• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT1| From Russia with Love

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tonight on the Factor! Bill O'Reilly compares the massive protests of the Trump administration to the fascist movements of the 20's and 30's, (for real) and suggests there's something "nefarious" going on with them, that they are being "whipped up" by some sinister, shadowy force, though the most specific details of his suspicions that he provides are "the internet". Charles Krauthammer tries to inject some sanity, while Bill harrumphs and shakes his head dismissively on the splitscreen! Don't miss it!
 

Vestal

Junior Member

A view of the reaction inside the WH when this happened.


vCZVpN2.gif
 
Tonight on the Factor! Bill O'Reilly compares the massive protests of the Trump administration to the fascist movements of the 20's and 30's, (for real) and suggests there's something "nefarious" going on with them, that they are being "whipped up" by some sinister, shadowy force, though the most specific details of his suspicions that he provides are "the internet". Charles Krauthammer tries to inject some sanity, while Bill harrumphs and shakes his head dismissively on the splitscreen! Don't miss it!

When my parents were watching whatever you call the 6:00 EST program on fox, I noticed that Charles Krauthammer was, while conservative, he was still talking......sane?

Is something wrong with me? Am I crazy or is Krauthammer not as bad as most fox people?
 
Panetta: Trump 'Forgot That He Was President' In Off-The-Rails Speech At CIA

He described the CIA Memorial Wall that Trump spoke in front of, which commemorates employees killed in the line of duty, as "hallowed ground" and compared it to Arlington Cemetery.

"I think to go off and start talking about the press, talking about how many people were at the inauguration, I just think that frankly that was not appropriate," Panetta said. "I just think that the President needs to understand that he is president of the United States now. He's not just a candidate. He doesn't have to spend time embellishing himself or what he did."
"I just got the impression when he was speaking there that somehow he forgot that he was president of the United States," Panetta said. "That was not the appropriate place to start whining about what was happening in terms of numbers at the inauguration and what have you."
 
His entire presidency is mainly going to revolve around him dealing with attacks/slights against himelf.
Maybe he'll be too distracted to actually legislate.

I've said before I'd rather have Pence running the show so I didn't feel constant anxiety over the US being attacked or something, but I'd also be worried about his competence. Obamacare would have been repealed Friday.
 

mackaveli

Member
Maybe he'll be too distracted to actually legislate.

I've said before I'd rather have Pence running the show so I didn't feel constant anxiety over the US being attacked or something, but I'd also be worried about his competence. Obamacare would have been repealed Friday.

But maybe Trump will just be distracted everyday and go off the rails but congress will still pass bills while Priebus just tells him where to sign and the media just goes to the next speech Trump gives and never discusses policy / law. Like they did during the election.
 

sphagnum

Banned
I'm pretty sure you could run as a Socialist in the Deep South and do pretty well as long as you were insanely racist.

Good old "National Socialism".

I missed this story from a couple days ago. Looks like Sanderistas are making a big push in California.

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Supporters of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) turned out en masse at ordinarily sleepy party caucuses earlier this month, electing a slate of delegates who could be poised to take over the largest Democratic Party organization outside of Washington, D.C.

As final vote totals trickled in, Sanders backers claimed to have elected more than 650 delegates out of 1,120 available seats chosen at this month’s caucuses. Those delegates will choose the next state Democratic Party chairman, along with other party officials.

Sanders supporters say they hope to change the very nature of the Democratic Party.

“One of the issues we’re looking to do is transform the party,” said Shannon Jackson, executive director of Our Revolution, the organization that grew out of the Sanders’s presidential campaign. “This is the first step in that process.”

Our Revolution ran an on-the-ground get-out-the-vote effort to make sure supporters attended caucuses in each of the state’s 80 assembly districts. The group sent out more than 100,000 emails and delivered 40,000 text messages, Jackson told The Hill. More than 800 Sanders supporters signed up to run for delegate seats.


...


“This is to basically force the issues that we vote on onto the legislators for action. So it’s a very serious sea change,” said RoseAnn DeMoro, who heads National Nurses United and the California Nurses Association, groups that backed Sanders during his 2016 presidential primary.

The first test of the new Sanders bloc of voters will come in May, when California Democrats choose a replacement for outgoing state party Chairman John Burton. The nurses union backs Kimberly Ellis, a San Francisco-area party activist who runs Emerge California, a group that trains Democratic women to run for office.

Ellis will face Eric Bauman, who heads the Los Angeles Democratic Party and who backed former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election. Sanders’s group has not made an endorsement in the race, though Jackson said Our Revolution would consider weighing in.

California is not the only state in which Sanders backers are trying to take over Democratic parties. The group is also organizing in Florida, Iowa, Colorado and Michigan, Jackson said.

“Hopefully, within a year or two, we’ll have a majority of the states covered,” Jackson said.

