No. You'll find out why Renly isn't in the next episode.
This is a good one that obviously serves a point.
Just because he dies doesn't mean he's not a major character. He is one of the major players.
No. You'll find out why Renly isn't in the next episode.
This is a good one that obviously serves a point.
Jesus christ, no one is objecting to there being sex on the show; we're objecting to how it is used as trashy, lazily staged pandering to the idiot viewers (read: those defending it) who need their dose of tna to keep it engaging.
We aren't the ones making a number out of it. Nudity is nudity & sex is sex, they're pretty natural things in life. I've seen enough breasts in my life to not get all giddy when I see nude women in TV shows. The problem is with you if you are so bothered about it that you have to bitch about it every time there is a glimpse of boobies or sex in the show.Jesus christ, no one is objecting to there being sex on the show; we're objecting to how it is used as trashy, lazily staged pandering to the idiot viewers (read: those defending it) who need their dose of tna to keep it engaging.
ASOSNo. You'll find out why Renly isn't in the next episode.
I have read the books and know what happens. You are silly to think that because of what happens, that makes him a bit character.Hey, Ned Stark died before Season 1 ended, he must not be a major character guys!
ASOSSo Robb ain't a major character either, going by your way of viewing things. Neither was Ned. Or Robert.
My point is, and the main point of Zoller Seitz's article, is that many of the same criticisms of the sex can also be leveled at the violence in this show. It is excessive, unnecessary, uncomfortable to watch, etc. But it isn't, which indicates a Puritanical attitude in many viewers.
So Margaery revealing her breasts to Renly was only there to titillate male viewers? Seriously? It's not just trying to accurately depict what a wife and husband would do in the bedroom? ...... Wow.
Controversy from who? Surely not America.If the violent scenes lasted as long as the sex scenes there would be way more controversy.
We aren't the ones making a number out of it. Nudity is nudity & sex is sex, they're pretty natural things in life. I've seen enough breasts in my life to not get all giddy when I see nude women in TV shows. The problem is with you if you are so bothered about it that you have to bitch about it every time there is a glimpse of boobies or sex in the show.
I think the general complaint many have is not that there is sex, but that the sex is used as exposition dumps as Jarmel said. It just comes off very forced and poorly written.
I thought the Margery scene was fine, and especially liked that she seemed to be holding back a laugh after the "bang me doggystyle and pretend I'm Loras" suggestion. I would argue complaining about that scene (or the fisherwoman scene tbh) would be prudish, whereas complaining about the snowball is different.
Having watched Spartacus, I can't really say GoT's violence is over the top outside of a couple instances.
It's not that he dies. It's that clearly he has a very minor role.
Am I misremembering, or was Margaery a lot more of a ditzy carefree teenager in the book rather than the intelligent, scheming queen they are carving her out to be in the show?
Sixth: Those who wouldn't really mind the nudity or sex scenes at all if it was equal. Instead the direction is aimed towards the typical dudebro demographic. We might see two dudes making out every now and then, but they'll be fully clothed. Women, however, in pretty much every sex scene will always be fully naked, with the camera focusing solely on them.
I personally wouldn't mind the nudity or sex scenes if it wasn't filmed and directed in such a juvenile, generic male gaze-y way.
I don't know if anyone has linked it, but this made me laugh. http://randomestduckeva.tumblr.com/post/21189061116/snls-game-of-thrones
I don't agree with that at all, but to each their own.
Sixth: Those who wouldn't really mind the nudity or sex scenes at all if it was equal. Instead the direction is aimed towards the typical dudebro demographic. We might see two dudes making out every now and then, but they'll be fully clothed. Women, however, in pretty much every sex scene will always be fully naked, with the camera focusing solely on them.
I personally wouldn't mind the nudity or sex scenes if it wasn't filmed and directed in such a juvenile, generic male gaze-y way.
I don't know if anyone has linked it, but this made me laugh. http://randomestduckeva.tumblr.com/post/21189061116/snls-game-of-thrones
A) Part of it is probably due to Westeros being a male-dominated world and the women are being treated as objects (especially in the case of the prostitutes). It's not supposed to make us feel good or 'titillated' but sad about the state of affairs.
B) HBO, despite their reputation to the contrary, rarely shows explicit nudity. Lots of boobs and butts but hardly any genitals. What you seem to want is more penises to equal out the topless women, but I'm not sure if the two are equal. I think we've seen an equal amount of topless men to topless women and an equal amount of naked butts (and even genitals).
Yeah the scene where Daenarys took her top off and then the camera fast zoomed in and out while Viserys made honking noises was a little over the top.I personally wouldn't mind the nudity or sex scenes if it wasn't filmed and directed in such a juvenile, generic male gaze-y way.
Gonna be amazing.Wonder if we'll get a Brienne nude scene...
Going by the books we should!
Yeah the scene where Daenarys took her top off and then the camera fast zoomed in and out while Viserys made honking noises was a little over the top.
A: I get that it's a male dominated society and that a lot of these women are forced into it. That doesn't really excuse the directing which films it in the same exact way they'd film any other T&A shot. "Oh, that poor girl" *tits close up* "this must be so horrible" *ass shot* "just terrible."
B: I dunno, if they can find a way to make sure that the one gay male love scene is covered up..it just seems awfully convenient.
Sure, I'm not saying you have to agree. Butif he's a major character, then I think so is Yoren and hundreds of other characters. What sense would it make to show Yoren have sex and devote a 10 minute scene just to him when he won't be around for long? I don't understand why you would do that when it means you have to cut out/rush through the story parts of the actual main characters.
She's 16. What's uncomfortable about finding a 16 year old attractive? As long as you don't act on it there are no problems.Yes, yes she is. It is actually making me somewhat uncomfortable =/
Controversy from who? Surely not America.
From your limited knowledge of the States you must think horror movies make 500 million here.
No one wants to watch a six minute mutilation scene regardless of country.
I don't know which discussion is worse, complaining about the sex on GoT or complaining about Yara's casting.
How would GAF react to a Yara sex scene?
I have no idea what's going on in here. It makes me sad.
Unmarked spoilers are out of control now that the thread heated up, I'm gonna have to assume anything not marked is a [series] spoiler and miss some of the discussion I could read/join otherwise.
My books arrived and can't wait to start reading. Really nice box set for $20
It does when the other way results in rushing through and cutting out parts of Arya's story.
Grats! Now hurry up and get on that incredible rollercoaster!My books arrived and can't wait to start reading. Really nice box set for $20.
You don't have the books lined up in the right order YOU FOOL
Hah grats manDamn I spent the whole 20 seconds lining up the books for the photo op and I fudged it all up.
sad that people who have read the books can not leave us TV watchers to their own discussion without chitting on it
The sex scenes need to go, but its nice to see the man-on-man action occur sometimes. Another thing I hate, is they always wait until the last 5 minutes to get really good... then you have to wait another week to see how it plays out. UGH.
You never said anything about mutilation, just violence. The way I interpreted that was a 6 minute bloody battle scene and if you think there would be a controversy over a bloody fight, that is ridiculous.
Again, no mutilation was mentioned.
Prunes or prudes?