Go White!Go Green!
Uh, something political... Go to the voting booth!
Go White!Go Green!
It was more a comment on how y'all in this thread should feel ashamed for being enthusiastic about such a hawkish candidate. Grudgingly acceptant, yes; enthusiastic, no.
Also, 73-22-5 compared to 51-14-35 implies that when you take out Don't Knows, Clinton is on 77-23 and Sanders is on 78-22, so... there's effectively no difference (this matches with the CBS/NYT poll, see my post in the Trump supernova thread). The difference isn't in favourability (most Democrats see other Democrats favourably for obvious reasons), but in enthusiasm; a much higher proportion of Sanders' supporters are enthusiastic about him than Clinton's supporters are about her.
Yeah if you just disregard the actual numbers and make up new ones he's doing great!It was more a comment on how y'all in this thread should feel ashamed for being enthusiastic about such a hawkish candidate. Grudgingly acceptant, yes; enthusiastic, no.
Also, 73-22-5 compared to 51-14-35 implies that when you take out Don't Knows, Clinton is on 77-23 and Sanders is on 78-22, so... there's effectively no difference (this matches with the CBS/NYT poll, see my post in the Trump supernova thread). The difference isn't in favourability (most Democrats see other Democrats favourably for obvious reasons), but in enthusiasm; a much higher proportion of Sanders' supporters are enthusiastic about him than Clinton's supporters are about her.
I wouldn't even say that. I know my friend sourshoes likes him, but rubio has even less personality than Mitt Romeny (who was a somewhat likeable figure actually). I have heard rubio speak a lot, and he is the most boring fucking person that ever lived.Rubio is an empty establishment figure. Even if he gets the nomination, there's not going to be the enthusiasm he needs to have any chance of becoming president. He's a good talker, but it's obvious the ideas aren't his own.
Oh so now we're going to start being figurative, lolThat's great. I was hoping he'd make the DNC one more time.
2016 is going to be interesting. You'll have Obama, loved by the base, Clinton, loved by pretty much everyone, and Carter, whose image has been rehabilitated greatly since his presidency and he's pretty well-regarded as a diplomat and peacemaker. Compared to the RNC where they'll just jizz over Reagan's figurative corpse for four nights while the two living GOP presidents are shoved in the closet.
Yeah if you just disregard the actual numbers and make up new ones he's doing great!
NEW YORK (Reuters) - A rapid increase in the number of U.S. women turning to intra-uterine devices to prevent pregnancy has prompted escalating attacks on the birth control method from groups that oppose abortion.
The next battle will be at the U.S. Supreme Court, which has agreed to consider a new religious challenge to contraceptives coverage under President Barack Obama's healthcare law. Although the case deals broadly with whether religiously affiliated groups should be exempt from providing birth control coverage to their employees, some parties in the case have focused specifically on IUDs.
IUDs work primarily by preventing sperm from reaching an egg. But they have come under fire from anti-abortion groups because, in rare instances, they can prevent a fertilized egg from implanting in the uterus. Those who believe that life begins at conception consider blocking implantation to be terminating a pregnancy rather than preventing pregnancy.
"IUDs are a life-ending device," said Mailee Smith, staff counsel for the Americans United for Life, which filed an amicus brief in support of the challenge before the high court. "The focus of these cases is that requiring any life-ending drug is in violation of the Religious Freedom Act."
Haha. I'm noticing a similarity between your PoliGAF posts and your Mafia playstyle.Bru, taking out "don't know" is not "making up numbers". The HillShills in this thread sweatin' mad, gonna Hillsplain me some more I suspect.
I mean...that's what they areIt's REALLY HARD not to see "anti-abortion" groups as "anti-sex" groups:
http://news.yahoo.com/u-iud-attracts-opposition-anti-abortion-groups-060750159.html?nf=1
Haha. I'm noticing a similarity between your PoliGAF posts and your Mafia playstyle.
I am. They stuck me in the normal game for some reason: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1145600maybe ive been lying about my alignment all along
D:
also why are you not in this season. i wanted revenge. ;_;
I am. They stuck me in the normal game for some reason: http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1145600
You have no idea how relieved I was when you died. Really proud of that game. Definitely the GOAT victory.
lol incredibly unlikelyI bet Trump is terrified, Jeb!'s PACs have already proved a formidable force.
But the commercials are so boring and obnoxious.I bet Trump is terrified, Jeb!'s PACs have already proved a formidable force.
Yeah, they gave Jeb a 10 point shift in his polls.I bet Trump is terrified, Jeb!'s PACs have already proved a formidable force.
Did I just get astrolad'd by a crustacean?Crab's sarcasm is too high grade for you folks.
I'm sure this story will endear Jeb with the base.
How many republican posters are there in this thread?
There's Black Republican and Metaphoreus. So that makes two?
Black republican is actually republican?There's Black Republican and Metaphoreus. So that makes two?
SourShoes makes three. benji is libertarian, which is close enough to four.
SourShoes makes three. benji is libertarian, which is close enough to four.
Benji is an anarcho-capitalist. I don't think you could put him into either party without stretching like a motherfucker.
Just curious. Do they post often? I enjoy seeing opposing points of views.
YesJust curious. Do they post often? I enjoy seeing opposing points of views.
A Communist?! On NeoGAF?! *reports thread to the HUAC*Joey Fox posted in the previous thread. He's red I believe.
I always assumed Black Republican was a euphemism for extremely rare unpredictable phenomenon. Like a black swan event.There's Black Republican and Metaphoreus. So that makes two?
Nothing like a little mafia style "protection" to bring them fearfully back into the fold "That's a nice congressional majority you have there, would be a shame if anything... happened to it."I'm sure this story will endear Jeb with the base.
would you describe him as... hurriCain like?Me, although I don't post very much anymore--despite my strong beliefs, I'm not really that keen on arguing, especially when I'd be 1 person arguing against 20
"Extremely unpredictable phenomenon" is, indeed, an accurate description of Herman Cain.
would you describe him as... hurriCain like?
would you describe him as... hurriCain like?
Benji is an anarcho-capitalist. I don't think you could put him into either party without stretching like a motherfucker.
Benji is an anarcho-capitalist despite (or perhaps due to) deep historical knowledge, which he readily shares.True, Benji would be better at home in a philosophy thread.
Trump will be live tweetingDoes everyone have their conservative and gop candidates twitters open for the carnival of twat responses after Obama speaks?