It's less about privatisation and more about facilitating the act of doing business in Greece. Less bureaucracy. The new government still does not tackle that issue.
For point 2, it seems more like a very general proposal that we've heard for years now. Nothing specific once again.
I came across this WEF report on "Competitiveness" that seems relevant on this point.
http://reports.weforum.org/global-competitiveness-report-2014-2015/economies/#economy=GRC
The various rankings in general are quite interesting, in measures of "Government Efficiency" there seems to certainly be room for improvement.
Code:
Index Rank /144 Score
Wastefulness of government spending 1-7 (best) 131 2.2
Burden of government regulation 1-7 (best) 136 2.4
Efficiency of legal framework in settling disputes 1-7 (best) 126 2.7
Efficiency of legal framework in challenging regulations 1-7 (best) 114 2.7
Transparency of government policymaking 1-7 (best) 120 3.4
There are some other quirks that standout. Regarding higher education, "Quantity of education" the country ranks 1st of 144, while "Quality" is 87th.
"Capacity for innovation" ranks 109, despite availability of scientists and engineers being very good (rank 4).
EDIT: Looking at the methodology of these metrics, I suppose one can question the validity to an extent - as some of them are based on a subjective "Executive Opinion Survey."
----
To explain the further consequences, that means this is probably a better deal than the referendum one (marginally) if Greece expects their economic position to deteriorate rather than improve, because the referendum deal would have involved returning to negotiations sooner with a worse economy.
Does this consider though the economic impact of the last week and a bit's events?
(I.e. the imposition of capital controls as a result of the lapsing of the second bailout and the plausible spectre of Grexit.)
Or to put it another way, could a similar outcome have been achieved without all this brinksmanship.