Lonestar said:Gold, your team in Yahoo Fantasy...Bad luck on having Pittsburg D starting, with the Giants current 28 points on the bench.
Though, you've probably forgotten about that league, with a Kicker on Bye
Nightz said:Lonestar, can you play tonight?
Alrighty, but just to let you know, earliest I can play on weekdays is around 7 PST. Also 8-9 pm on Mondays is off limits because of Chuck.Lonestar said:Had just sat down to play some DR2. Maybe later, but I'd rather tomorrow or tuesday.
Did you set injuries on?FrenchMovieTheme said:advancing now!
GCQ you around? ill be on!
Wellington said:Did you set injuries on?
.FrenchMovieTheme said:btw, injuries are back on! so watch your players!
You play daw/chiefs.McNei1y said:I don't know if I have a bye or not but if I do play someone, I will try to get it in Monday night... not sure what time.
McNei1y said:I don't know if I have a bye or not but if I do play someone, I will try to get it in Monday night... not sure what time.
AkaBalla said:Birdman can you play after it advances?
Schilens had all the catches and he's slower than Bailey. Miller's not too fast either. The difference was the ability to run. Royal 94 spd, Thomas 96 spd.TheCrow said:GG. The speed advantage that you have with WRs and CBs really made the difference. My CBs just can't keep up. I really need to draft a 95+ speed CB during this years draft.
Eh. I didn't even have a great day passing. 2 INTs to boot. They were doing fine in coverage. And, like I said, the guy getting the grabs and TDs was being covered by Bailey who was faster than Schilens.TheCrow said:Besides Royal and Thomas I don't have speed. And Asomugha shut down Royal and Routt has the speed to cover anyone. All of your WRs and CBs have 90+ speed. It hard to get separation on offense and even harder to play man on defense.
And I already got my speed TE in Dickson. It's just going to take more time to strengthen the rest of my roster.
See, even the game is telling you. Bradshaw!Wellington said:GG Somnia. I head into the bye with no injuries, and no disconnects against anyone!
This game for Bradshaw:
6 carries, 111 yards.
Last game:
5 carries, 97 yards.
Golf ham.
Bailey got beat on the slant because he decided to do a spin before covering Schilens. Most of the routes were covered because I feel that in madden speed is the most important stat, at least for dbs. Losing Alphonso Smith hurt me since he would've been a much better nickle back. My current NB gets beat after a couple of yards.Rorschach said:Eh. I didn't even have a great day passing. 2 INTs to boot. They were doing fine in coverage. And, like I said, the guy getting the grabs and TDs was being covered by Bailey who was faster than Schilens.
And on defense, it was the covering of drags/slants/posts that did it. When people see that those are off the table, they panic.
...but I didn't really get anything off the nickel. It was all on Bailey and your safety covering Miller (6 of 10 receptions). The Higgins catch was that hail mary at the end of the first half that resulted in nothing. And it wasn't man coverage. There was only 1 real slot catch and that was the dhb catch. Your guys were doing ok covering and got two interceptions. :lol That tripled my INT total for the year! The problem came in stopping the run. You guys make up your mind before you look at the facts/stats and just decide that a certain aspect killed you when it didn't.TheCrow said:Bailey got beat on the slant because he decided to do a spin before covering Schilens. Most of the routes were covered because I feel that in madden speed is the most important stat, at least for dbs. Losing Alphonso Smith hurt me since he would've been a much better nickle back. My current NB gets beat after a couple of yards.
daw840 said:That works for me! I get home about 5:15pm CST.
Birdman02 said:I can play now if you're still around. If not, we might have to wait until Tuesday. Tomorrow's gonna be a loooooong day, and I have no idea when I'll be home.
I can do it tonight 9-10 EST if you are around.Kave_Man said:I think I'm (Seahawks) playing Astro (Cardinals) this week.
If so Astro when do you want to do this thang?
Also I must be really stupid...but how the hell do I add my free agents? I swear I spent half an hour last night trying to figure it out to no avail. :/
AstroLad said:I can do it tonight 9-10 EST if you are around.
My question exactly.Miguel said:WHY AIN'T WE 'VANCIN'
? They did fix them in the division. They just didn't fix them in three-way ties. -_- So, you shouldn't be seeing any problems yet.LiveWire said:Good to see EA didn't fix the playoff tiebreakers. :lol
Rorschach said:? They did fix them in the division. They just didn't fix them in three-way ties. -_- So, you shouldn't be seeing any problems yet.
The National Football League said:TO BREAK A TIE WITHIN A DIVISION
If, at the end of the regular season, two or more clubs in the same division finish with identical won-lost-tied percentages, the following steps will be taken until a champion is determined.
Two Clubs
1. Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).
2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the division.
3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games.
4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference.
LiveWire said:Nope.
1. San Francisco 49ers (FrenchMov) 5 Wins 1 Loss Division 1-0 Conference 3-1
2. St. Louis Rams (DJ Demon J) 5 Wins 1 Loss Division 2-0 Conference 4-0
#1 is a tie, so #2 should be used, and Rams should be listed in 1st. But look at Mr. Alphabet, what does he say?
SA versus ST
Well that about wraps it up folks! Move along, nothing to see here! :lol
storybook77 said:Ummm....the percentages are both 100%, I still fail to see the problem here.
LiveWire said:2-0 is better than 1-0. That's why if you look at NFL.com standings, the Redskins are listed as #1 in the NFC East, even though they, the Eagles and the Giants are all 2-2.
Yep.LiveWire said:Nope.
You're basing it on the website? Mistake #1.#1 is a tie, so #2 should be used, and Rams should be listed in 1st. But look at Mr. Alphabet, what does he say?
SA versus ST
Well that about wraps it up folks! Move along, nothing to see here! :lol
Rorschach said:You're #1 in the console standings. These are the real standings. The website standings are sorted automatically by the first column in the table (which happens to be team name). You can sort them through each individual column, but that doesn't really fix anything.
Three way ties that aren't in the division are fucked. I don't know about division 3 ways, but wildcard three ways are.LiveWire said:Ah, yea I was looking at the website. OK then. But 3-way ties are still fucked? Jeez.
Ramirez said:You can skip me in the FA stuff, don't really care.
Round 2:Rorschach said:1- Bears WR- Antonio Bryant
2- Jags CB- Shawn Springs
3- Titans LE- Jarvis Green
4- Ravens QB-Null Void
5- Vikings QB- R. Yu
6- Seahawks FS- A. Afalava
7- Texans LOLB- A. Thomas
8- Falcons K- Shane Graham
9- Chiefs DT- Jay Alford
10- Dolphins FS- Kevin Ellison
11- Bengals HB- D. Woodhead
12- Cards C- J. Hartwig
13- Redskins FB Oren Oneal
14- Panthers CB Fred Smoot
15- Pats HB Willie P
16- Lions LG Donald Thomas
17- Giants WR Troy Williamson
18- Chargers CB Walt Harris
19- Bills WR Matt Jones
20- Browns CB Macho Harris
21- Steelers RB Justin Fargas (FB BJ Askew?)
22- Cowboys CB Nick Harper
23- Buccs LT Mike Gandy
24- Packers OLB Derrick Burgess
25- Eagles S Quentin Demps
26- 49ers LG Kynan Forney
27- Saints LG Guy Whimper
28- Broncos SS Geral Alexander
29- Jets LG Maurice Williams
30- Rams LOLB Rashad Jeanty
31- Raiders HB Daniel Frisch
32- Colts QB Pat White