If it is Greenberg that told you that, don't worry, it is not true.I heard Greenburg murdered a man behind an Arby's in 1988.
Only thing being murdered were stacks of Arby's sandwiches.I heard Greenburg murdered a man behind an Arby's in 1988.
Only thing being murdered were stacks of Arby's sandwiches.
Damn... I don't trust Grubb but I sure as shit don't trust Greenberg.
But you too are also Gaf.So basically, no matter what the evidence is, it's bad news for Microsoft.
Keep on grasping, Gaf.
Well, the reason would be to paint Xbox and Hi-Fi Rush in a good light, turning away the bad press.This is what I came here to say as well. If MS/Xbox didn't care about the game and was disappointed in the sales, they just wouldn't say anything because the future of the franchise and the nature of the release wouldn't matter. There is absolutely no reason for Greenberg to lie here.
What? The metrics are only relevant to MS, and crazy console warriors. MS were happy to let the game speak for itself.Refuted requires giving actual numbers, not meaningless vague statements like "trust me, the numbers are so great that we can't even share them".
Especially, coming from Greenberg who plays the role of Internet Xbox fanboy better than VP of anything and has been publicly contradicting himself for the last 10-15 years.
If you believe the public should know the success or lack of success of your software or hardware, share the numbers. But, refusing to do that while saying things are selling "well", is just hoping for your audience to be gullible.
This is what I came here to say as well. If MS/Xbox didn't care about the game and was disappointed in the sales, they just wouldn't say anything because the future of the franchise and the nature of the release wouldn't matter. There is absolutely no reason for Greenberg to lie here.
So, Tango Gameworks started working on their next big game weeks ago along with expanding their staff means nothing?....Lol.It's not just Greenberg.There are lots of reasons for him to lie. Xbox has been having a really bad round of PR for the past few weeks; reporting of HiFi failing to meet expectations would just compound on the slew of other bad news that has come about. And would be yet ANOTHER Zenimax game not "living up to expectations" (others being RedFall reception, and Ghostwire performance on Series X vs PS5 despite an extra year of development).
There's also the fact that HiFi comes from Tango, MS's sole internal Japanese studio, and there's the ever-running narrative of Microsoft just being terribad at courting Japanese developer support. If they want to retain at least respectable optics in that regard, they don't need reports of an otherwise refreshing nugget of a game from their internal Japanese team, failing to meet internal sales/revenue expectations, even if there's a chance said report(s) could be true.
I'm not saying any of this to state definitively that Aaron Greenberg is lying, BUT it doesn't dismiss the possibility he is. Not to mention, this guy has been very disingenuous and misleading in multiple instances in the past on Twitter, so I wouldn't say he's the most blindly trustworthy mouthpiece to listen to.
There are lots of reasons for him to lie. Xbox has been having a really bad round of PR for the past few weeks; reporting of HiFi failing to meet expectations would just compound on the slew of other bad news that has come about. And would be yet ANOTHER Zenimax game not "living up to expectations" (others being RedFall reception, and Ghostwire performance on Series X vs PS5 despite an extra year of development).
There's also the fact that HiFi comes from Tango, MS's sole internal Japanese studio, and there's the ever-running narrative of Microsoft just being terribad at courting Japanese developer support. If they want to retain at least respectable optics in that regard, they don't need reports of an otherwise refreshing nugget of a game from their internal Japanese team, failing to meet internal sales/revenue expectations, even if there's a chance said report(s) could be true.
Also not to mention, it's news that could reflect poorly on Microsoft in terms of management and/or internal expectations of acquired publishers...when they're currently trying to acquire yet another massive publisher in ABK. Would not really reflect well there.
I'm not saying any of this to state definitively that Aaron Greenberg is lying, BUT it doesn't dismiss the possibility he is. Not to mention, this guy has been very disingenuous and misleading in multiple instances in the past on Twitter, so I wouldn't say he's the most blindly trustworthy mouthpiece to listen to.
