We'd have been better off had Hillary won in 08
Also blue dog dems fucked us hard. The stimulus was too small. The aca wasn't enough.
The dems tried to play nice in 09 and it destroyed the long term viability of the progressive movement.
Worst part is they all lost anyway.
They should have gone hard left when they had the chance. It was a once in a generation chance and we went for incremental change when the time called for radical change. I see that now.
We'd have been better off had Hillary won in 08
Also blue dog dems fucked us hard. The stimulus was too small. The aca wasn't enough.
The dems tried to play nice in 09 and it destroyed the long term viability of the progressive movement.
Worst part is they all lost anyway.
They should have gone hard left when they had the chance. It was a once in a generation chance and we went for incremental change when the time called for radical change. I see that now.
If young people keep not showing up and minorities are less than enthused to vote after this defeat, they most certainly can.
The alt-right isn't going away even if some of these older folks die off. The alt-right is filled with loud young idiots.
What was the last presidential election that didn't leave one-half of the country completely devastated?
yes, maybe switch the candidates around...Hillary 08-12 and Obama for '16..
the first bit and the second bit don't go together. Clinton has always been the candidate of incrementalism.
This is a comment that should make me laugh but I can't.
Surprised people thought I wasn't white. I have mentioned it before.
Depending on how bad a trump presidency is people may be enthused to vote against him.
I'm ready to put the immediate blame squarely on Hillary's campaign staff.
I still can't believe they completely fucked up on WI PA MI.
yes, maybe switch the candidates around...Hillary 08-12 and Obama for '16..
Would have worked out a lot better.
If he actually creates a better economic situation for the rural/exurban whites who came out of the woodwork for him, sure. I'd be very surprised if that actually happens.
What was the last presidential election that didn't leave one-half of the country completely devastated?
I don't think that's entirely fair, the ground game for PA was well done and we still lost. Completely missing the rust belt though... yeah that was a fuck up.I'm ready to put the immediate blame squarely on Hillary's campaign staff.
I still can't believe they completely fucked up on WI PA MI.
Yup. This is the future. Get rid of the systems that were specifically set up to promote minorities and women in the Democratic Party. Let it go right back to its white male roots. You want progressive values? This is how you get them. Talk about class, not about race, not about gender, not about GLBT. Those people will have to fend for themselves.
It's sad how easy this stuff is to see coming.
I always thought you were black.Yes. But I'd be classified as a globalist.
My girlfriend is just white. She was devastated.
We're not all bad!
I multiplied the number of adults in the US by 1000, and then multiplied that by 12. Got this: 2.9096498e+12. I'm not too good with numbers, but if I'm not mistaken that is almost 3 trillion dollars per year for universal income
good luck with that
I'm kind of confused about how you got to there from what Crab said.
Trump's trade policies and health care policies will devastate Michigan.
They should have gone hard left when they had the chance. It was a once in a generation chance and we went for incremental change when the time called for radical change. I see that now.
Those are the things Crab is talking about. "No more backstage selections." That means no superdelegates, right? Which exist, at least in part, to make sure people of color and women have representation in the Democratic Party. It means open primaries, right? Which hand over a lot more power to occasional Democrats and third-party voters at the cost of the dedicated Democrats. And what do those people who don't turn out much for Democrats or don't vote for Democrats want? I have a guess.
Crab has no excuse, frankly, because he already knows what happens when you kick over the party structure and turn it over to the public. You end up with Jeremy Corbyn and a Labour Party which is simultaneously sacrificing the last shreds of its intersectionality in order to accept left-wing anti-Semites and racists and also utterly incapable of contesting a general election.
Yup. This is the future. Get rid of the systems that were specifically set up to promote minorities and women in the Democratic Party. Let it go right back to its white male roots.
I get all this, but right now the party needs to worry about getting to a position of power.
This is stage 4. Acceptance. I reached it sometime this afternoon as well.I don't even have it in me to be angry. I'm just sad and disappointed.
This is stage 4. Acceptance. I reached it sometime this afternoon as well.
So. While we all play the blame game, why are we avoiding like mad to blame the people who actually voted in someone completely unfit.
Instead we're all feeling sorry for the people who just delivered this nightmare.
And making up fantasies based largely on the things we like as policy as a panacea to bring them in the fold.
I think it's sheer delusion to think that running around campaigning on legalising weed or making single payer the centre piece of the campaign is going to get these rural whites on board. If I'm being less defeatist it maybe maybe gets stupid under 30s to actually vote.
This is stage 4. Acceptance. I reached it sometime this afternoon as well.
So basically the democrat in 2020 should run on the New Deal 2.0.
Those are the things Crab is talking about. "No more backstage selections." That means no superdelegates, right? Which exist, at least in part, to make sure people of color and women have representation in the Democratic Party. It means open primaries, right? Which hand over a lot more power to occasional Democrats and third-party voters at the cost of the dedicated Democrats. And what do those people who don't turn out much for Democrats or don't vote for Democrats want? I have a guess.
Crab has no excuse, frankly, because he already knows what happens when you kick over the party structure and turn it over to the public. You end up with Jeremy Corbyn and a Labour Party which is simultaneously sacrificing the last shreds of its intersectionality in order to accept left-wing anti-Semites and racists and also utterly incapable of contesting a general election.
So basically the democrat in 2020 should run on the New Deal 2.0.
invoke the legacy of FDR. (interment camps aside). The president who guided the country out of the great depression and wwii that created the foundations of the country being number 1.
Indeed. When you got the chance you shove absolutely everything you can down everyone's throats, because that shit ain't gon fucking last. It never does.
And now you should kinda complete the logic and realize that the democrats avoided all the pitfalls Labour didn't and ended up just as screwed.
I mean ... do you really feel like you have a lot in common with our demographic. I feel like my three white friends are the only dudes in the country in my demo that can relate to me.
I think it's sheer delusion to think that running around campaigning on legalising weed or making single payer the centre piece of the campaign is going to get these rural whites on board. If I'm being less defeatist it maybe maybe gets stupid under 30s to actually vote.
invoke the legacy of FDR. (interment camps aside). The president who guided the country out of the great depression and wwii that created the foundations of the country being number 1.
how about tulsi gabbard? she'd be a great contrast to a 74 year old trump, doesn't have establishment taint, is centre left, and if she has even an ounce of charisma could engergise minority voters more than hillary did. I guess swing state politics wouldn't come in to play but donald trump is from new york tbf.
yas queen faction in here didn't like her, was that due to genuine misgivings with her policy beliefs or salt because she endorsed bernie?
I do recall some iffy foreign policy stuff but they may seem like the better option in 4 years who knows.
I agree it'll probably be some firebrand white dude.
So. While we all play the blame game, why are we avoiding like mad to blame the people who actually voted in someone completely unfit.
Instead we're all feeling sorry for the people who just delivered this nightmare.
And making up fantasies based largely on the things we like as policy as a panacea to bring them in the fold.
I think it's sheer delusion to think that running around campaigning on legalising weed or making single payer the centre piece of the campaign is going to get these rural whites on board. If I'm being less defeatist it maybe maybe gets stupid under 30s to actually vote.
Gabbard has the charisma of a potted plant
White people don't give a fuck about internment camps. Only liberal cognoscenti and historians even know what they are. Then again I don't know if people living in Ohio in 2020 know who FDR is.
That will be a weird platform if Trump gets the trillion+ dollars of infrastructure spending he is promising.
Democrats will have both New Hampshire senate seats for the first time since 1978.
(It's a bad day, let me have this)
And is vaguely Islamophobic if I remember right.
Sums it up.