Manmademan
Member
Who the fuck cares
you're in a review thread, genius.
God forbid someone should actually have something to say about a reviewer.
Who the fuck cares
I don't like rhythm games and I loved Thumper. I don't like visual novels but VA-11 HALL-A is greatI kind of agree with this although I don't care about reviews mostly at all. But since Zelda is mentioned, say I was a reviewer and my boss was like hey review this Zelda game should I play it forced for a few hours then just give it a 5,6 and say it's not my cup of tea ? Or say to my boss hey I'm not interested in this game maybe you should send it to another reviewer ? On the one hand it's your job on the other if you review art do you still review art you dislike? I definitely see in other industries they review everything like a dumb comedy may often get a 2/10 but do 100 million box office.
Which is the problem. Not every game is going to resonate with everyone. I don't like GTA at all as a series, but I'm not going to review the game and give it a 3/10 because "GTA is a chore to play" for me.
There's not a lot to go on since she doesn't seem to have a lot of reviews, but being persistently well below average for every game, usually with the same complaints is a problem. Hell, she gives the exact same complaints for Horizon as she does "I am setsuna" and scores them both as a 5/10 because she can't bring herself to care about the story.
As another poster pointed out- 4/10, 5/10 are extremely low scores- even within the same publications (Polygon, USgamer) so we don't have an "edge" situation where 5/10 is "average."
It's one thing to give a game that is universally praised a 7. It's a completely different thing to give a game that everybody is giving 8's & 9's a 5. That's a big gap and makes me question the reviewer cause. A 5/10 is usually the score given to a poor game.
its an opinion
Shinobi almost done with the goods?
http://kotaku.com/horizon-zero-dawn-the-kotaku-review-1792538336Unscripted moments where different entities would clash with one another in unexpected ways added to the sense of wilderness. Sometimes, I'd stumble upon humans fighting against errant dinosaurs, or watch as robots turned on each other. I observed robotic vultures pick apart the body of another robot. During another segment, I racked my brain trying to figure out how to sneak by some human enemies, only to have a titan unexpectedly swoop from the sky and wreck everyone's shit. Problem solved! Horizon is at its best when it upends my expectations like that.
70 + reviews, let me see which one confirms my bias "Eurogamer"....
I know Engadget isn't on MC, nor do they assign scores to games, but their reviewer isn't particularly fond of open world games, yet came away enamored by it. While I understand what you're getting at, there's nothing to suggest the reviewer doesn't play open world titles outside of what she's reviewed, so it's a flawed premise.
I don't like rhythm games and I loved Thumper. I don't like visual novels but VA-11 HALL-A is great
Not being experienced or not liking a genre doesn't you shouldn't review it, especially if it's an blurry line between genres/gateway thing. An open world game with a focus on straight-up action, strong story focus, and streamlined RPG elements is certainly in that category
Heard from a former dev that the game was a true collaboration of the entire company. When they where finishing kill zone they started gathering everybody in a big meeting room asking for everyone to pour there ideas for the new project.
A true collaboration of ideas of the entire team.
Heard from a former dev that the game was a true collaboration of the entire company. When they where finishing kill zone they started gathering everybody in a big meeting room asking for everyone to pour there ideas for the new project.
A true collaboration of ideas of the entire team.
Heard from a former dev that the game was a true collaboration of the entire company. When they where finishing kill zone they started gathering everybody in a big meeting room asking for everyone to pour there ideas for the new project.
A true collaboration of ideas of the entire team.
People have being saying how crazy their random encounters are
http://kotaku.com/horizon-zero-dawn-the-kotaku-review-1792538336
I remember Phil Spencer's response about that review from Forza Horizon 3 that was literally awful (someone gave it a 4 or some shit like that) and Phil said something like "There are a few sites that give low scores to some games because all they want is clickbait"
And this will never stop, regardless the game.
pd sorry for my english, it's not my native language but I hope u can understand what I'm saying!
I remember Phil Spencer's response about that review from Forza Horizon 3 that was literally awful (someone gave it a 4 or some shit like that) and Phil said something like "There are a few sites that give low scores to some games because all they want is clickbait"
And this will never stop, regardless the game.
pd sorry for my english, it's not my native language but I hope u can understand what I'm saying!
No, I just really value Eurogamer's opinion, they are absolutely my favorite site for reviews. And that Horizon isn't a particularly original game is a totally fair criticism from what I'm reading, granted I have not played the game. Just because I am personally burnt out on this kind of game doesn't make me biased, i'm sure lots of people are going to love it.
God, NeoGAF is so fucking insecure about review scores. It's very odd.
