Does it save the progress you made since you died when it sends you back to a Fire or is all progress lost and it just reloads a save?Apparently it's recommended that you safe often at bonfires as the game throws you back to the last time you did so which can put your progress at risk (also: the game is supposedly challenging).
Don't know about those specifics.Does it save the progress you made since you died when it sends you back to a Fire or is all progress lost and it just reloads a save?
Not gonna lie, Eurogamers review bothered me, they seem to dismiss guerilla. The USgamer review never bothered me as that seemed to be an outlier way out there, but eurogamer throwing shade at GG, amongst all the rest of the glowing reviews seemed...petty to me. Seems like GG put a lot of care and heart into the game. Maybe I am just sensitive lol.
I don't think Eurogamer did this. They note that its refreshing and is a good shake-up from what Guerrilla did before and show level-headed respect for GG's earlier work. But they also state a lack of confidence in open world game design shows.
The Eurogamer review is still fairly positive. The guy says it's "very, very far from being a bad game" near the end.
What's the concensus on the side quests? Are they Witcher quality? Skyrim quality? Inquisition quality?
I don't think Eurogamer did this. They note that its refreshing and is a good shake-up from what Guerrilla did before and show level-headed respect for GG's earlier work. But they also state a lack of confidence in open world game design shows.
The Eurogamer review is still fairly positive. The guy says it's "very, very far from being a bad game" near the end.
What's the concensus on the side quests? Are they Witcher quality? Skyrim quality? Inquisition quality?
88 in the Metacritic is good now? Or is this game getting a free pass just because?
i dont know imo its just the robo-dinosaur thing which makes it stand and exceptional aka ton of people wanted openworld action game with dinos for years ... I am pretty sure if it wasnt for unusual theme (aka if it had zombies instad btu everything else the same for example) it wouldnt had the such high praiseThey said it has technical bravado,, but like all guerilla games is forgettable..which is quite the contrary looking at the reception
i dont know imo its just the robo-dinosaur thing which makes it stand and exceptional aka ton of people wanted openworld action game with dinos for years ... I am pretty sure if it wasnt for unusual theme (aka if it had zombies instad btu everything else the same for example) it wouldnt had the such high praise
What's the concensus on the side quests? Are they Witcher quality? Skyrim quality? Inquisition quality?
Fetchy.
They said it has technical bravado,, but like all guerilla games is forgettable....which is quite the contrary looking at the reception. To me seems like thats a pretty big slant against GG and the work they did here, but I digress, it is not a big deal at the end of the day, just something that caught my attention.
i dont know imo its just the robo-dinosaur thing which makes it stand and exceptional aka ton of people wanted openworld action game with dinos for years ... I am pretty sure if it wasnt for unusual theme (aka if it had zombies instad btu everything else the same for example) it wouldnt had the such high praise
So what your saying is, if TLOU 2 ditched the "zombies" and instead had robo dinos it would break metacritic. Come on, if we change these things people like it might not be so well liked.i dont know imo its just the robo-dinosaur thing which makes it stand and exceptional aka ton of people wanted openworld action game with dinos for years ... I am pretty sure if it wasnt for unusual theme (aka if it had zombies instad btu everything else the same for example) it wouldnt had the such high praise
Fetchy.
This really does not make sense.i dont know imo its just the robo-dinosaur thing which makes it stand and exceptional aka ton of people wanted openworld action game with dinos for years ... I am pretty sure if it wasnt for unusual theme (aka if it had zombies instad btu everything else the same for example) it wouldnt had the such high praise
I'm just going to re-link what has already been discussed here. A lot of context is missing, from what I'd like to think are usually polite reasonable posters in that thread. Hopefully you can at least see my point of view as amicably as follows.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230652882&postcount=1991
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230653380&postcount=2058
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230654004&postcount=2155
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=230654602&postcount=2253
88 in the Metacritic is good now? Or is this game getting a free pass just because?
That's just as dumb as saying it it weren't for a highly rated rhythm game's good music, it wouldn't be as well received.i dont know imo its just the robo-dinosaur thing which makes it stand and exceptional aka ton of people wanted openworld action game with dinos for years ... I am pretty sure if it wasnt for unusual theme (aka if it had zombies instad btu everything else the same for example) it wouldnt had the such high praise
I reckon if it was a different game it would've got a different score, I don't see why people are praising it?
I'm pretty sure that poster was just being facetious.did you just look at the scores or did you read the reviews? that'll tell you what it is about it that they are praising.
They said it has technical bravado,, but like all guerilla games is forgettable....which is quite the contrary looking at the reception. To me seems like thats a pretty big slant against GG and the work they did here, but I digress, it is not a big deal at the end of the day, just something that caught my attention.
Butchie
Interesting, I recall they praised Killzone 2. But yeah the tone did fob GG off a bit.
I reckon if it was a different game it would've got a different score, I don't see why people are praising it?
What does that even mean?, if it was a different game?, I would imagine a different game would also be rated on the product as a whole.
I think people need to realise that an overall rating is a result of the sum of it's parts, not it's parts in isolation.
Or are people hinting that as a Sony exclusive it's getting a free pass?
i dont know imo its just the robo-dinosaur thing which makes it stand and exceptional aka ton of people wanted openworld action game with dinos for years ... I am pretty sure if it wasnt for unusual theme (aka if it had zombies instad btu everything else the same for example) it wouldnt had the such high praise
I don't think Eurogamer did this. They note that its refreshing and is a good shake-up from what Guerrilla did before and show level-headed respect for GG's earlier work. But they also state a lack of confidence in open world game design shows.
The Eurogamer review is still fairly positive. The guy says it's "very, very far from being a bad game" near the end.
nott what i was trying to say but whatever .... i guess I didnt clarified it enough or used someThat's just as dumb as saying it it weren't for a highly rated rhythm game's good music, it wouldn't be as well received.
I reckon if it was a different game it would've got a different score, I don't see why people are praising it?
BTW since you guys were talking about angry joe earlier. He didn't get a review copy. Said so on twitter
nott what i was trying to say but whatever .... i guess Ididnt clarified it enough...
i just wanted to say that the main appeal of the game and main thing that generated all this hype was the theme itself not really the story or gameplay ... yeah story and gameplay is fine and all, but much i was just trying to say that way less people would care about it with more generic theme
I think he's making fun of the post below.
nott what i was trying to say but whatever .... i guess Ididnt clarified it enough...
i just wanted to say that the main appeal of the game and main thing that generated all this hype was the theme itself not really the story or gameplay ... yeah story and gameplay is fine and all, but much i was just trying to say that way less people would care about it with more generic theme
nott what i was trying to say but whatever .... i guess I didnt clarified it enough or used some
i just wanted to say that the main appeal of the game and main thing that generated all this hype was the theme itself not really the story or gameplay (at least is for me and my friends with ps4) ... yeah story and gameplay is fine and all, but much i was just trying to say that way less people would care about it with more generic theme
Joke post, right?
Goood old DooMAGE! Appears in another Sony thread to shit all over the damn floor! I know you don't like Sony but you can at least stop the one time drops in any threads relating to them or their games if you don't like it that much, as I know you hate them being mention in any thread related to Nintendo as you mentioned before. Want to have a look at that
Edit-Ah already see people got on him![]()
BTW since you guys were talking about angry joe earlier. He didn't get a review copy. Said so on twitter