In an interview with TIME, the former Pennsylvania senator who finished second to Romney in 2012 says he's sure he would have defeated Obama had he won the GOP nomination. He also previews some of the themes he might emphasize should he run for president in 2016
...
Its not only Barack Obama who has been advocating a more cautious foreign policy. Its also Republicans.
Agreed. Youve seen me out there taking on the Paul faction. I did during the campaign. I took on Ron Paul at debate after debate on Iran, on Pakistan. I see the Rand Paul wing of the Republican Party for what it is: allied with Barack Obamas foreign policy. I think thats a very serious threat to our own security.
...
Do you think you would have beaten Obama?
Without a doubt.
Why?
Because I would have been able to attract the voters in the states that mattered. Romney would probably do better than me in New Jersey and California and New York. But Id do better in Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Virginiain the states that were going to decide the election. Look at how we did in Ohio in the primary. We got outspent by huge amounts. I didnt run a single ad in the Cleveland market, and we still almost beat him in Ohio.
...
You know what, they can get to the top of the pack and fall too. One of the things I know is that when I got to the top of the pack I didnt fall. I ran out of money, and I ran out of time. And the forces were against me. Its tough running against City Hall.
The amazing thing, here we are looking at 2016, and many of the national polls dont even put my name on the list. They review the candidates, and Im not included on the list of people who they look at, which I sort of get a kick out of. Its sort of been my strength over the course of my political career that Im always underestimated. Always. The Democrats did that for a long time and I won four straight races. And now its happening on the Republican side.