Veritigo_X
Member
The next Dem candidate needs to be someone with HRC'S minority appeal, Bernie's economic appeal, and a fuck ton of charisma. No other way around it.
So we've got no one to run in 2020.
The next Dem candidate needs to be someone with HRC'S minority appeal, Bernie's economic appeal, and a fuck ton of charisma. No other way around it.
Trump beats Hillary
Obama beats Romney
Obama beats McCain
W. beat Kerry
W. beats Gore
Clinton beats Dole
Clinton beats H.W.
What does every single one of these have in common? The winner was 100%, without a doubt, more charismatic than their opponent. Every single election. Are we sure policies even matter anymore?
Trump beats Hillary
Obama beats Romney
Obama beats McCain
W. beat Kerry
W. beats Gore
Clinton beats Dole
Clinton beats H.W.
What does every single one of these have in common? The winner was 100%, without a doubt, more charismatic than their opponent. Every single election. Are we sure policies even matter anymore?
Hillary's supposed to be doing a press conference nowish? Anyone got a link to it?
They don't.
At this point H.W. is an anomaly. He's the only one who didn't run on charisma in the modern era to win. And that's because his competition was even more boring.
And honestly, maybe charisma has always mattered more than we'd like to admit. Charismatic presidents greatly outnumber bland one. People like Kennedy, FDR and TR were very charismatic and appealing to the common man (even if all three were ultra rich members of the elite and from wealthy, established families).
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-hampshire-senate-ayotte-hassan
Hassan could pull it out.
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
10:30
Yeah it got pushed to 10:30. Never edited my post, sorry.
But the totals were down compared to 2012?
This is true, but it's only true if you take into account 5 million 2012 Obama voters NOT showing up for Hillary.
That, PoliGAF, is not Comey. That's Hillary. She was the perfect candidate for a guy like Trump, and all our months of arrogance and surety in the numbers looks mighty silly when she just fucking failed to do what presidential candidates need to do.
I'm pretty convinced they don't.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-hampshire-senate-ayotte-hassan
Hassan could pull it out.
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
You know the answer already. Direct Democracy was a mistake.If policies really really don't matter, like if literally nothing about a political platform matters other than salesmanship, where does that leave democracy?
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
Oh there is. He will blame Obama for the problems he creates and the media will not challenge any of it.
If policies really really don't matter, like if literally nothing about a political platform matters other than salesmanship, where does that leave democracy?
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-hampshire-senate-ayotte-hassan
Hassan could pull it out.
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
And this is the kind of elitist attitude that costs democrats elections.
Enough.
She did destroy Bernie. She trounced him by over 4 million votes.
For that matter, Trump's primary performance trounced him too.
So show me on paper how Bernie would have been better.
Poor white working class? No. Bernie is all entitlements, he's compete welfare state, and according to some in here white folk don't like they because they're too principled or some shit. You're tangling yourself here.
Bernie and Trump would have been fighting over the same coalition of voters, only Trump still comes with the name recognition and overt racism that would have put him over the edge. Oh, then there's the fact that Bernie is a gross disgusting pervert who writes rape fantasies (this is how you KNOW the GOP would sell it), and bam. Now you have the problems with women reproduced.
If there is a lesson the Dems should take, it's not running a dope like Bernie in hopes of winning some white rural. It's the complete opposite:
Do not waste a single fucking second playing for the Republican base. Republicans ALWAYS come home. Always.
Democrats thought a Trump candidacy would expand the map for them. They thought wrong.
Riling up your base. Keeping them engaging. Tossing them red meat. Needs to be priority number 1 for whoever runs next.
Because that's what Republicans do. And that's why their base always comes home.
They don't matter as much, but we of a certain standing like to pretend they do. You have to be a warm face first, otherwise people don't listen to your words and policies.Trump beats Hillary
Obama beats Romney
Obama beats McCain
W. beat Kerry
W. beats Gore
Clinton beats Dole
Clinton beats H.W.
