I literally just watched it, its identicle on both. If you knew what you were talking about, you would no that the higher the framerate, the less tearing becomes obvious, as is the case here, very tiny tears that you can barely see, compared to massive tears when you have a game without vsync at a low framerate.
The video shows the opposite of "the less tearing become obvious".
Like i said, you are seeing what you want to see.
It blow my mind that you can see half of the screen being cut off.
Yeap Rainbow 6 video... my pic is just a example to how it is the worst screen tearing game since Sniper Elite 3 on Xbox One.
the mental gymnastics to believe this is outstanding...
Competition is great for us as gamers. As a PS5/PC gamer, GP is going to do nothing but benefit me
I think you underestimate the ability to buy the games you want. Not everyone wants to play whatever is on gamepass or PS now.
This is what I'd like to see from Sony, full back catalogue of games upgraded via online ML with higher Res, FPS and added effects such as RT all part of PSN Subscription, say PSN platinum a slight increase in cost.
And you are looking at Game Pass for what it is now (backlog of old games) vs what it will become (new, hyped Day 1 titles monthly / weekly / whatever).
When gamepass becomes a service that has every game on it day one for a set fee, I’ll be all over it.
Hype for Outriders? Where?
It could very well become that by next year depending on if they release games you like. But when 23 studios working full time to feed the GP machine with exclusives no doubt they will start to get a lot of gamer's attention that initially wrote off Game Pass as 'old games for cheap'
The internet.
And you’re looking at the price you paid. ($1 for 3 years) and not what it’ll go up to in the future. But hey, you guys wanted the zeni catalog exclusive...
Right. It’s first party games isn’t it? Are they going to have GTA6 and CoD and NBA 2K on day one? That’s a deal!
Mental gymnastics to think timed exclusives locking content you don't own away from other platforms is better than owning the IP and keeping that IP for your customers is worse. What IS better is putting games like Outriders on Gamepass day one. If a company was going to pay for content this is the way to do it.
There is no hypocrisy to dislike a company taking away IP they don't own from other platforms vs buying the IP and providing it to your customers. Sony does not own Street Fighter or Final Fantasy yet those IP are blocked because Sony pays to block them. MS owns Doom, Fallout and The Elder Scrolls. Sony has as much right to them as MS does to Ratchet and Clank or God of War. At least you don't have to buy an Xbox if you still want to play MS games. Options are nice."Business is business".
But he fails to see his own hyprocisy (which is actually very common) that the IP rights holder is allowed to do anything they want with the IP, so if they decided to take the cash and approve the timed exclusivity. How is that any different? 'Business is business' after all.
At least with timed exclusive the game will be accessible to all eventually.
But apparently this is far worse and anti consumer.
Said it perfectly!
dude... buying out the ip locks it to a system timed exclusivity get it to the player at a later date... why is this so hard to grasp....how do you as a gamer benefit from this... jesus its as if Microsoft pays you for this...
Thinking about it - Sony had those 2 exclusives, Fallout as part of the PS collection and rumours of other stuff.
He can wait a little while to play Deathloop on Xbox. Nobody will ever be able to play Starfield on a Playstation - that version has now been scrapped. But somehow, he is the one at disadvantage.
Fuck the end result, buying a publisher wholesale makes it fair.
Totally agree with this. From what I saw of the trailers and what I saw in the Demo itself, I definitely feel it's a GamePass and PSPlus likely type title. Nothing BAD about it and don't mean it that way, but it didn't come across as a "full" AAA big time title to me. At least from what I've seen. Which would make it a good candidate for these programs.
I never defended any price hike and I never bought a Kinect so you are 0 for 2. You are right it is pure business to block IP you don't own from platforms vs investing in the company, buying the IP and hiring all the employees. I always thought that people here preferred the investment route but perhaps I am wrong. I guess people here are perfectly fine with the MS/Zenimax deal just like I am. My deepest apologies. I prefer investment and I prefer Outriders-like deals where games hit Gamepass day 1. Much better than purely blocking things from other platforms. I'm sure even Sony fanatics would agree.
Yup you got me! MS had different practices years ago. MS also didn't release games day and date on PC. MS also didn't put Dead rising 3 on Gamepass. I prefer the way MS does business TODAY vs years back. I wonder if any other platform holders will change?
I'd like to see some receipts on outriders not being AAA.
You are aware they are still doing it now, right? There's timed exclusives all over the place. You don't seem to hate that though, weirdly.
i was thinking of playing titanfall the first one on my ps5 just so i got a better understanding of the series... oh wait
I do not like it when any company blocks IP they don't own from other platforms. I have NEVER said I like when MS does it and did not like it when Sony does it. That would be hypocrisy. People here were comparing Sony blocking FF to MS buying Zenimax and THAT I do not have a problem with. Buying IP and supporting your platform is not the same as simply denying IP you don't own. It is not that hard to understand. Game pass is the way MS chose to spend money with regards to Outriders. I prefer that to blocking IP.
Didn't even see the issue with the price hike.
I was wrong about Kinect when I made my comment 8 years ago. I still didn't buy it. I thought MS was too stubborn to remove a horrible device. Looks like I am not the Xbox fanatic I was made out to be and MS was a better company than I gave them credit for. Still has nothing to do with Zenimax vs blocking IP which was the original point.It's not exactly had to search in this place dude. But I'm afraid you did..
Certainly were defending Kinect hard back then!
Never going to drop it, how did that prediction work out?
Didn't even see the issue with the price hike.
So.. 2 for 2.
What do you think the money for timed exclusivity is used for? Is that not going to be money that is reinvested into the company? Or cover development costs?
You're argument is truly pitiful. Just because you want to defend Microsoft, anything they do, is all ok. Sad.
Hardly an endorsement or defense. "Nobody likes a price hike but this is easily circumvented". Turns out I was right and it was ended. I'll give you a 1/2 point because it was cool you found something I wrote so long ago so good for you!
i take it you didn't play the demo
If that game is AAA then the devs had worst issues than CDPR with Cyberpunk.