What?Their entire business model now revolves around game pass.Imagine asking about ticket sales from Netflix...."Break Out Hit." is probably a true statement. Greenberg's job is PR.
But what I'm certain of is that XBOX/Greenberg wont provide numbers. I mean, "Break Out Hit" in the context of Gamepass isn't exactly an insurmountable milestone.
Why?....Their entire business model now revolves around game pass
Can this even be more ridiculous?There are lots of reasons for him to lie.
This is what I came here to say as well. If MS/Xbox didn't care about the game and was disappointed in the sales, they just wouldn't say anything because the future of the franchise and the nature of the release wouldn't matter. There is absolutely no reason for Greenberg to lie here.
It does.Their first party games always stay in game pass and there is zero incentive to buy them.That's what they want.Subscriptions over sales.No, it doesn't
It does.Their first party games always stay in game pass and there is zero incentive to buy them.That's what they want.Subscriptions over sales.
A breakout hit that's been basically forgotten about within a month?
What?Their entire business model now revolves around game pass.Imagine asking about ticket sales from Netflix....
So, Tango Gameworks started working on their next big game weeks ago along with expanding their staff means nothing?....Lol.It's not just Greenberg.
First rule of PR. Debunk rumors only when you can do so with absolute certainty. Otherwise, simply don't comment.
Grubb's clout-chasing bullcrap isn't nearly relevant enough to lie for. It doesn't go anywhere beyond the console warriors on social media and specialized websites, and that's not even close to touching Microsoft's bottom line.
Explains the 3rd party publisher/IP scoop up spree. We have come full circle.I don't know why everyone is even discussing numbers. Everyone knows Xbox has no games.
I have never seen a single person say that about Grubb at Gaf. Ever.Grubb is, whether rightly or wrongly, one of the most prominent "insiders" in gaming and has a lot of clout in the space due to that.
When the A/B/K deal clears, Xbox definitely needs to expedite Bobbie's departure ASAP, but they need to replace Greenberg with Lulu. She's total troll, but she' a riot and 1000 times more likeable than Greenberg.
I have never seen a single person say that about Grubb at Gaf. Ever.
I buy all of their first party games on day one. Fuck Game Pass. Game Pass is only 10-15% of their revenue anyway. Remember, most people don't have Game Pass, and Phil already said that Game Pass is already at its saturation point at 10-15%.It does.Their first party games always stay in game pass and there is zero incentive to buy them.That's what they want.Subscriptions over sales.
If Hi-Fi Rush was a flop then expanding the studio is the last thing they would be doing.Also, They would be taking time off to change next game from being a flop instead of moving straight to next one.Try using your brain sometimes.It helps.You mean that JRPG which is just rumored and won't even be released for another 4-5 years if it turns out to be true?
Fair enough. I have him blocked, so sadly I have to see his shit hereI'm not talking about just GAF. Online, in many circles, he's considered a prominent insider.
Personally I don't pay attention to him that often, but that's just an anecdotal.
Even though Aaron words are PR, the guy is more reliable than Grubb.You mean that JRPG which is just rumored and won't even be released for another 4-5 years if it turns out to be true?
Grubb is, whether rightly or wrongly, one of the most prominent "insiders" in gaming and has a lot of clout in the space due to that. I do think part of that is him clout-chasing but it doesn't change the fact he has the clout.
That said, I don't think he does it for console warring; personally he seems more like a Nintendo/Microsoft guy, more of the former than the latter, but into the ecosystems of both more so than Sony from what I've noticed. So he wouldn't put out something potentially negative relating to Xbox just for lolz or console wars.
And again, even in this statement there's a lot of PR in Aaron's tweet. What are these "key measurements and expectations"? Are any of these financially-related? If not, then it doesn't actually invalidate Grubb's statement; the game could have met other expectations in say number of downloads or number of people who reached a certain point in the game, but still have sold low relative to expectations for sales and revenue.
It's just impossible to parse that in large part because Aaron is a marketing/PR guy and would not get specific like that in any statement. Gotta obfuscate as much as possible, he learns a good deal of it from Phil.