What does every single one of these have in common? The winner was 100%, without a doubt, more charismatic than their opponent. Every single election. Are we sure policies even matter anymore?
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-hampshire-senate-ayotte-hassan
Hassan could pull it out.
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-hampshire-senate-ayotte-hassan
Hassan could pull it out.
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
This is what us 26-34yos had to go through that the 18-25s didn't. The chasm this election has been noticeable between those two groups.I was still 17 and couldn't vote this election
I feel so shook to my core. I had always planned on voting every two years, for locals, etc. But I swear to god, I can't leave it to chance anymore, I have to get involved, going door to door, everything.
Fuck this is so humiliating as a Muslim-American.
Are a referendum on the current Pres.I would also like to point out that we're already skipping 2018. MIDTERMS.
Well, NOW I do.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-hampshire-senate-ayotte-hassan
Hassan could pull it out.
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
I would also like to point out that we're already skipping 2018. MIDTERMS.
http://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/new-hampshire-senate-ayotte-hassan
Hassan could pull it out.
I think we're going to get a centrist male Democrat in 2020 who will focus on rural voters. Anti-trade, little mention of social/criminal justice, focus on jobs and infrastructure. Basically Trump without the overt racism.
I would also like to point out that we're already skipping 2018. MIDTERMS.
royalan, if you genuinely believe that, you can kiss sweet goodbye to 2020. I mean, I don't even know what to say if you think the answer to Clinton is to run... effectively more Clinton.
I would also like to point out that we're already skipping 2018. MIDTERMS.
Yup. This is how I see it. Many people think dems will go more left. Nope. They are going more to the Center on a few issues. If yall want that rural vote that we'll never get no matter what this is what dems will do. A more economically populist message. Probably very little gun talk etc.
At this point, I know he has to be white and male for sure.
I mean, I don't think anyone here is holding out hope for midterms. Dems have been horrific at voting in midterms.I would also like to point out that we're already skipping 2018. MIDTERMS.
And thinking about 2020 right now is essential. The Dems need to be a hard opposition party now with people to rally behind. We can't take any chances and start thinking about this in 2020. The only thing (besides complete destruction) that is worse than a one term Trump presidency is a two term Trump presidency.GUYS
Who gives a fuck who runs in 2020? Shit is going to be nigh-on-permanently fucked during the next 4 years anyway.
This is now a question of survival, not victory. Winning in 2020 won't count for shit.
If he's bland, it won't matter.
I would also like to point out that we're already skipping 2018. MIDTERMS.
Not comparable. Hillary was hardly as charismatic or as likable as Obama so she was never getting that 5 million but here's the thing: When you aren't as desirable, you have to get what you can and score how you can.
In a tighter race, where the difference is literally 110k votes from the Oval Office, the margins of error are a lot smaller.
So, yes, in that regard, something like Comey's letter can have the effect we saw last night. Without that letter, maybe Trump doesn't bridge the enthusiasm gap and make up that slight difference in returns.
At this point, I know he has to be white and male for sure. Someone like Bill from a red state.
Elections democrats historically snooze on.
I mean, I don't think anyone here is holding out hope for midterms. Dems have been horrific at voting in midterms.
And thinking about 2020 right now is essential. The Dems need to be a hard opposition party now with people to rally behind. We can't take any chances and start thinking about this in 2020. The only thing (besides complete destruction) that is worse than a one term Trump presidency is a two term Trump presidency.
Yeah, because it's "elitist" to be opposed to racism.
Like it or not, that's the problem here. Millions--or at least hundreds of thousands--of people are predisposed to believe in empty promises because they inherently are willing to believe that black and brown people are the cause of the problems.
A) I don't feel like charismatic is a word I'd use to describe Trump but considering I consider him to be offensive on a base level, I don't know if I'd be the right person to ask in that regard?
B) Maybe a stronger push for union rights may be the avenue for the Democrats to pursue? But a lot of that is up to the states and if the Dems don't control that State then what can be done?