7% is really becoming common.
Obama is far more useful as a campaigner and fixture for the Dems that a Justice
Obama is far more useful as a campaigner and fixture for the Dems that a Justice
Bipartisan support is not something that should be factored into the decision.I'd be happy with Sri as the Scalia replacement. He's more centrist than other choices but has bipartisan support and would shift the court heavily to the left compared to Scalia. The fact that he'd be the first Asian-American on the court and is 45 is just a bonus.
Obama for SCOTUS. Do you think Hill could get away with that? Would he want the job? He wants to fight against gerrymandering.
She could do it, but Obama does not want to be on the court, nor does the party want/need him there. He's going to be doing a lot of great things, most of which won't be political in nature. And I'd imagine he'll be speaking at DNCs in prime time every four years.Obama for SCOTUS. Do you think Hill could get away with that? Would he want the job? He wants to fight against gerrymandering.
Whoa, Hillary's dropped 1.5% in the polls-only in the last 4 days. Shit.
Yup. I believe the race is and will finish around 7-8%
If you average out the national polls from the past 8ish days and leave out the +15 outlier and the daily trackers... (4-way):
+4 ABC
+4 YouGov
+6 Morning Consult
+6 Survey Monkey
+6 Fox
+7 Qpac
+8 GWU
+9 CBS
+9 Selzer
+10 SurveyUSA
+11 NBC/WSJ
+12 Monmouth
... You get: 7.67
Obama is actually better used in charitable efforts and GOTV campaigns in the future, where he'll be unrestricted by any kind of public office.
You don't actually need him in the supreme court- there are any number of decent legal minds that could rule on cases perfectly well.
There's only one (ok ok...two) Obamas though.
Obama for SCOTUS. Do you think Hill could get away with that? Would he want the job? He wants to fight against gerrymandering.
GOTV game absolutely should have a noticeable impact! I just prefer to play it safe and conservative with my expectations for this kind of thing. I would welcome a double-digit final margin with open arms!This assumes that pollster estimates of democratic turnout this year have been accurate. Everything we've seen so far says this isn't the case. we can't simply "average in" the +4 results, since they generally assume higher turnout from a whiter and older electorate that we know is not going to appear. They're invalid assumptions.
Pollsters also have no way to figure out the impact of the robust ground game on the clinton end, and complete absence of any kind of GOTV effort by the trump campaign.
it's that last bit of business that had the poll average for Obama off from the final result by 3%. I would be VERY surprised if hillary's final margin was below 10%.
Where do you buy your rubber sheets guys?Whoa, Hillary's dropped 1.5% in the polls-only in the last 4 days. Shit.
Whoa, Hillary's dropped 1.5% in the polls-only in the last 4 days. Shit.
This assumes that pollster estimates of democratic turnout this year have been accurate. Everything we've seen so far says this isn't the case. we can't simply "average in" the +4 results, since they generally assume higher turnout from a whiter and older electorate that we know is not going to appear. They're invalid assumptions.
Pollsters also have no way to figure out the impact of the robust ground game on the clinton end, and complete absence of any kind of GOTV effort by the trump campaign.
it's that last bit of business that had the poll average for Obama off from the final result by 3%- but the gap between clinton and trump is WAY larger than the one that existed between Romney and Obama.. I would be VERY surprised if hillary's final margin was below 10%.
Pollsters also have no way to figure out the impact of the robust ground game on the clinton end, and complete absence of any kind of GOTV effort by the trump campaign.
it's that last bit of business that had the poll average for Obama off from the final result by 3%- but the gap between clinton and trump is WAY larger than the one that existed between Romney and Obama.. I would be VERY surprised if hillary's final margin was below 10%.
Donald J. Trump ‏@realDonaldTrump 27m27 minutes ago
The results are in on the final debate and it is almost unanimous, I WON! Thank you, these are very exciting times.
Whoa, Hillary's dropped 1.5% in the polls-only in the last 4 days. Shit.
You want rigged? THIS is fucking rigged.
...and I though early voting lines in Georgia were bad.
Some districts in NC are just awful.
Lets also not forget that Trump underperformed his polls in the primaries. A different beast for sure but a potential sign of what we're going to see in November.
Trump says the county is being run by babies and losers. He projecting his flaws onto other people again.
I have been hearing conflicting reports then hahaHe didn't really underperform his polls in the primaries. The polls were in line with the results for the most part.
Who is in charge of this account needs to be rewarded
Her people have been tossing bombs all throught the general election. Compare and contrast to Trump's team, which struggles to bring normalcy to their candidate's derangement.
also whenever there is a -H tweet it always comes across as sincere and genuine. For all the 'grandma needs help with her email' jokes she has tweeting down pretty well.
To be fair, I don't think she writes the -H tweets either lol
This is what has me optimistic about the House. What if by election day Hillary increases another 3 points in the polls and then her GOTV operation outperforms and the electorate is less white than predicted. It's Speaker Pelosi time.
Hypothesis #1: The polls are underestimating Clinton because they don’t factor in her superior ground game.
Most reports (and we’ll have an article with some extensive data on this soon) suggest that Clinton is far better organized than Trump, with more field offices, for example, and a better get-out-the-vote (GOTV) operation. Isn’t that reason to think the polls are underestimating Clinton by a bit?
natesilver: That’s one of the better arguments, yeah.
harry (Harry Enten, senior political writer): Well, the question you have to ask yourself is whether or not the field game is being picked up by the polls. In a wonderful, perfect universe, it would be. In reality, I have my doubts. That’s why I’m not entirely sold on polls showing a large gap (in Trump’s favor) between registered voter results and likely voter results.
natesilver: The empirical literature on the ground game is messy because there are so many conflating variables. But what would worry me if I were Trump is that the race isn’t that close if everyone turns out — and I have the worse turnout operation.
micah: How would the polls pick up on a better ground game?
harry: A ground game is supposed to get people to vote. So, if Clinton’s campaign is getting more people engaged, then polls that are aimed at identifying likely voters should pick up on that. More of those voters should make it through the likely voter screen.
natesilver: Well, maybe they’ll make it through the likely voter screen, but a lot of likely voter screens rely on past voting history, and may or may not have adequate provisions in place to capture new voters.
harry: Right.
natesilver: Also, a lot of likely voter screens do something that’s probably dumb, which is to set a hard cut-off for voting propensity instead of doing it probabilistically. Clinton has a “long tail” of semi-likely voters that she could potentially draw from.
I dont get the point of pretending you won debate.
SHIT, Misty Snow is never going to win with those coattails! Dreams of a veto-proof Senate are dead.Whoa, Hillary's dropped 1.5% in the polls-only in the last 4 days. Shit.
-----------------
I know betting on a polling miss is a fool's game.
But.
I do think that the margin will be on the upper range of the MOE, not the low end. Hillary has a competent GOTV operation, Trump does not. 10 point victory?
also, the "shy" voter argument would seem to favor Hillary far more than Trump, tbh, especially when you consider gender, modern polarization (making it harder to defect publicly), etc. Extreme candidates underperform polls, not overperform... Angle/Reid comes to mind, among others.
I dont get the point of pretending you won debate.
Michelle's gotten to Donald.
He's this close to blasting her...
What did he do / say?
No it does not puzzle me lolOut of everything he's done, this is the thing that puzzles you?
HahahahaPoligaf right now.
lolPoligaf right now.
Or Trump himself. How often did he outperform his polling in the primary?