PhoenixDark
Banned
It strikes me as a moot point considering a 1.8t stimulus bill was never going to get passed
It strikes me as a moot point considering a 1.8t stimulus bill was never going to get passed
So it seems like Ohio will be the big state; whoever wins it "wins" the day. I don't see how Romney can claim victory if his wins are only in his home state, a neighbor state, and a state where he's the only candidate on the ballot.
Diablos said:Anyone thinking Romney would pick Christie as his VP?
I want the teleprompter meme to keep going so I have more excuses to post this gem from last year's White House Correspondents Dinner.
I want the teleprompter meme to keep going so I have more excuses to post this gem from last year's White House Correspondents Dinner.
This is awesome. The Biden bits are the best.
This is pretty annoying. Democrats hated it when Rush and others tried to do that stupid shit in the Democratic primaries, and now they want to try it.
This is pretty annoying. Democrats hated it when Rush and others tried to do that stupid shit in the Democratic primaries, and now they want to try it.
Question for the pros...
Has austerity ever worked during a recession when deficits were involved? I keep hearing that massive cuts will boost confidence therefore the economy will boom. When has this happened before?
Early 80s maybe? But Reagan ran up the deficit so where does theory come from.
Yeah, we should all just stop that bullshit.This is pretty annoying. Democrats hated it when Rush and others tried to do that stupid shit in the Democratic primaries, and now they want to try it.
Question for the pros...
Has austerity ever worked during a recession when deficits were involved? I keep hearing that massive cuts will boost confidence therefore the economy will boom. When has this happened before?
Early 80s maybe? But Reagan ran up the deficit so where does theory come from.
This is pretty annoying. Democrats hated it when Rush and others tried to do that stupid shit in the Democratic primaries, and now they want to try it.
I predict as much success as the "Vote Cain if you want to vote for Colbert" movement.
I just kinda skimmed it, but is it really being pushed by democrats, or is this a preemptive excuse Romney's team is giving just in case he loses?
When Reagan took office unemployment was at 7.5%
He proceeded with a tax cut and budget cuts.
That actually caused the recession to worsen with unemployment reaching 10.8%
Also, important to note, the Reagan recession was caused by government monetary policy.
By today's metric of what constitutes a budget cut for either democrats or republicans, it's very possible that that graph does in fact show "budget cuts" of that type...you know, the: "we're cutting military spending - rather than increase by 15% we'll be increasing by 10%"
He (and the Democrat Congress) expanded government spending by 19 percent in his first two years.
But then ...
He (and the Democrat Congress) expanded government spending by 19 percent in his first two years.
But then ...
The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 included steep increases in military spending, steep cuts in non-defense expenditures, and a large tax cut (legislated through ERTA 1981). Although the Reagan administration predicted that the combination of spending and tax cuts would reduce the federal deficit, the deficit exploded under Reagan.
The recession was caused by government monetary policy, namely as I said in my post the Fed actions to control inflation. That was the ORIGINAL cause of the recession not market factors. There is a difference between the causes for a recession (which begin before Reagan took office) and it worsening.
A recession can't be 'worsened' by one budget. A series of budgets over consecutive years can have a dramatic effect, but this 'X happened in January because Y happened in November" is far too simplistic to assign to something as complex as the American economy.
Romney was at Daytona last year and said he also has been to the track in New Hampshire. Does he follow the sport?
"Not as closely as some of the most ardent fans," he said. "But I have some friends who are NASCAR team owners."
Our new Michigan poll: Romney 39, Santorum 37, Paul 13, Gingrich 9
Romney up 40-29 in MI union households, more evidence bailout stance not a problem for primary
Romney's key base of support in Michigan is seniors. Up 50-34 overall with them and many already voted
2 weeks ago Santorum was up 30 with Evangelicals/Tea Party in Michigan. Now up only 7 with them
Romney goes into MI election day with a big lead. Among 16% who have already voted, he's up 62-29
Some new PPP stats on MI :
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/02/romney-takes-small-michigan-lead.html
Some new PPP stats on MI :
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/02/romney-takes-small-michigan-lead.html
The Not-Romney self destruction tour continues.
Some new PPP stats on MI :
http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/02/romney-takes-small-michigan-lead.html
I maintain that without the fat buckets of cash raining on the state, he still wouldn't win. Romney is a bubble boy.
I want the teleprompter meme to keep going so I have more excuses to post this gem from last year's White House Correspondents Dinner.
Interesting that the union voters are now actually supporting him at a much higher rate than Santorum or Gingrich.
Our final Arizona poll: Romney 43, Santorum 26, Gingrich 18, Paul 11
Romney's pretty much already won AZ. Up 48-25 on Santorum with early voters, nearly half of electorate
68% of AZ voters most concerned with economic issues, only 11% with social ones. Mitt up 48-24 w/ former
Santorum's image down in AZ, but Romney's is up too. Now at +31 (62/31) in AZ. Was just +24 week ago
51% of AZ voters watched debate. Santorum in 3rd with them at 21% to 43% for Mitt and 23% for Newt
Romney's winning Evangelicals, Tea Party, 'very conservative' in AZ...headed for a very thorough victory
Clear message in both our AZ and MI polls that social issues secondary this year to GOP voters. Could be hurting Santorum
Last PPP poll on AZ
It seems like Republicans are falling into line with Romney after he dumps a ton of money in their states, so I suppose it will depend on how much money he spends ahead of "super" Tuesday.Romney will win both states. I wonder how that will impact some of the Super Tuesday states generally thought to lean to Santorum (or Gingrich). Do republicans decide to fall in line now?