The two biggest gaming forums = Reset and Gaf. This topic has been the biggest thing on them since the AMD leaks.
The biggest gaming YouTube channel DF did a video on it basically saying that it indeed looks like the PS5 will be a 9.2tflop console and that the XSX will have 56cus and will be more powerful.
Type into Google PS5 news, and the 9.2tflop issue comes up.
Go onto Twitter and look at what people are saying about PS5 and it's all about the AMD leaks.
Just because soccer mum Betty down the road doesnt know about it, all the hardcore gamers who are first adopters, spend the most money, buy the most games, they well and truly know about it.
This is not quantifiable and you have given no evidence that "all the hardcore gamers" are aware. The fact that a substantial amount of those hardcore games are skeptical and are just waiting for the official reveal is also a major counterargument against this bogus claim. Try again.
Not at all. The talk about Sony having 4gigs came about when Sony actually was going to use 4gig. Their decision to change was so close to the reveal, it wasnt worth making anything of it.
So my point still stands. Not sure why you're so hung up about this...
And with regards to RT, you are actually proving my point for me. Sony DID address it. It only took 10 days for Sony to set the record straight. The AMD leaks have been out for far longer than the RT question was. It's got FAR more press and buzz than the RT thing ever did, and Sony hasn't gone anywhere near setting the record straight.
Yes, the evidence that refutes your claim somehow supports your claim. Fantastic mental gymnastics. 10 days is not immediate.
Most likely because the record is straight. The 36CUs is what the machine is.
Continue on with this Affirming the Consequent fallacy. If you repeat it
ad nauseam, it must be true.
So you points prove my side of the argument, so im not sure why you keep pushing them.
And with a side of the Proof by Assertion fallacy.
Here's another piece of counterevidence. After the XB1 reveal, rumors began floating around that the PS4 would also use the same type of DRM. Sony did not immediately shoot down this rumor. Instead, they stayed silent until E3. This is why Ethomaz's argument has some merit because Sony has intentionally stayed silent to gain a strategic advantage.
Your claim would only hold water if Sony has established a consistent history like what MS has done with the announcement of MAU over the course of this generation. However, you have provided no evidence of this pattern and are going strictly off of conjecture.
Prior to the AMD leaks, these forums and gaming circles were all buzzing about how Sony was gonna be 13tflops, and MS was less powerful. It was all blue skies for Sony. All the questions were about MS.
Of which they don't even have that far of a reach as the audience of those forums and gaming circles are a fraction of the core gamers. And there you go again with the qualifiers. How much is "all buzzing"? It sounds like total exaggeration to conveniently fit your conjecture.
If you honestly think the AMD leaks hasn't totally flipped the PS5 narrative on these forums then you havent been reading them.
It has had an effect, and not a good one. If Sony could click their fingers and make that AMD leak disappear, do you think they would be clicking their fingers?
"These forums" of which aren't representative of the core audience. You have no quantifiable evidence. Therefore, I can simply reject your claim as you lack anything that is first-hand or substantial.
Do you even English? Do you know what steam means? You are literally trying too hard here.
No goal posts have moved. Having more steam means it is far bigger. So that means that the RT talk was minor compared to the AMD leak. Like the AMD leak is 100 times more than the RT.
You are moving the goalposts because now you're talking about "steam" to shift the conversation away from my counterexample. Where's this large amounts of "steam"? Tweets? Articles from non-gaming sites? Is it as big as the DRM fiasco with the Xbox One?
Throwing out a bunch of qualifiers is not proof and until you show otherwise, it is a bunch of crockshit.