Kid Rock lookalikes are one of Trump's growing demographics, surprisingly.
What is this swamp he is talking about?
Why isn't the MSM talking about this?
I thought the swamp is DC and rooting out corruption, but is it about ISIS? I'm very confused.
Is he still harping about rigged election?
This shit isn't cool, he's talking about illegal immigrants voting, and I would not be at all surprised if his extreme and bigoted base were to attack some minority thinking that they are here illegally and have no right to vote.
This legit pisses me off, these ignorant morons think this is rigged and he keeps fueling that fire. And they keep making threats against Hillary and people that will be going to vote for her, I swear I best not see anyone at my polling place trying to intimidate voters for this orange asshole because I will absolutely snap on them.
I thought the swamp is DC and rooting out corruption, but is it about ISIS? I'm very confused.
As Campfireweekend could tell you, I don't know anything about economics, but quantitative easing is just the government purchase of bank held assets, right? The government could totally buy all of the student loan debt in the country and just never collect. It would economically just function as a transfer payment. All of the arguments I've heard against total loan forgiveness are that it's a poorly reasoned stimulus and goes to the wrong people (richer people end up at richer schools; why not just give the money to the poor and homeless who are more likely to spend it) and it's also a lot of money. But it's not impossible and I don't know think there's anything to suggest there would be economic collapse.I think Oliver is wrong on this point. She can't destroy the economy by forgiving student debt through quantitative easing.
The reason being is that you can't use quantitative easing to eliminate student debt.
What was obvious is she doesn't know what quantitative easing actually is. I guess if she attempted it, she could hurt the economy. It could actually help, though the Fed is pretty much at its limits with it. If she did it a huge amount she hurt the economy.
All the while, student debt would go no where.
The general idea is the Jill Stein is a wackjob moron and anything she'd do is so stupid that the sum of all the parts would be a nation's economy being destroyed and that is largely correct.
Hahaha, oh man...
"Forget the press, read the internet." - Donald Trump
Good lord.
Wait, I thought the swamp was DC.
Trump's top S.C. adviser: "We have zero comment on any of the bimbo eruptions contrived by the Clinton campaign"
Katy Tur
@KatyTurNBC
This entire Trump speech so far is polls and bashing the media.
Vic Berger: Melania Speaks Out About the Trump Tapes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96esIUaFqmU
You missed the best part where he said that many reporters won't be around much longer. Yeah, that's not ominous or anything.
- You're actually injecting 1.3 trillion into the economy.- Taking 1.3 trillion dollars out of the economy, a huge blow to loan-giving companies and strongly disincentivizes them from giving out future loans
- Printing 1.3 trillion dollars immediately crashes the dollar
Umm..
@MckayCoppins:
As Campfireweekend could tell you, I don't know anything about economics, but quantitative easing is just the government purchase of bank held assets, right? The government could totally buy all of the student loan debt in the country and just never collect. It would economically just function as a transfer payment. All of the arguments I've heard against total loan forgiveness are that it's a poorly reasoned stimulus and goes to the wrong people (richer people end up at richer schools; why not just give the money to the poor and homeless who are more likely to spend it) and it's also a lot of money. But it's not impossible and I don't know think there's anything to suggest there would be economic collapse.
Umm..
@MckayCoppins:
"Bimbo eruptions" is seriously old school.
The true believer surrogates are the worst. It's one thing to put up with this garbage for another few weeks because you want to get hired in the next two years, it's another entirely to actually fool yourself into believing the poison coming right from your own mouth.
well the Green Party platform had homeopathic and alternative medicine in it up until this year so i'm not sure if they're any better than their candidate!Stein and Johnson are basically the Trump's of the Green/Libertarian party. They utterly fail to represent their parties/platforms with any degree of intellectual rigor and substance. They're just trying to ride the coattails of political frustration through name recognition.
Compare them to a real third party candidate like Nader with actual credentials and accomplishments and it's hard to see them as anything but a joke.
It gave me intense 90s flashbacks."Bimbo eruptions" is seriously old school.
"Bimbo eruptions" is seriously old school.
I'm convinced he would try and shut down news media in some form or fashion, if he got in. He's hinted at it a few times before. He wants a propaganda wing and nothing more.
For us Mexicans and Hispanics in U.S., that sounds delicious:
Stein's signature plan (eliminating student debt via quantitative easing) would destroy the economy, full stop.
She is a shyster and does not deserve your vote.
Yea you know Jeffrey Lord is just taking the piss. He's still vile as well, but you know he's doing it because he's getting paid.
well the Green Party platform had homeopathic and alternative medicine in it up until this year so i'm not sure if they're any better than their candidate!
He wants a constitutional amendment to limit terms on congress. That's...not crazy, amazingly.
He just hasn't gotten to the part where it only applies to Democrats.
He just hasn't gotten to the part where it only applies to Democrats.
The value of the dollar would only go down if you released that trillion into the economy at once. If you scheduled the payments over time to coincide exactly with the required payments of each individual loan then there would probably be a much smaller inflationary effect.Le'ts think on a basic level. When you print over $1 trillion, the value of the dollar goes down. What do we get in return? Debt relief for young people. However, those young people weren't going to pay that debt off for many years. So you have this immediate devauling of the dollar, and it doesn't produce liquidity and very little spending power for anyone. It'd be a disaster.
A president Trump would go on a "corruption" witch hunt and try to destroy any of his political rivals. He wants Paul Ryan to have a jail cell right next to Clinton.
Been out of the loop somewhat since the last debate....does the Orange troll have any path to victory or have we reached a point where if the voters turn out she curbstomps him?
From what I've read trying to catch up, it seems like a foregone conclusion...I'm not willing to go that far though...
Yes it is.
Its a horrible idea that would take accountability even more away from the people.
It is one of the worst reform ideas ever. It hasn't worked in the states, won't work federally.
I don't even know why people think it will.
The value of the dollar would only go down if you released that trillion into the economy at once. If you scheduled the payments over time to coincide exactly with the required payments of each individual loan then there would probably be a much smaller inflationary effect.
I agree that those people weren't going to pay that debt off for many years. So the increase in each individual's spending would actually be very small. That's another small inflationary effect. (Such a claim demands quantifcation but I can't give that. Sorry.) Also, they're unlikely to replace that debt with new debt because the college loans were government backed, but most other debt is not as easy to obtain.
Anyway I do agree it's bad fiscal policy. You devalue the dollar for no liquidity and little spending power. Not good! But "disaster" seems to be a non-sequitur. That's all I'm saying
The value of the dollar would only go down if you released that trillion into the economy at once. If you scheduled the payments over time to coincide exactly with the required payments of each individual loan then there would probably be a much smaller inflationary effect.
I agree that those people weren't going to pay that debt off for many years. So the increase in each individual's spending would actually be very small. That's another small inflationary effect. (Such a claim demands quantifcation but I can't give that. Sorry.) Also, they're unlikely to replace that debt with new debt because the college loans were government backed, but most other debt is not as easy to obtain.
Anyway I do agree it's bad fiscal policy. You devalue the dollar for no liquidity and little spending power. Not good! But "disaster" seems to be a non-sequitur. That's all I'm saying
Jesse Ferguson said:Trump staff on CNN w/ @jaketapper right now arguing POTUS wasn't legitimately elected b/c of voter fraud in North Carolina.
They're really going this route? Really?