Devkit leak doesnt give priority to one leak over the other
Just to give you a counter example: Whats to say Benjii 12.9TF leak isnt from a Navi chip?
Because Benjis info is from December 2012, when SOC containing Navi and Zen2 couldnt have been tapped out. Additionally, it absolutely doesnt fit timeline compared to PS4, where first real SOC dev kits get into hands of 3rd party in late 2012, year before console was retail.
If they had 12.9TF SOCs by late 2012, there would be no need to sit on it for 2 years before releasing new console, as that chip is as good as done.
Timeline goes like this :
1. Gonzalo engineering sample appears in January. CPU base clock - 1600MHZ containing Ariel ID and GPU clocked at 1GHZ
If you follow AMD you will notice ES having seriously low clock speeds
2. Gonzalo APU re appears, this time as QS (quality sample) in April. CPU is 8 core running 3.2GHZ and GPU running 1.8GHZ
3. Sony officially announces PS5 where Cerny mentions that current Dev Kits are "slow", duo to SSD tech having alot of propriatary parts and current dev kits not having it (essentially, PCs?
4. Reddit post by guy, cleary from Asia (as he "celebrated" "Cake Day" on 21st, while post was made on 20th of May GMT) leaks alleged PS5 dev kit from OQA. Memory types, die size, SSD and VRM controllers. His avatar from Reddit is electric circuit. Deletes username 2 days later.
5. What is Gonzalo? If Gonzalo boost is 1.8GHZ, and 5700 that uses 180W max is 1.72GHZ max boost, how can this APU be big one? It makes 0 sense. Either its a big one, with lower clocks, or its smaller one with higher clocks.
I want to add that
NOTHING we know of Navi chip - die size, TDP, CU arrangement etc. tells us to expect chip with 50+ CUs and RT cores, especially if clocked that high. This is repeat of 2012 and time when we expected 3+ TF GPU machines (as 7970 had 3.8TF) and got 1.2TF and 1.8TF ones.