Shaki12345
Banned
Gonna get so high with MKW first time playing.
Agreed, but then, I'm part of the problem.Most likely we'll see foldable screen tech get used in a way that lets handheld gaming devices return to being clamshell or clamshell-like, and thus more pocketable. I imagine something like the newer Razr phones
![]()
But with controls somehow tucked away inside. It's hard to say, people's obsession with screen size on these devices seems to be limitless, even folding something the size of the Switch 2 in half would make it more portable, but still quite large.
Agreed, but then, I'm part of the problem.Most likely we'll see foldable screen tech get used in a way that lets handheld gaming devices return to being clamshell or clamshell-like, and thus more pocketable. I imagine something like the newer Razr phones
![]()
But with controls somehow tucked away inside. It's hard to say, people's obsession with screen size on these devices seems to be limitless, even folding something the size of the Switch 2 in half would make it more portable, but still quite large.
Agreed, but then, I'm part of the problem.Most likely we'll see foldable screen tech get used in a way that lets handheld gaming devices return to being clamshell or clamshell-like, and thus more pocketable. I imagine something like the newer Razr phones
![]()
But with controls somehow tucked away inside. It's hard to say, people's obsession with screen size on these devices seems to be limitless, even folding something the size of the Switch 2 in half would make it more portable, but still quite large.
I don't understand why I have to pay extra for better performance and better graphics (higher resolution, HDR) at all, when I have given them my money to buy Switch 2. An emulator can do that, it's not like they are providing new assets or something. It's just using the system's power that is already there.The paywall is $10 or get NSO + expan. It's worth it if you are revisiting those games.
that isn't how it works. it isn't like the game all of a sudden looks better and runs faster because it is on new hardware. it does take labor to get it there.I don't understand why I have to pay extra for better performance and better graphics (higher resolution, HDR) at all, when I have given them my money to buy Switch 2. An emulator can do that, it's not like they are providing new assets or something. It's just using the system's power that is already there.
I don't understand why I have to pay extra for better performance and better graphics (higher resolution, HDR) at all, when I have given them my money to buy Switch 2. An emulator can do that, it's not like they are providing new assets or something. It's just using the system's power that is already there.
Sony does the same thing with their uprez's of games from PS4 -> PS5. 10$. At least with Nintendo they are giving it for free with their +tier online sub.I don't understand why I have to pay extra for better performance and better graphics (higher resolution, HDR) at all, when I have given them my money to buy Switch 2. An emulator can do that, it's not like they are providing new assets or something. It's just using the system's power that is already there.
I know that it "takes labor to get there". I am not retarded. What I am saying is that this is Nintendo's next console, they have BC and they're charging 470€ for it. Other games provide better performance and better resolution for free. Why are they making me pay extra for the Zelda games? (That's a rhetorical question).that isn't how it works. it isn't like the game all of a sudden looks better and runs faster because it is on new hardware. it does take labor to get it there.
I'd imagine they need to re-render assets at higher resolution where developers may need to tweak or re-export textures and models. adding HDR support requires manual adjusting of lighting, color grading, etc. optimization often requires tweaking memory management. etc.
you seem to think that the game just automatically looks how it does in the Switch 2 trailers because it is on faster hardware and doesn't require any human work, and they are gatekeeping it at $10
don't think that's how it works
R&D on old games that have already been out for quite a while?R&D isn't free.
I think its unreasonable when precedent (Sony) doesn't support your expectations, and Nintendo is always looking to make moneyI don't think it is unreasonable for me to expect that this shit should be free and a "feature" of buying a newer, more powerful system.
I understand, but Nintendo's approach for Switch 2 stands in stark contrast to Sony and Microsoft. Sony offered free next-gen upgrades for numerous PS4 games on PS5 via a simple patch, and Xbox boasts Smart Delivery, getting the best available version of a game at no extra cost.that isn't how it works. it isn't like the game all of a sudden looks better and runs faster because it is on new hardware. it does take labor to get it there.
