To me, it's weird that people judge Tenabe's ability to create a Metroid game by Federation Force. The game was an obvious spin off, not meant to be exactly like a traditional Metroid game. It was about the Federation and had co-op, a soccer game, etc...For what it was, I heard it was a good game. Spin-off quality.
Mostly I think, it is an aesthetic worry. At least that is at the core of my doubts.
Tanabe wants to a) focus on the Galactic federation soldiers and b) focus on Samus as one of a series of bounty hunters with super abilities.
Hunters, Prime 3, and Federation Force all are part of this fiction. So is the Metroid Prime 4 he teased.
The thing is, what a lot of core Metroid fans want is a moodier, darker science fiction take on Metroid, more in line with the way they see the series and more in line with, say, Alien. Tanabe wants a sort of super hero cartoon take on Metroid, which cheeses a lot of us off. The voice of Prime 3 was god-awful.
There is also the underlying "Tanabe wants to make Metroid more of a shooter" fear. Both Hunters and Federation Force feed into this a lot. As does putting Prime 3 out as a FPS instead of an FPA and the inclusion of objective driven shooter segments in that game. The thing is, Prime 3 is still pretty damn Metroid in its moment-to-moment gameplay and as far as structural "issues" it has the same status as Fusion.
Prime 2 also has similar stuctural "issues." And personally, they are issues. I like Fusion and Prime 3 less because of the limited interconnection and the "story-based" gating of the map.
The original Prime and SM have a much better environmental puzzle and gadget flow, imo.
The thing is though...how much of the devolution in this regard is Tanabe and how much is it Retro?
Prime 2 spoke to me as if Retro kind of wanted to make a Zelda game with its temple structure. Prime 3 spoke to me as if Retro kind of wanted to make Halo with its stronger shooter focus, achievements, and generic space marines.
Yup, spot on. But it's hard to see that for most through all the red from those blood-shot rage eyes.
I've always been open to FF being a fine game. I really don't see how that means it is a good direction for Metroid, though.
Really, the counter-rage can get quite obnoxious too.
The backlash against FF is largely understandable. Did the game under the Metroid license deserve it all? Probably not. Never played it because I was not in the market for squad shooters on my 3DS or elsewhere. Was it a troubling use of the Metroid license that showed that Nintendo perhaps does not grasp what people want from Metroid? Yes. And it is perfectly reasonable to not support that direction. It isn't a case that every one who didn't want or try FF and did want something else is a raging, madcap imbecile with blood shot eyes.