The Librarian
Banned
NBC is calling Minnesota for Santorum.
Is that a winner-take-all for its 55 delegates?
Is that a winner-take-all for its 55 delegates?
Missouri moved up along with everyone else, but when they tried to move back behind the March firewall to avoid being penalized it got blocked by the State Senate. So they left the primary on the ballot and just made it non-binding and moved the delegate awarding to a caucus.What the hell is the point of this, then?
It's up to the conventions.NBC is calling Minnesota for Santorum.
Is that a winner-take-all for its 55 delegates?
LINK
Republicans run on a platform of wasting taxpayers money which is why they are holding this primary.
Romney beating back Santorum in Colorado.
11% of the vote in Colorado totals less than 1,000 votes?
11% of the vote in Colorado totals less than 1,000 votes?
AHIt's 11% of the precincts, not the vote. They precincts very in sizes.
Romney beating back Santorum in Colorado.
It's whatever the State Convention decides.wonder is MO is winner take all delegates
It's whatever the State Convention decides.
Technically every single race tonight is non-binding. The straw poll results will not determine the delegate counts.
The word coming from the Mitt campaign is that Missouri doesnt really matter because there are no delegates there and they didnt commit time or money. The problem, though, is that Santorum doesnt really have any time or money to commit there either. And if youre the frontrunner, the presumed nominee, you get clobbered in a swing state just because you didnt aggressively campaign there? Thats a very, very low standard. Santorum is clearly leaning hard on evangelicals. And really this isnt about Santorum. Its about Romney. Absent crushing spending and a week or so to focus on a single state, Romney seems to have a really rough time. Thats bad, especially in the Midwest where a Republican candidate has to run strong. And especially when hes faltering in national polls versus President Obama.
On Huffington Post it looks like Santorum wins all 3.
It's like Iowa. The caucuses decide delegates to the local/state conventions which then picks the national delegates. And that decision has nothing to do with the straw poll results. You could have a precinct where it's Santorum 50%, Romney 30%, Paul 15%, Newt 5% in the poll and Newt could still wind up with all the delegates.I knew about MO's binding caucus in March, but when does CO and MN decide forealsies?
On Huffington Post it looks like Santorum wins all 3.
On Huffington Post it looks like Santorum wins all 3.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/02/that_doesnt_make_sense.php?ref=fpblg
That Doesnt Make Sense
Umm how did Romney lose Colorado so badly?
I feel like the "big money election" meme is being somewhat quashed by the successes of Santorum.
No one would have thought to campaign against Santorum anyway, but my point is more that success is not necessarily predicated on spending lots of money.Didn't Romney and his Super-Pac not spend a cent in Missouri and Minnesota?
No one would have thought to campaign against Santorum anyway, but my point is more that success is not necessarily predicated on spending lots of money.
No one would have thought to campaign against Santorum anyway, but my point is more that success is not necessarily predicated on spending lots of money.
CO is coming in fast now, with Santorum ahead (for now).
Santorum was pretty thoroughly outspent in Iowa, though. I'm not saying money doesn't matter, just that it's not the exclusive determinant.But it can be highly correlated with the money. Romney basically bought Florida. I guarantee if he unloaded his money on those states he would be at least closer.
I get what your saying, but Newt has been slammed (and harmed) twice now because of Mitt's money. Santorum has yet to be the brunt of it. Lets see if Santorum holds up against what Romney is about to unleash on him
Santorum was pretty thoroughly outspent in Iowa, though. I'm not saying money doesn't matter, just that it's not the exclusive determinant.
Santorum was pretty thoroughly outspent in Iowa, though. I'm not saying money doesn't matter, just that it's not the exclusive determinant.
Colorado Having 'Technical Issues' @ ethanklapper : John King: Colorado GOP is having "technical issues.
bahhahahaha . Iowa part deux?
I just found this thread. Why is GAF splitting up all our PoliGaf threads? It is confusing! :/