I'd imagine they need to re-render assets at higher resolution where developers may need to tweak or re-export textures and models. adding HDR support requires manual adjusting of lighting, color grading, etc. optimization often requires tweaking memory management. etc.
you seem to think that the game just automatically looks how it does in the Switch 2 trailers because it is on faster hardware and doesn't require any human work, and they are gatekeeping it at $10
don't think that's how it works
From their perspective, you are absolutely right. I would probably charge even more. From my perspective as a consumer, the only thing I can do is not give them money for that (which I won't). And maintain my opinion that this practice is a fucking rip-off.I think its unreasonable when precedent (Sony) doesn't support your expectations, and Nintendo is always looking to make money
knowing Nintendo, it is totally unreasonable to think they'd ditch a money making opportunity that even Sony takes advantage of
I agree xbox has a better model but if you mention xbox around this forum people automatically dismiss anything they do and instead point at the fact that xbox is "dead" due to their "terrible decisions"I understand, but Nintendo's approach for Switch 2 stands in stark contrast to Sony and Microsoft. Sony offered free next-gen upgrades for numerous PS4 games on PS5 via a simple patch, and Xbox boasts Smart Delivery, getting the best available version of a game at no extra cost.
They are offering the Zelda upgrades for FREE WITH NSO+. There are also added features to these games, unlike other remasters. If you are getting MKW and S2, you might as well get NSO+ so you can play online too. It's not perfect deal, but better than some of Sony's. Nintendo will have completely free w/o NSO upgrades to games like SM Odyssey, Link's Awakening, and Echoes of Wisdom. So, there's that too.Other games provide better performance and better resolution for free. Why are they making me pay extra for the Zelda games? (That's a rhetorical question).
I might be missing some context from the conversation, but Nintendo is offering some free upgrades:to be clear, I think Nintendo could easily offer free upgrades
I'm just highlighting that I would be SHOCKED if they ever did that, because as a corp they seem incredibly greedy
that's why none of this surprised me. I'm just willing to pay the Nintendo tax because I love some of their exclusives a lot
Having to pay NSO+ is not "for free".They are offering the Zelda upgrades for FREE WITH NSO+. There are also added features to these games, unlike other remasters. If you are getting MKW and S2, you might as well get NSO+ so you can play online too. It's not perfect deal, but better than some of Sony's. Nintendo will have completely free w/o NSO upgrades to games like SM Odyssey, Link's Awakening, and Echoes of Wisdom. So, there's that too.
Whatever you say grandpa.From their perspective, you are absolutely right. I would probably charge even more. From my perspective as a consumer, the only thing I can do is not give them money for that (which I won't). And maintain my opinion that this practice is a fucking rip-off.
Anyone who's anyone has NSO+Having to pay NSO+ is not "for free".
Obviously, it's not. I just didn't think anyone was buying a S2 just to play uprezed S1 games.Having to pay NSO+ is not "for free".
It's $20 but I think it's gonna be on NSO+EP won't it'For me the Switch 2 upgrade for Kirby The Forgotten Land absolutely worth the extra $10 since they are adding very substantial content to the game.
Nintendo does too, they're charging if the game have extra features others than just improved graphics and performance. In the case of Zelda, they made a stupid app to hear "Zelda notes" and other additions to them.I understand, but Nintendo's approach for Switch 2 stands in stark contrast to Sony and Microsoft. Sony offered free next-gen upgrades for numerous PS4 games on PS5 via a simple patch, and Xbox boasts Smart Delivery, getting the best available version of a game at no extra cost.
It seems like a missed opportunity, not adding a master mode. Obviously not the same master mode they did in BOTW because that was shit, but I think they were on to something with master mode/new difficulty setting for after you beat gameNintendo does too, they're charging if the game have extra features others than just improved graphics and performance. In the case of Zelda, they made a stupid app to hear "Zelda notes" and other additions to them.
Often, I think Nintendo misses these obvious opportunities that the competition does because they want to do it differently. Can we get achievements already, please? For new features, Nintendo seems to want to be first or not at all. They'd rather try something new than go with what the competition has already done that works.It seems like a missed opportunity, not adding a master mode. Obviously not the same master mode they did in BOTW because that was shit, but I think they were on to something with master mode/new difficulty setting for after you beat game
They implemented it poorly in BOTW and seem to have abandoned in TOTK
Was really hoping that would be something they add with the switch 2 version, as long as it was done better than it was in BOTW
Often, I think Nintendo misses these obvious opportunities that the competition does because they want to do it differently. Can we get achievements already, please? For new features, Nintendo seems to want to be first or not at all. They'd rather try something new than go with what the competition has already done that works.
