Hearthstone |OT6| C'THUN for President! Why pick the lesser evil?
- Thread starter ZealousD
- Start date
slightconfuse
Banned
Sick play by amnesiac to cold blodd the whelp
It probably lost him the game. All flash.
slightconfuse
Banned
Would twisting nether have been the right play?
Love Reno l9ck
Love Reno l9ck
Dead either way.
Ragnaros was the right play because that was the only way he could've won the game in the long run. When you are losing you just have to take those risks.
And this isn't even OG Renolock, this is like Renolock combined with Combolock as it has Abusive, PO, Faceless and Leeroy.
he had 19 health right and rogue had a dagger up right?
nothing would have saved him in this situation. Playing rag is probably right IMO, hitting the auctioneer leaves your opponent with a rag they need to deal with.
OG as in Old Gods, should have said WOG. That combo is old either way though, it used to be either Feugen/Stalagg or Leeroy/Faceless in Renolock
?
The showing Renolock had in EU made it the deck type that saw the greatest growth in representation moving into the NA tournament.
Mage and Rogue both have way too much damage out of hand right now. Seems like a huge oversight to me but I don't know how it would have been stopped with the cards available right now.
slightconfuse
Banned
No Interactivon > interaction
Rosenskjold
Member
Someone needs to help me out here! Game after game I'm beating shamans all game long, and they whip out JUST enough dmg for lethal on a turn where they have nothing but a totem on board and 2 cards in hand. And I was on win-streak that could have finally taken me to rank 9.
Rosenskjold
Member
Wow ha ha
edit: Playing tempo warrrior against pirate warrior.
He trades all the time instead of going face, we get to mid-game and he plays a finley and this happens:
Marvelous.
They are just so energizing and positive that the games are more entertaining. Combined, they will conquer the world.
Tweeked my Dragon Paladin deck and it is doing better at rank 7:
2 gadget jousters lead to awkward topdecks. 2 apothecaries were too weak in situations where I don't need heals, and against aggro they don't really do anything. Light in the darkness gives me something to do on turn 2 that doesn't hurt my jousting potential, while also smoothing out my curve.
slightconfuse
Banned
Triple SI dream
N'Zoth play is seemingly phasing out, meta moving toward bursty decks and that deck is very weak to burst as it is so slow and can't stack health like warrior can. It doesn't have a good card draw engine, it can get out valued by something like tempo warrior too. It was very popular last week, but today NA prelims is looking very different. Firebat showed last week that you can easily target N'Zoth paly in tournament format too with his combo decks. I think the deck won't be very popular going forward but it will be around.
Familienoberhauptvogel
Banned
Urgh I should not play on the weekend. A) playing bad and B) losing to awful decks
Why is malkorok such a great card? I put it in my c'thun warrior and it always delivers. A bunch of times I've gotten pretty average weapons like a war axe or storm forged axe and I'm sure I'll pull a cursed blade eventually, but the fact is that you get a vanilla minion for 5 mana and at least 2 mana worth of weapons and possibly more. Spawning a gladiators longbow is utterly devastating but basically any weapon is good. The card isn't completely unfair so it might not see a lot of competitive play, but I think it's still worth using
Rosenskjold
Member
Every single game before rank 9!! Druid sits with 2 swipes and a disciple of c'thun for exact lethal, only cards in hand. I swear this has happened 2-3 times in a row, going to bed still at those 2 stars before rank 9. The salt is real!!
It currently does see a lot of competitive play. It's one of the key cards in one of the best decks on the ladder, "tempo warrior".
Portugeezer
Member
5 cards, 3 soul fires.... discard the non-soul fire cards.
ESPORTS!
ESPORTS!
The Mango Sentinel
Member
Those 3 Soulfires...there is a 0% chance that would ever work for me.