Well, like Trump's message to Clinton asking her why these things were still broken despite all these years to fix them, Flint's water is still bad right? The pipes are still fucked, right? Flint got their airtime, they got their lip service and then what?
So yeah, a Republican administration did it to them but a Democratic federal government knows about it and isn't exactly speeding to the rescue. So all politicians get the blame there. If the Federal government deployed the Army Corps of Engineers and shit and switched the water back and started replacing pipes the day after they found out maybe more in Flint would feel differently but instead they got bottled water and assurances that this will be taken care of. Someday.
Now, that's not how law works in this country, I get it, but there it is. There's the frustration. Think about it, if you had a populist strongman in the office who forced his way in to fix that mess, how much do you think people'd be fighting that? Do you think Flint would be up in arms with State's Rights and shit if the government just shat on Flint and Michigan's jurisdiction and fixed that mistake? Honestly, probably not.
And again, I get that those jurisdictions and laws and the process that must be followed protects people from strongmen aiming to do bad things as well. But really all people see when they're knee deep in lead poisoning is one side that did it and another that's just as happy to casually let it continue until they can conveniently get it taken care of on their terms.
I would like to think that my GOTV idea could also educate people about governing and government, as a side-line. The ignorance (whether through laziness, lack of education, or just people too busy to read-up) is astounding. And that's obvious from the way that Trump was able to get the WWC vote, whilst being obviously unable to do anything for the WWC.
We know he talked shit, but people needed to be walked through it, and no-one is/was willing to do that.
Am I hoping for too much? Maybe. But I'll tell you something - my interest in gaming has died recently, and I've been thinking about how I don't do much to contribute to society. So I've got the motivation.
I see this in other threads but, why is it there seem to be a consensus everywhere that should those people actually vote between one of the two, then the vote would surely go to Clinton and not Trump?
The same with 3rd party voters. Many seemingly blame them for the loss that Hillary has suffered but, if they actually voted between one of the two main people or if there's no 3rd party choices at all, what makes you guys so sure that they would actually go to Hillary and not Trump?
Because a vote for Trump is seen as being based in
1) Racism (Hispanics/Wall)
2) Sexism (both verbal and physical assault)
3) Selfishness (I'm a white male/female - I got mine, fuck you)
4) Ignorance (He'll get jobs back bigly, even though he buys cheap Chinese steel and doesn't pay his contractors)
Third-party voters couldn't swallow voting for Trump, but didn't want to vote for Hillary (for whatever reason). So, they went for either an anti-vaxxer or dumb-ass who stuck his tongue out on TV. Oh, except for the 11,000 people who wrote in Harambe (assuming that story is true). Fucking ignorant dipshits.
(Side-note, I reckon I've sworn more over the past 2 days than I had over the previous month. Also, long-time-poster/first-time-writer of the word "dipshit")