I genuinely like your response btw, I merely disagree and appreciate the effort you put in the post.
I appreciate your response too. I think the 'culture wars' thing is designed to feed this kind of balkanisation and the best thing you can do is calmly compare and contrast thoughts and opinions. To respond directly to some of yours:
Secondly, who is anyone to tell others that they must disclose their intent behind an artistic choice?
Absolutely no-one, but when you publish your art, people are free to interpret and construe it as they want. You may want to respond and clarify your intent, or you may prefer to be elusive - that's your call. But your freedom to express yourself through art is balanced by other people's freedom to critique it. That's fair and equitable.
This is a level of scrutiny i'd rather not be a part of, artist are free to create what they want.
They are indeed, but I think we have to be frank: massive mainstream video games are not one person's unvarnished artistic vision - they're products, developed by huge teams with massive investment from different stakeholders. They're designed with a consumer in mind and consumers are entirely within their rights to reject a product on any grounds: whether it be cost, quality, or indeed the values the company is aligned with. Most of us have a handful of companies that we won't buy from 'on principle' and I don't think you can argue against that individual freedom without impinging upon the principles of the free market or the right to free association.
What would the solution even be btw? Put a lie detector test on all artist and ask them to pledge allegiance to some idea to, you know make sure they make what you want and not an "agenda"? Would that not be forcing someone to create something or? lol I kid with the lolz, but genuinely, what on earth would the fucking solution even be to what you are saying?
I don't think that's necessary, I think the simple solution is for Western middle-class metropolitan media types to take a humility and check and realise that their political outlook doesn't represent some apex of human morality and that they are not uniquely positioned to educate the poor, ignorant masses. The arrogance is colossal - the assumption, to take an outsized example, that the Western view of gender non-conformism (a phenomenon that has been observed and understood in a thousand different ways over the course of human history) now has a single universal explanation that (wouldn't you believe it, America) is best addressed through medical intervention takes an immense level of hubris. Instead of pretending to be the 'educated' ones, they might do better to admit that gender is a complex social paradigm that everyone is forced to interact with and, as such, everyone has a right to take a view on.
The people livid at the 'woke' movement are, in the main, unfussed about women, people or colour or even people from gender minorities being represented in mainstream media. They're simply tired of being told that what they want and everything they care about is wrong, has no value, is childish, pathetic, disgusting, degrading, harmful, bigoted, ignorant, or problematic. They're tired of the moral high-handedness of people on six-figure salaries with massive social and media influence telling people who have next to fuck all that they need to consider their privilege and that because they represent the majority of people in a particular country, their views are worthless.
Stop taking that approach with ordinary, well-meaning and otherwise decent human beings and you might well find that you'll get far less pushback.
And for the benefit of doubt, I'm saying all this as a tree-hugging, vegan socialist who works in mainstream media.