BurnOutBrighter
Banned
Oh man. People are so cynical that they think it'll still have online requirements 

Can we get those more explicit statements in the OP? People seem pretty desperate for this to be something it isn't to the point that people are saying DOESN'T PROVE NUTTIN COULD BE LIKE XBONE right under a post containing the quote "Never even considered it."
Compare what Cerny said to what Microsoft said instead of just answering to something I did not say.
Technically the same could be said about the Xbox One (if MS sticks to the 24 hour requirement) since it isn't "always". On top of that the Xbox One doesn't need online in order to function (e.g.: watching blu-ray movies).
Want to believe this but at the same time it fits typical PR vagueness.
Guess we'll get a direct answer soon though.
this doesn't mean anything at all.
Xbox One isn't "always connected" in that sense neither.
Come on Sony. Spill all out.
"PlayStation 4 can still be enjoyed old school without an Internet connection at all."
"PlayStation 4 can still be enjoyed old school without an Internet connection at all."
You don't need a connection at all
http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/2013/03/20/michael-denny/
Even taking back a step from here, PlayStation 4 can still be enjoyed old school without an Internet connection at all.
You don't need a connection at all
http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/2013/03/20/michael-denny/
You guys are missing the forest for the trees. Yeah Sony doesn't require for a persistent online connection bet remember they are leaving it up to Publishers on a game by game basis. So essentially if a publisher wants verification every 24hours then that's what we'll have to deal with.
Taking this as fact (I don't think Sony can afford to backtrack on something as important as this so long after the announcement), I don't see how devs could impose used games DRM if you can keep your console offline whenever you want.
Sounds a lot like what we heard from MS before they announced their 24h DRM.
It begins. This place is going to be so full of shit we will all need shovels.Damn, people are trying pretty hard.
I remember something else from MS before the 24h thing...
Damn, people are trying pretty hard.
Taking this as fact (I don't think Sony can afford to backtrack on something as important as this so long after the announcement), I don't see how devs could impose used games DRM if you can keep your console offline whenever you want.
No, Microsoft said it doesn't have to be always online but it does require a Internet connection.
Sony have said the PS4 doesn't require a internet connection at all and can be played old school if you so desire.
It's been a confusing time since the Xbox One reveal, no doubt about that. The campaign started in response to Kneigly(sp) I think saying he heard PS4 would have a similar DRM set up, but of course as we can now see that seems unfounded.
And the great thing is the reason given is so wonderfully open and inclusive. Of course you wouldn't require an internet connection whatsoever, because there are other countries than the USA and they're not all up on reliable internet yet! Imagine that, policies dictated for a wide world!
I'll take a 'install the game but leave the disc in as a key, if you want to play without a disc in the drive you have to register the game online and then cannot resell'
Sony has a patent on disc-based DRM.
Interestingly, I also spoke to a Sony source elsewhere at the event this evening who told me that the anti used-game patent discovered last month was actually nothing to do with PlayStation 4 at all.
Yeah I know about MS but doesn't require an internet connection isn't what I'm getting from that statement.
My point was that 'not always online' is PR spin.
You guys are missing the forest for the trees. Yeah Sony doesn't require for a persistent online connection bet remember they are leaving it up to Publishers on a game by game basis. So essentially if a publisher wants verification every 24hours then that's what we'll have to deal with.
Compare what Cerny said to what Microsoft said instead of just answering to something I did not say.
think its pretty clear, PS4 wont require an internet connection so its nothing like the Xbox One what requires 1 time connection every 24hrs....is that so hard to follow ?
Not sure how many times I have posted this now, it was already confirmed the day of the PS4 reveal that the PS4 doesn't require a internet connection at all.
http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/2013/03/20/michael-denny/
Michael Denny So I think two of the other pillars we talked about in-terms of design were simplicity and immediacy. Even taking back a step from here, PlayStation 4 can still be enjoyed old school without an Internet connection at all. So it depends what level you want to use these feature sets at. So with simple and immediacy we want it so that everything is one button click away, for example. And immediacy takes down these barriers that can be frustrating to gamers between the player getting access to the content.
Technically the same could be said about the Xbox One (if MS sticks to the 24 hour requirement) since it isn't "always". On top of that the Xbox One doesn't need online in order to function (e.g.: watching blu-ray movies).
Want to believe this but at the same time it fits typical PR vagueness.
Guess we'll get a direct answer soon though.
Plenty of wiggle room there. Why not just say it works the same as it does today if that's the case? June 10th....
Not sure how many times I have posted this now, it was already confirmed the day of the PS4 reveal that the PS4 doesn't require a internet connection at all.
http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co.uk/2013/03/20/michael-denny/
It begins. This place is going to be so full of shit we will all need shovels.
XBONE doesnt either just every 24 hrs, stop being secretive and just spill it Sony
"PlayStation 4 can still be enjoyed old school without an Internet connection at all."
Why are people trying to act like statements like this are misleading, confusing PR speak? Sony couldn't possibly be any more clear about this.
Half the time it seriously seems like people want Sony to drop the ball at E3 as much as Microsoft did with their announcement. This shouldn't be a console war thing, this should be about consumers not wanting to get fucked over.
Compare what Cerny said to what Microsoft said instead of just answering to something I did not say.
"PlayStation 4 can still be enjoyed old school without an Internet connection at all."
Why are people trying to act like statements like this are misleading, confusing PR speak? Sony couldn't possibly be any more clear about this.
Plenty of wiggle room there. Why not just say it works the same as it does today if that's the case? June 10th....
Sure you can...For a day at a time until reality hits you to face
xbone is the most ethnocentric console of all time
This is from the latest Game Informer
GI- Rumor claims that Microsoft's console will require an always-online Internet connection to play games. In previous interviews, you've stated that that's not the case with PS4. Did you ever consider an always-online connection for the PS4, and if so, why did you decide against it?
Yosp- Did we consider it? No, we didn't consider it. The main reason being that many countries don't have robust Internet connections. It makes sense for people to have Internet connections to play online games, but for offline games there are many countries that we saw do not really have robust internet.
GI- So that wasn't even a consideration?
Yosp- Right. We didn't even consider that.
Haha. So basically the same as Xbox. Nice.