ItAintEasyBeinCheesy
it's 4th of July in my asshole
Good on China for winning the games.
Going by gold medals is the absolute worst way to do it. It's a real disregard to all of the silvers and bronzes. Going by total medals isn't much better since it counts all of them as equal, but at least it counts them. To me the only fair way is to weigh all of the medals differently. If you went by an actual system (gold is 3, silver is 2, bronze is 1), China would still beat the US by three I believe.Hypnotoad said:What media outlet in the US doesn't go by total number of medals? It's just ridiculous. The rest of the worlds counts by IOC standards, and so we have one unexpected winner, still impressive, with 51 gold medals.
I don't see where the advantage is gained here. Show me a .gif where he does this on the offensive end to gain advantage and maybe you have a point.lherre said:Lebron again, not more complaining, I swear, for all the people this is travelling in europe (and I think all the world :lol ). I think this is more clear. And like this, a lot in every game.
.
(no more about this).
OpinionatedCyborg said:I don't see where the advantage is gained here. Show me a .gif where he does this on the offensive end to gain advantage and maybe you have a point.
OMG closing ceremonies!
Just Jimmy Page, playing Whole Lotta Love with Leona Lewis (bleurgh) singing.BIVIANO! said:Rumour has it led zeppelin is playing.
chickensoup said:Just Jimmy Page, playing Whole Lotta Love with Leona Lewis (bleurgh) singing.
Our handover ceremony bit is going to be shit :-(
Edit: those strange bike things look cool. I wonder how easy they are to ride?
No, no this is not how sport is refereed. You're Spanish, right? If so, you're surely familiar with advantage reffing in soccer where the ref will overlook a foul because it would deprive the fouled team of a scoring possibility. Or look at a basketball player on a runaway breakaway - if he travels, will the ref make the call? No. If you know any refs, ask them about this and they can explain things better. I can probably refer you to a basketball reffing messageboard too.lherre said:This isn't the point, is a violation or not? If it's a violation the referer has to give the ball to the other team. The rules are the rules, not if you have advantage or not.
Or the rules are different depends on the part of the court you are?
OpinionatedCyborg said:No, no this is not how sport is refereed. You're Spanish, right? If so, you're surely familiar with advantage reffing in soccer where the ref will overlook a foul because it would deprive the fouled team of a scoring possibility. Or look at a basketball player on a runaway breakaway - if he travels, will the ref make the call? No. If you know any refs, ask them about this and they can explain things better. I can probably refer you to a basketball reffing messageboard too.
Could be worse, we could have had Amy Winehouse shooting up live on stage. Maybe they're keeping that treat back till 2012linsivvi said:This is what I don't understand. With so many talented musicians in the UK, they have to pick Leona Lewis to perform in front of the world??? :/
OpinionatedCyborg said:No, no this is not how sport is refereed. You're Spanish, right? If so, you're surely familiar with advantage reffing in soccer where the ref will overlook a foul because it would deprive the fouled team of a scoring possibility. Or look at a basketball player on a runaway breakaway - if he travels, will the ref make the call? No. If you know any refs, ask them about this and they can explain things better. I can probably refer you to a basketball reffing messageboard too.
Yes it does, and that's how refs call games.lherre said:First in basketball this doesn't exist ... (the advantage reffing)
Second, in this case the violation beneficts the infringer ... you don't see this?? In football doesn't benefit the infringer as you explain perfectly ...
I don't know rugby, so I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about. I'm just saying that if team A breaks the rules but by stopping the play it would deprive team B, the play isn't always stopped because team B would be inadvertently penalized, not team A.I won't speak for soccer but in Rugby League you don't get advantage unless the opposing team made a mistake or incurred a penalty that gives you advantage. You can't just cheat and do a forward pass for example just because you're close to the try line. Quite the opposite in fact. Any referee would call a team on that and every fan would be outraged if they didn't.
OpinionatedCyborg said:Yes it does, and that's how refs call games.
lherre said:Lebron again, not more complaining, I swear, for all the people this is travelling in europe (and I think all the world :lol ). I think this is more clear. And like this, a lot in every game.
.
