solidus12
Member
I wish, or they could work on an emulator that's compatible with disc based games (PS2 dvds, and PS3 blurays)With all those profits, maybe now they can afford to put ps1, ps2, and psp games on its so-called "premium" service.
I wish, or they could work on an emulator that's compatible with disc based games (PS2 dvds, and PS3 blurays)With all those profits, maybe now they can afford to put ps1, ps2, and psp games on its so-called "premium" service.
That he's got it easy while Phil has a mess to deal with?
Jim Ryan didn't really do anything things just happened.
All Phil had to do was release some games in the last 5 months of the year, and he delayed all 4 of what were expected to release in that period. Also no better X production.
Basically just gave Jim the entire 4-course meal for free.
So, Phil has the power to make Xbox do poorly and make Sony successful? At the same time? He really can do everything, can't he?
Don't play dumb, you know exactly what I was saying which was that Phil being weak aided in Sonys earnings success because they basically didn't have to compete with anything.
Any games that could have slowed or taken sales were delayed until this year.
Oh...Switch was supposed to be swept under the rug with the launch of the PS5 and XSX/S. Two years into these behemoths' launches, Switch be like:is this potato cheaper or more expensive?
that doesn't answer my question.Oh...Switch was supposed to be swept under the rug with the launch of the PS5 and XSX/S. Two years into these behemoths' launches, Switch be like:
I'm not playing dumb. I'm being sarcastic because what you're saying is ridiculous.
Your sour grapes about X-Box is transparent as is the other comments about the FTC. How about you make a post about how X-Box can do better instead of transparently trying to diminish Sony's success?
Switch is cheaper, but not by as much as many would like it to be. I will laugh hysterically if Switch can pull it off again this year. December is coming...that doesn't answer my question.
if Xbox had games this quarter it would have taken sales, sold more, and it wouldn't have been as lopsided, preventing this record. There's nothing ridiculous about it.
Phil basically gave jim ryan the whole quarter outside whatever he was able to salvage by having massive S discounts in place of low X stock.
I'm diminishing Sony's success by saying they were successful in part to Xbox not doing better? FTC? What are you talking about?
Sony broke a record, there's no diminishing, the only thing being criticized is Xbox.
People are in denial.You have no proof or real cause to believe that XBox has or would have had any relevancy to Sony's success. And, yes, by saying Sony broke a record because MS didn't release any games in the same period and "gave" Jim Ryan the whole quarter - you are attempting to downplay Sony's success.
and the potato?Switch is cheaper, but not by as much as many would like it to be. I will laugh hysterically if Switch can pull it off again this year. December is coming...
Revenue, not earnings.
Revenues are earnings because revenue isn't somehow useless or a throwaway item. Revenue can be put back to work for your business, it can buy, cover costs. It can get your business bank loans. Revenue absolutely = earnings. Operating income, which is what you're left with after deducting operating expenses, costs of goods solds, wages isn't the only thing that mattters.
There's a big difference saying gaming made $8.8B earnings in the thread title, while making $8.8B in sales and $820M in earnings.Revenue - $8.797 billion
Operating Profit - $820 million
Profit Margin - 10.7%
these numbers seem fake.But Sony fans said nobody would buy a PS5 if they put their games on PC.
How can this be?
Easy.But Sony fans said nobody would buy a PS5 if they put their games on PC.
How can this be?
Easy.
That theory where if Sony puts games on PC, then PC gamers will play them and then drop their PC for a PS5. Get ready for Steam users to drop like a rock.
The funny thing is that those declaring consoles dead whenever games get PC ports are the same people begging for said ports.But Sony fans said nobody would buy a PS5 if they put their games on PC.
How can this be?
People are in denial.
The PlayStation brand is stronger than ever, in large part due to Sony's excellent 1st party output last-gen.
We've had multiple reports stating PS5 is the most-wanted current-gen console, the thirst is real.
Now that Sony is also targeting a broader audience with HBO's TLOU and the upcoming Horizon and GOW series, the Playstation brand will only expand.
There really is very little MS can do at this point. Not even major releases will make a noteworthy difference.
Basically, Xbox is irrelevant in general.
Fantastic numbers. But then this was obvious. Playstation is strong. They're not the market leader for nothing.
