Manmademan
Member
How does her not liking the game make the review itself poor? And what consensus? Was this review posted long after the others? Because if it wasn't, how could the writer have any idea what this consensus was such that she needed to justify it? How would she know that her opinion was going to differ so much?
(I also disagree with the need to justify it, and I think people would just be picking on that justification if it was there, but...)
Let me put it this way. Consensus exists because the vast majority of reviewers are picking up on the same things about the game (or the movie, or the book) and crediting those things appropriately. How does it control? How is the voice acting? How is the story? How does it perform technically?
taking everything into account, virtually every review is falling somewhere between 8 and 10. generally "very good to great" territory.
If you have one review that manages to play through the same game and give it a 5- which by USgamer's standards is a failing grade- then either that reviewer missed the positives that everyone else happened to notice, or doesn't consider those things relevant in reviewing the game. Neither one of those things is positive. Is it POSSIBLE to have a review that significantly diverges from consensus but still be valid? Sure. But the case for that isn't made here. Everything that goes into making a game worth playing seems to have gone out of the window in favor of "I don't care about this character" which is the exact same complaint that happened with "I am setsuna" which was ALSO well below consensus in her review. This isn't an isolated incident, this is how that woman rates games.
Who's this we that thinks acting like that is a rational and mature way to behave? It sure doesn't include me. The way people whine about IGN's reviews, years apart, with different reviewers, annoys the hell out of me. There's nothing to "excuse" because there was little to no problem to begin with. The fact that people still do it all this time later is embarrassing, not a sign that everyone should get in line. (Particularly as certain people have decided to use those same reviews to complain about good indie games getting praise, but I digress.)
Furthermore: I love God Hand. God Hand's fucking weird. I can see why someone gave it a 4. In general, I love a lot of game that are janky messes and I can see why people review them badly. "Good" is subjective. We may enjoy different things. If you really do not enjoy a thing you might have a hard time seeing the "good" in it that I love. And I should not need to keep literally everyone else in the world in mind when writing about my feelings on a game.
Then we have nothing to discuss really, since the IGN 4.0 and 2.0 scores on those two games weren't defensible. enjoy your day.