People have being saying how crazy their random encounters are
http://kotaku.com/horizon-zero-dawn-the-kotaku-review-1792538336
I think the bigger issue with USGamer's score is their choice of reviewer. I get that not everyone will like the same things, but it would be the same as if I was assigned a review for a racing game. I should recuse myself if I was at all a decent reviewer as I do not get any enjoyment from racing games. Having me give Forza or Gran Turismo a 5/10 as I'm bored after a race or two is pointless and really makes USGamer seem like a low tier publication.
I don't think you got my point. Given that she seems to be a freelance writer, I doubt she has much choice in which games she's reviewing. if you're a staff writer, you have some freedom not to take certain games; if you're freelancing, you likely need to take what you can get. Playing a game you think you might not like is worth it if you need to pay rent, you know? And the opinion of someone who generally doesn't like a genre is valuable too; sometimes that leads to them saying "I don't generally like this, but this game is more accessible" (etc.), which has led me to try games I wouldn't have normally been into before.
So if the places she's writing for are fine with her writing and the score that's given (assuming they didn't determine the score and not her, as some publications do), that's that. There's no reason to get worked up about it.
No, I just really value Eurogamer's opinion, they are absolutely my favorite site for reviews. And that Horizon isn't a particularly original game is a totally fair criticism from what I'm reading, granted I have not played the game. Just because I am personally burnt out on this kind of game doesn't make me biased, i'm sure lots of people are going to love it.
God, NeoGAF is so fucking insecure about review scores. It's very odd.
Sounds similar to Valve's cabal process. Coming up on sufficient proof that this is a fantastic way to design/iterate on games.
I don't like rhythm games and I loved Thumper. I don't like visual novels but VA-11 HALL-A is great
Not being experienced or not liking a genre doesn't you shouldn't review it, especially if it's an blurry line between genres/gateway thing. An open world game with a focus on straight-up action and streamlined RPG elements is certainly in that category
Differently informed, and no less validNot knowing the history of a genre due to not playing in the genre will effect your perception of the game, and make it objectively less informed.
No, I just really value Eurogamer's opinion, they are absolutely my favorite site for reviews. And that Horizon isn't a particularly original game is a totally fair criticism from what I'm reading, granted I have not played the game. Just because I am personally burnt out on this kind of game doesn't make me biased, i'm sure lots of people are going to love it.
God, NeoGAF is so fucking insecure about review scores. It's very odd.
and some people here felt the engadget review wasnt up to par either.I know Engadget isn't on MC, nor do they assign scores to games, but their reviewer isn't particularly fond of open world games, yet came away enamored by it. While I understand what you're getting at, there's nothing to suggest the reviewer doesn't play open world titles outside of what she's reviewed, so it's a flawed premise.
Gonna beat Zelda in MC scores.
I guess that's why it's such a mix of influences.
This is why I need this shit. When playing Destiny I loved running into random battles and just jumping in.
I haven't played Witcher 3 yet, but can anyone confirm that the same kind of random encounters happen in that game?
Heard from a former dev that the game was a true collaboration of the entire company. When they where finishing kill zone they started gathering everybody in a big meeting room asking for everyone to pour there ideas for the new project.
A true collaboration of ideas of the entire team.
Not secure at all, but taking one reviews word as gospel over everyone elses is just weird, multiple opinions is always the best way to gauge things.
So that one review totally makes your mind up? How about GB and Polygon, it usually takes a lot to impress them.
I'm going to miss Hermen's swagger and stage presence at press events and in interviews. Dude is one of the best speakers and presenters in the industry.
No, I just really value Eurogamer's opinion, they are absolutely my favorite site for reviews. And that Horizon isn't a particularly original game is a totally fair criticism from what I'm reading, granted I have not played the game. Just because I am personally burnt out on this kind of game doesn't make me biased, i'm sure lots of people are going to love it.
God, NeoGAF is so fucking insecure about review scores. It's very odd.
Game is shipping which means Guerrilla will be quiet for awhile... I should clear that up hahaWait. Where is he going?
This is why I need this shit. When playing Destiny I loved running into random battles and just jumping in.
I haven't played Witcher 3 yet, but can anyone confirm that the same kind of random encounters happen in that game?
Haven't read Polygon, but Jeff clearly loved the game but said the design is very similar to Far Cry. All I said was that I'm currently very un-interested in this kind of experience as I've played lots of games recently with a similar fundamental design. Please stop trying to tell me that I'm somehow wrong for having this opinion.
People were saying March 2nd in a another thread. I think it was the one discussing the press receiving their Switches for hardware reviews.When can we expect reviews for Zelda to drop?