(no more about this).
chickensoup said:Could be worse, we could have had Amy Winehouse shooting up live on stage. Maybe they're keeping that treat back till 2012
Talk to someone who's reffed at the college level and they will tell you games are not called by the book.lherre said:No, doesn't exist.
In the past, I think the marathon has actually finished at the final ceremonies. Barcelona?Shadow780 said:Marathon medals ceremony is always last?
OpinionatedCyborg said:Talk to someone who's reffed at the college level and they will tell you games are not called by the book.
In the NBA there are some blatant examples that I haven't even mentioned. One of them isn't particularly good, but it's really clear: refs who wait to see if the ball goes in after a foul was committed. Ball doesn't go in? Free throws. Ball goes in? Play on. It drives fans crazy, and I don't like it myself. But that's about as clear of an example as I can think of (besides players on breakaways, etc.).
Advantage/disadvantage is the guiding rule behind officiating in nearly all sport.
No, you're simply wrong. Go to a reffing forum and educate yourself. If games were refereed strictly by the book, you'd have stoppages every time a player's shoelace was in the lane for 3 seconds. Or perhaps games regularly last 12 hours in Europe and you're correct. Which is it?lherre said:Well, and I repeat that rule doesn't exist in basketball, you can ask anyone in Europe, if in NBA exists I don't know, but here NO. But I repeat, I agree with you if the beneficts don't go to the infringer like this example you say maybe you can act like you say but ...
Travelling are travelling in any part of the court. In this case the beneficts goes to the usa player (lebron in this case). Then this is fair for the other team?
OpinionatedCyborg said:No, you're simply wrong. Go to a reffing forum and educate yourself. If games were refereed strictly by the book, you'd have stoppages every time a player's shoelace was in the lane for 3 seconds. Or perhaps games regularly last 12 hours in Europe and you're correct. Which is it?
Press the red buttonNolan. said:These commentators are either very sarcastic or just plain stupid. They're annoying me with their silly comments. Anyway.
An explicit example of advantage/disadvantage in the FIBA rulebook:lherre said:but, men, in this case the infringer is the only benefict !!!! You don't see this??
You commit travelling (in any part of the court) and benefits the other team if the referer doesn't say nothing??
You are saying this?
You see any FIBA basketball? Euroleague maybe? In Europe ALL the travellings are a violation and the referers make his job.
This is how the game is reffed. Now you know.(Rule 47.3):
When deciding on a personal contact or violation, the officials shall, in each instance, have regard to and weigh the following fundamental principles:
The spirit and intent of the rules and the need to uphold the integrity of the game.
Consistency in the application of the concept of 'advantage/disadvantage', whereby the officials should not seek to interrupt the flow of the game unnecessarily in order to penalise personal contact that is incidental and which does not give the player responsible an advantage nor place his opponent at a disadvantage.
Consistency in the application of common sense to each game, bearing in mind the abilities of the players concerned and their attitude and conduct during the game.
Consistency in the maintenance of a balance between game control and game flow, having a 'feeling' for what the participants are trying to do and calling what is right for the game
chickensoup said:Press the red button
(Rule 47.3):
When deciding on a personal contact or violation, the officials shall, in each instance, have regard to and weigh the following fundamental principles:
The spirit and intent of the rules and the need to uphold the integrity of the game.
Consistency in the application of the concept of 'advantage/disadvantage', whereby the officials should not seek to interrupt the flow of the game unnecessarily in order to penalise personal contact that is incidental and which does not give the player responsible an advantage nor place his opponent at a disadvantage.
Consistency in the application of common sense to each game, bearing in mind the abilities of the players concerned and their attitude and conduct during the game.
Consistency in the maintenance of a balance between game control and game flow, having a 'feeling' for what the participants are trying to do and calling what is right for the game
Nolan. said:I'm recording it :/. Seriously though they were commenting on how the director was saying apart from Korea no one in the rest of the world can create a ceremony like China. Mainly because the participants are like computers and never ask questions etc, to which they were commenting ''I think that's brilliant'' or something like it. There were other things too but anyway i'll just watch.
Why oh why did people vote Boris johnson in as mayor, he just doesn't ...ugh.
Lol the flag got tangled.