thatsbait.gif
thatsthejoke.jpeg
Also, congrats Adam! We know how much it means to you.
thatsbait.gif
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
He'd flip over the podium and denounce crooked Hillary as a Pharisee.Jesus would vote for Clinton in this election and you know it.
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
which episode was this?
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
All I'm saying is not I'm writing him off till the election is over and done
Why, so you make another thread on OT where you're just asking questions?
Nah
The far right is legitimately scary, the far left is just annoying. Let the far left have their hemp burgers in piece, the far right legitimately wants to turn minorities into burger.
The entire race would need to be turned on it's head for Trump to win at this point and, frankly, I can't think of anything that would do that.
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
he ruined one country, now he is about to ruin anotherUgh Nigel Farage on CNN. Fuck off.
I might not have to. Chris Wallace will "ask questions" at the debate, then you can get mad at him.
Hypothetical: Would you put money on it? At what odds? PredictIt has him at 20% and I think that's way too high.
Nigel Farage is on CNN
I might not have to. Chris Wallace will "ask questions" at the debate, then you can get mad at him.
I'm not sure there were many national polls run since he entered the race where he didn't lead. Were they any at all, ever?Was there evidence that he would win 20 days before the end of the primary?
25%? Wow.I still give him a 25% shot, his core base will never change their mind on him, so he will always have that
hey ruined one country, now he is about to ruin another
The one that took a honeymoon to the Soviet Union?I think Mika just wet herself in both senses of the phrase.
Guys, look back at 1 year ago and think. Trending 400 EV, taking the Senate and a chance (slim) at the House. Unbelievable.
Think what could have been with a GOOD candidate!
I still give him a 25% shot, his core base will never change their mind on him, so he will always have that
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
The one that took a honeymoon to the Soviet Union?
It seems there were some very early in the race, but it Trump went on a glide path starting in mid-March.I'm not sure there were many national polls run since he entered the race where he didn't lead. Were they any at all, ever?
chris wallace will "ask questions" at the debate, clinton will give 1-minute answers that basically neutralize them for people who don't have raging hateboners for her, and trump will melt down again by debate's end
we've been through this twice and i was right both goddamn times
Oh yeah that reminds me. Anyone who is claiming that the far left isn't a problem, go look at the UK where part of the reason for the successful rise of the far right is the stupid purity politics of the far left there.
Got me there lolHey 50%+ of Republicans like Putin now
There was never evidence, anecdotal or otherwise, saying Trump was going to be the nominee when he announced his candidacy
I still give him a 25% shot, his core base will never change their mind on him, so he will always have that
Maybe the real October surprise is that none of the controversy effected Trump
I gotta say, I think the low point in terms of the pit in my stomach was when Trump did the press conference before debate 2. It can't get worse than that.
I'll put this stark warning next to your other one about the Chelsea bombing being the work of an active terrorist cell in NYC.
Could someone explain why the House margins in 2008 were larger (D-53 R-43) than the President race(D-52 R-45.7) while in 2012 the House margins where tighter than the president race. (House: D-48 R-47) (President D-51 R-47)
Could someone explain why the House margins in 2008 were larger (D-53 R-43) than the President race(D-52 R-45.7) while in 2012 the House margins where tighter than the president race. (House: D-48 R-47) (President D-51 R-47)
Redistricting doesn't change overall vote.Redistricting in 2011.
These types of comments make me wonder why people are liberals?
I understand frustration and anger at policies and actions but if it just becomes "well fuck them" then what is the defining philosophy? help everyone or just the people who helped me?