8BitsAtATime
Member
Hahaha I do.You can kinda tell who actually knows and watches soccer and the casual fans who only watched because the US was in the final. Aint nobody trying to watch regular season women's soccer.
Hahaha I do.You can kinda tell who actually knows and watches soccer and the casual fans who only watched because the US was in the final. Aint nobody trying to watch regular season women's soccer.
Cherry picking stats: America's greatest sport of all.
Apparently, people become sports media journalists when they fail statistics.
Apples, meet oranges.
Anybody wanna guess what the US overnights would have been had the final been Germany vs. Japan?
It's good news for women's soccer - don't get me wrong, you're not going to have a league form up, etc etc. But it's good for growth of the game in the US on an amateur level. EA adding the teams to the latest version seems like a fairly brilliant move.
Ann Coulter's not going to be happy about this.
To everyone saying comparing the two doesn't make sense since the NBA finals and Stanley Cup finals are a series of games, what if you were to average them out?
I think this game would still top both.
Well yea when it's the Blackhawks and the Lightning what do you expect?
To everyone saying comparing the two doesn't make sense since the NBA finals and Stanley Cup finals are a series of games, what if you were to average them out?
I think this game would still top both.
How many people watched England v Japan?
What if we averaged total playoff ratings vs total tournament viewership? How many people watched England v Japan?
Well, NBA finals and Stanley cup are a series, world cup final a single game and it's not anual
4shureKind of like if the Football match were Germany and Argentina, amirite?
Real talk: why aren't the soccer finals a series, even if it's just best of 3 or 5? It's not like it's that much wear on your body, especially if hockey and basketball guys can do 7 game series. I'm happy USA won but it feels kinda like a bit of a fluke.
Real talk: why aren't the soccer finals a series, even if it's just best of 3 or 5? It's not like it's that much wear on your body, especially if hockey and basketball guys can do 7 game series. I'm happy USA won but it feels kinda like a bit of a fluke.
No wear on your body?Real talk: why aren't the American Football finals a series, even if it's just best of 3 or 5? It's not like it's that much wear on your body, especially if hockey and basketball guys can do 7 game series. I'm happy WhoeverTheHeck won but it feels kinda like a bit of a fluke.
Real talk: why aren't the American Football finals a series, even if it's just best of 3 or 5? It's not like it's that much wear on your body, especially if hockey and basketball guys can do 7 game series. I'm happy WhoeverTheHeck won but it feels kinda like a bit of a fluke.
No wear on your body?
Ok.
I think soccer is one sport where it would be possible.
Real talk: why aren't the American Football finals a series, even if it's just best of 3 or 5? It's not like it's that much wear on your body, especially if hockey and basketball guys can do 7 game series. I'm happy WhoeverTheHeck won but it feels kinda like a bit of a fluke.
Where's the big MLS boost we've been hearing about for 20 years? Where's the massive anticipation for the Gold Cup?
I wouldn't mind seeing that at least once. Love the playoffs, but having a crazy one night atmosphere would be something.NBA and NHL 1 game playoffs. Do it!
NBA and NHL 1 game playoffs. Do it!
-Americans will cheer anything America-related because America
Makes sense to me.
The NFL has extreme wear on your body. More than most sports. So much that the average player only lasts 3 seasons. Or are you saying this ironically in that soccer has a lot of wear as well? Cause I would agree with that.
Football: 1.25 miles for receivers and cornerbacks
Football players dont have a lot of time to travel very far. According to the Wall Street Journal, the average NFL game includes only 11 minutes of actual playing time. Receivers and cornerbacks run the most at just over one mile a game. Thats still an impressive feat considering 11 massive and highly trained athletes would prefer they run as little as possible.
Soccer: 7 miles
A large field, a fast moving ball, and rare substitutions mean soccer players can expect to log some heavy mileage over 90-plus minutes. Midfielders tend to run the most, sometimes reaching nearly 9.5 miles, according to SportVU.
Could do that too. How many people sat through those earlier round 4-0 blowouts in the NBA playoffs this year?
I find it astonishing why people get so defensive about soccer gaining traction here.
I could ask why people are so desperate to remind us all about the runaway momentum of soccer in the US for the last 20. I find that equally astonishing. Like repeating it enough times is going to make it come true.
1994, 1999, David Beckham, 2014. We get it, the revolution is happening any minute now.
I'd imagine they are excited about it. There's a difference between that and putting people excited about it down by comparing it to establish Leagues.I could ask why people are so desperate to remind us all about the runaway momentum of soccer in the US for the last 20. I find that equally astonishing. Like repeating it enough times is going to make it come true.
1994, 1999, David Beckham, 2014. We get it, the revolution is happening any minute now.
You're the only person in this thread bringing it up....
I'd imagine they are excited about it. There's a difference between that and putting people excited about it down by comparing it to establish Leagues.
I could ask why people are so desperate to remind us all about the runaway momentum of soccer in the US for the last 20. I find that equally astonishing. Like repeating it enough times is going to make it come true.
1994, 1999, David Beckham, 2014. We get it, the revolution is happening any minute now.
The entire article exists simply as something to wag around as proof of something. Otherwise it would just say how many people watched the game and end it there instead of comparing it to the NBA or NHL.
lol, tell that to the person who wrote the article.
1994, 1999, David Beckham, 2014. We get it, the revolution is happening any minute now.
If people wouldn't disagree with it/dismiss it (of which there are a bunch of examples in this thread of people doing just that).
The entire article exists simply as something to wag around as proof of something. Otherwise it would just say how many people watched the game and end it there instead of comparing it to the NBA or NHL.
Now we're just in a chicken/egg debate. Who started what and when. All I know is what the article is trying to do.
Comparing it to the NBA or NHL is to put the numbers into perspective. Saying 20+ million people watched it doesn't mean much until you can compare it to something.
You're one of the only people taking issue with it, and it's actually funny to watch. They are good numbers for a women's sport, and for a sport that isn't anywhere near the overall popularity of the other sports in this country.
We get it. You don't like it. Get over it.
I could ask why people are so desperate to remind us all about the runaway momentum of soccer in the US for the last 20. I find that equally astonishing. Like repeating it enough times is going to make it come true.
1994, 1999, David Beckham, 2014. We get it, the revolution is happening any minute now.
Just pointing out cherry picking and flawed statistics. But, like I said, the revolution is coming any minute.