Revenues are earnings because revenue isn't somehow useless or a throwaway item. Revenue can be put back to work for your business, it can buy, cover costs. It can get your business bank loans. Revenue absolutely = earnings. Operating income, which is what you're left with after deducting operating expenses, costs of goods solds, wages isn't the only thing that mattters.
With all those profits, maybe now they can afford to put ps1, ps2, and psp games on its so-called "premium" service.
How on Earth would you know this? So this wouldn't have happened if Xbox had more stock of Series X and a game? What happened to High on Life? Did CoD not do well on Series X?if Xbox had games this quarter it would have taken sales, sold more, and it wouldn't have been as lopsided, preventing this record. There's nothing ridiculous about it.
Phil basically gave jim ryan the whole quarter outside whatever he was able to salvage by having massive S discounts in place of low X stock.
I'm diminishing Sony's success by saying they were successful in part to Xbox not doing better? FTC? What are you talking about?
Sony broke a record, there's no diminishing, the only thing being criticized is Xbox.
Jim Ryan didn't really do anything things just happened.
All Phil had to do was release some games in the last 5 months of the year, and he delayed all 4 of what were expected to release in that period. Also no better X production.
Basically just gave Jim the entire 4-course meal for free.
Oh...Switch was supposed to be swept under the rug with the launch of the PS5 and XSX/S. Two years into these behemoths' launches, Switch be like:
How on Earth would you know this?
What happened to High on Life? Did CoD not do well on Series X?
Why are you doing this?Oh...Switch was supposed to be swept under the rug with the launch of the PS5 and XSX/S. Two years into these behemoths' launches, Switch be like:
No. Series S, which counts towards all Series sales was very much in stock at a reduced price which you said so yourself, they had big multiplat games such as Call of Duty WWII which sold a shit load more than last years CoD. Phil had fuck all to do with Sony's success.So you're questing that if Xbox had games in the last quarter of the most important sales and marketing period of the year, they wouldn't have improved their sales and wouldn't have possibly prevented Sony from having this record by incentivizing games on the fence or who were in patience to get an Xbox over the PS5 in Xbox's strongest markets?
I mean ok fair enough, that seems wacky to me though.
High on Life was selling boat loads of Series X's, because it wasn't a console mover to that extent and there weren't many Series X produced during that quarter.
You do realize if they had Forza, Starfield, Redfall etc, in the last 4-5 months of the year, their performance would have been radically different right?
By this logic PS5 shouldn't sell as much this quarter because Hi-Fi Rush was releasedif Xbox had games this quarter it would have taken sales, sold more, and it wouldn't have been as lopsided, preventing this record. There's nothing ridiculous about it.
Phil basically gave jim ryan the whole quarter outside whatever he was able to salvage by having massive S discounts in place of low X stock.
I'm diminishing Sony's success by saying they were successful in part to Xbox not doing better? FTC? What are you talking about?
Sony broke a record, there's no diminishing, the only thing being criticized is Xbox.
No. Series S, which counts towards all Series sales was very much in stock at a reduced price which you said so yourself,
By this logic PS5 shouldn't sell as much this quarter because Hi-Fi Rush was released
Or the PS5 is just more attractive than Xbox regardless... That can't be it, right?Which has nothing to do with the lack of Series X that weren't produced, so not getting your point.
Lack of X harmed overall sales. Lack of big games delayed until 2023 from 2022 also hurt xbox sales, and gave reason to get a PS5 instead, or to buy those games instead, since they were actually released..
Why are you comparing Hi-fi rush to Forza, Starfield, and GOW:R in the biggest selling quarter in gaming with the most exposure and marketing?
Why are you pretending you don't understand what happened?
Or the PS5 is just more attractive than Xbox regardless... That can't be it, right?
Where did I compare Hi-fi to them games? You said if Xbox would have released good games it would have prevented PlayStation from getting a record.Which has nothing to do with the lack of Series X that weren't produced, so not getting your point.
Lack of X harmed overall sales. Lack of big games delayed until 2023 from 2022 also hurt xbox sales, and gave reason to get a PS5 instead, or to buy those games instead, since they were actually released..
Why are you comparing Hi-fi rush to Forza, Starfield, and GOW:R in the biggest selling quarter in gaming with the most exposure and marketing?
Why are you pretending you don't understand what happened?