits in that case.
Yes nobody read the sex scenes in all of the books. Yep. It definitely wasn't ridiculous in the books either.
Iirc the most blatant quote is in AFFC.
That point could have been made in a sentence or two by another character. Maybe an insult from Stannis making fun of him for not satisfying his queen.
AFFC spoiler:Either a joke post or it is said in ADWD because I don't recall that from AFFC and I just finished that book last week.
lol @ the complaints about sex scenes. As gutshot said, they must not be reading the Ice and Fire books.
Hell, isn't it the first Ned chapter or second Cat when they talk about Ned's seed and how moist it is on Cat's inner thighs?
*Shakes head* Do we see fights happening randomly? All major battles and fight scenes have a very particular purpose. Not to mention the violence isn't really that bad. There are a few gruesome bits such as the eyestabbing and a throat slitting but it's not like we've gotten a straight up torture session yet. I also don't see long monologues or people discussing dragon names in detail while fighting.
*shakes head* Do we see sex happening randomly? All major nudity or sex scenes have a very particular purpose. Not to mention the sex isn't really that bad. There are a few naughty bits such as flaccid cock and some lesbian fingering but it's not like we've gotten straight up anal penetration yet. I also don't see blood spurting out of 10-year old kids' mouths or entrails flying through the air in gory detail while characters are having sex.
.....
See, two can play at that game.
Lots of things could be put out there in a sentence or two. That doesn't make it a better method.
AFFC spoiler:Jaime says to Loras something like "Put up you sword or I'll stick it some hole even Renly never found"
Sophie is beautiful
Yes, yes she is. It is actually making me somewhat uncomfortable =/
That was nudity, not sex. If the scene had played out the exact same way but she kept her clothes on, would you still feel uncomfortable about it? If not, then yeah, you are prudish.
That wasn't a sex scene... They sat in bath, together. If that is sex then I've pretty much had gay sex many times by sitting in sauna with other naked men.So many sex scenes where the sex does absolutely nothing for both the plot or characters. Viserys and Daenery's hand-maiden(I can't remember her name right now) obviously needed a sex scene while he had a monologue about dragons. Obviously.
lol @ the complaints about sex scenes. As gutshot said, they must not be reading the Ice and Fire books.
Hell, isn't it the first Ned chapter or second Cat when they talk about Ned's seed and how moist it is on Cat's inner thighs?
That wasn't a sex scene... They sat in bath, together. If that is sex then I've pretty much had gay sex many times by sitting in sauna with other naked men.
That wasn't a sex scene... They sat in bath, together. If that is sex then I've pretty much had gay sex many times by sitting in sauna with other naked men.
Yes, yes she is. It is actually making me somewhat uncomfortable =/
Lol that you think this is equivalent to a 5 minute pointless sex scene in the TV show. People are complaining because the sex is pointless and could be better time used for other characters and more important things not that it simply exists.
Can't wait to hear the complaints about how pointless it is when (ASOS)Jaime joins Brienne in a bath. It gets him hard so clearly he is aroused, and based on recent comments in this thread, that qualifies as sex and thus this scene will be seen as pointless...
What!? Where is that? What book and page number?
That's not pointless. It's a sex/nude scene between two major characters. Jaime and a prostitute would be pointless.
Really? So the sex scenes being lazy exposition dumps are now considered a particular purpose? Most of the battles and fight scenes are used to push along the narrative or for very particular character points. The Hound vs the Mountain was to demonstrate their hatred for each other. Also atleast the fighting is following the basic rule of showing and not telling. They've also shyed away for the most part from ultra-realistic violence scenes.
It was a sex scene because she was baring her breasts to arouse a man. And the same scene could have been filmed without partial frontal nudity without losing anything. In that case it's just there to titillate male viewers and that's what I object to.
My point is, and the main point of Zoller Seitz's article, is that many of the same criticisms of the sex can also be leveled at the violence in this show. It is excessive, unnecessary, uncomfortable to watch, etc. But it isn't, which indicates a Puritanical attitude in many viewers.
So Renly and Loras aren't major characters?
What about Theon and Asha/Yara?
So Margaery revealing her breasts to Renly was only there to titillate male viewers? Seriously? It's not just trying to accurately depict what a wife and husband would do in the bedroom? ...... Wow.
My point is, and the main point of Zoller Seitz's article, is that many of the same criticisms of the sex can also be leveled at the violence in this show. It is excessive, unnecessary, uncomfortable to watch, etc. But it isn't, which indicates a Puritanical attitude in many viewers.
No. You'll find out why Renly isn't in the next episode.
My point is, and the main point of Zoller Seitz's article, is that many of the same criticisms of the sex can also be leveled at the violence in this show. It is excessive, unnecessary, uncomfortable to watch, etc. But it isn't, which indicates a Puritanical attitude in many viewers.
So Margaery revealing her breasts to Renly was only there to titillate male viewers? Seriously? It's not just trying to accurately depict what a wife and husband would do in the bedroom? ...... Wow.