Same. Funny enough I was mostly a Nintendo kid growing up, but I don't know if that's why I don't give a shit about achievementsNintendo seems to be more geared towards the general masses that are more casual gamers. I don't think that they care about things like achievements. I have been a gamer since the NES days. I own lots of games, but I couldn't care less about achievements. They mean absolutely nothing to me. I assume that Nintendo thinks its broader audience feels this way. I just think that they try to appeal to their largest audience and try not to neglect more hardcore gamers completely.
And 3. and 4. upgrades are bundled with NSO+Expan if you have the original S1 games, correct?Since we're discussing this again, as far as I can tell, Nintendo has a four tier system for Switch 1 game improvements:
1. Games with uncapped framerates and/or dynamic resolution should run/look modestly better out of the box with no patch and no additional charge. So, to build on the earlier discussion, Breath of the Wild should, in theory, stop dropping frames in the Lost Woods, even if you don't download the Switch 2 Edition upgrade, but it won't suddenly be running at 4k/60.
2. Some games are receiving free patches. These patches generally add Switch 2 exclusive functionality (like GameShare, HDR, or mouse support) and/or optimize the game's visuals and performance to make the most of the hardware.
3. Other games have a $10 upgrade fee. These games seem to have substantial visual improvements over the Switch 1 versions (and some, like Metroid Prime 4 seem to have entirely new textures) and possibly some minor additional content (like the smart phone features in the Zelda games).
4. Finally, some games have a $20 upgrade fee, and those games come with what basically amount to DLC packs in addition to visual improvements. Kirby comes with an additional campaign and Mario Party comes with multiple new modes designed around the Switch 2.
Only for the two Zelda gamesAnd 3. and 4. upgrades are bundled with NSO+Expan if you have the original S1 games, correct?
And 3. and 4. upgrades are bundled with NSO+Expan if you have the original S1 games, correct?
Also started on the NES in 1990 and for whatever reason, I would like achievements. Not a deal breaker or anything, but I'd be more motivated to 100% something like SM Wonder if they had a way to show it off out of game in the OS.Nintendo seems to be more geared towards the general masses that are more casual gamers. I don't think that they care about things like achievements. I have been a gamer since the NES days. I own lots of games, but I couldn't care less about achievements. They mean absolutely nothing to me. I assume that Nintendo thinks its broader audience feels this way. I just think that they try to appeal to their largest audience and try not to neglect more hardcore gamers completely.
It's very slow, though. I honestly expected better engagement.These threads are fantastic for building HYPE. It's like an integral part of the ritual of a console release.
Also started on the NES in 1990 and for whatever reason, I would like achievements. Not a deal breaker or anything, but I'd be more motivated to 100% something like SM Wonder if they had a way to show it off out of game in the OS.
I can live without a Switch 2 at launch, but if I don't get my direct purchase invite email in time for DK Bananza, I'll shit my pants. >=|
I can live without a Switch 2 at launch, but if I don't get my direct purchase invite email in time for DK Bananza, I'll shit my pants. >=|
This you?I can put my Switch in my back pocket. No lie. It will stick out but it goes in comfortably and doesn't feel like a brick in my pocket.
Are you all buying screen protectors? I'm not familiar with what kind of material the screen is made out of
My switch 1 had it but idk if it was even necessary
Definitely. It's a must-have. I usually go for amFilm tempered glass, but anything is better than nothing.
I ordered this for mine for $9...
and these for my boys' units for $5.40...
Never tried this type with the pre-mounted protector. Usually I go for the type with the alignment frame.
Quick question boys :
I'm about to create a Nintendo account and I was wondering whether the country of residence you're gonna use during the creation has anything to do with game availability, eShop pricing etc...
My PS5 account for example is Greek and the PSN storefront is obviously Greek - whenever I had a problem though with my account/funds etc PS Italy customer support (which I reside ATM) would always redirect me to PS Greece since, again, the account is Greek.
Having said that, using a Greek account has its benefits/perks since I can usually grab 50€ wallet fund cards for 39.99 on online shops - is it the same thing with Nintendo ?
Also : was gonna order it from Amazon but...they're out of stock atm (they were still available yesterday ffs), is the Nintendo shop ok or shall i get it from somewhere else ?
You can't beat Amazon's refund policies and that's why I usually shop from them but unfortunately they ran out of stock.
Thanks
PS : Nickname and online ID can only be 10 characters long ? Wtf man![]()