...

http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/315040-sanders-backers-take-over-california-democratic-party
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Yashar
Yashar‏ @yashar

CNN's Jeffrey Lord is saying NAFTA has caused women to come into this country who don't use tampons + that's hurting the dry cleaning biz.

Jeffrey Lord, ladies and gents.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
This will surely end well.

It's sad the left is going to have to go through the same "this shit does not work" shift that the right is going through now.
Maybe they will push for a BMI or something to help combat and have the population benefit from automation. But, considering the anointed one thinks tariffs will fix it, I doubt it.

Jeffrey Lord, ladies and gents.

I need to see this.
 
Why? They want to win elections and get their guys in, I don't see the problem.

Don't want to waste competitive seats (which there are in Florida) by nominating far-left people.

Like, nominating Todd Akin took a Senate seat away from the GOP.

And Sanders wasn't very popular in Florida.

Iowa and other states like that are fine.
 
Wasn't the problem with Sanders stans before that they were too obsessed with Sanders and needed to get involved locally if they wanted to make change?
 

sc0la

Unconfirmed Member
I've joked before that trump made his decision to run at the White House correspondents dinner where Obama trolled him. Clearly one of obamas bigger mistakes in hindsight
 
Why? They want to win elections and get their guys in, I don't see the problem.

You mean the state that Bernie LOST in the primaries? That state?

Wasn't the problem with Sanders stans before that they were too obsessed with Sanders and needed to get involved locally if they wanted to make change?

Look Im REALLY fucking glad that they want to get in involved in Iowa and Michigan, because frankly their side will probably have a better time winning over the Rust belt when you look at the primaries.

But Sanders LOST Florida and one of the reasons was because Florida democrats did NOT like what he was selling.
 
Wasn't the problem with Sanders stans before that they were too obsessed with Sanders and needed to get involved locally if they wanted to make change?

My problem with them has always been purity tests and a reluctance - if not outright refusal - to compromise. There's absolutely room for them in the party, but they've got to realize that "my way or the highway" is not the path to success

It would be easy to see that they could become the left's Tea Party. And that's not a good thing.
 
So uh

Patient Freedom Act

GOP wtf are you doing

That's going nowhere, Dems won't go for it, and neither will hard right Republicans. What they are doing is figuring out that saying you will get rid of Obamacare and actually doing it are two different things
 
If Trump freezes federal hiring, what happens to the 4000 or whatever administration positions he still needs to fill.

Also, yay we're talking about Bernie Sanders and/or his supporters again. Let's talk more about him. He's really interesting. And we haven't talked enough about him. This won't be a rehash whatsoever.
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
I've joked before that trump made his decision to run at the White House correspondents dinner where Obama trolled him. Clearly one of obamas bigger mistakes in hindsight

According to seth meyers on the pod save america podcast, Trump was somewhat honored to be made fun of by the president, but less so to be made fun of by a lowlife like him.

Another interesting side note from that interview is that Obama was apparently too preoccupied to prepare for the dinner with the operation to get Osama Bin Laden, which happened 3 days after that dinner.

https://getcrookedmedia.com/here-have-a-podcast-78ee56b5a323#.h33vqeixv
 
Don't want to waste competitive seats (which there are in Florida) by nominating far-left people.

Like, nominating Todd Akin took a Senate seat away from the GOP.

And Sanders wasn't very popular in Florida.

Iowa and other states like that are fine.
The current Florida democrats seem pretty damn incompetent so I'm not sure how new blood could ruin things there. Democrats have won two statewide offices since 2004 so like, I'm not sure how they'd ruin things further.

My problem with them has always been purity tests and a reluctance - if not outright refusal - to compromise. There's absolutely room for them in the party, but they've got to realize that "my way or the highway" is not the path to success

It would be easy to see that they could become the left's Tea Party. And that's not a good thing.
While I don't agree with your premise, since there's not really much demonstrable evidence that Bernie people abandoned the party during the election, why would having a left Tea Party be a bad thing? The Tea Party has the power to do anything they want now.
 
No replacement plan is passing which is why the plan was seemingly to just defund obamacare and stall. Trump stepping into it and claiming he wanted something right after has thrown a wrench in their plans. Basically its going to come to a head at a certain point
 

Teggy

Member
If x number of states were on Obamacare could that work? Like, Massachusetts did it alone, of course, but a network of MA, CA, VT, MN, etc. And then red states could have their Wild West thing.

And btw, how long before Trump calls for nuking the filibuster so his policies can go through?
 
If x number of states were on Obamacare could that work? Like, Massachusetts did it alone, of course, but a network of MA, CA, VT, MN, etc. And then red states could have their Wild West thing.
Nothing about the ACA requires it to be national, really, so aside from a race-to-the-bottom type problem there shouldn't be anything preventing blue states from doing their own thing unless it's a money issue. In that case though, it's like, good luck convincing California to pay for New Mexico's healthcare lol

The ACA is much less successful in less population dense states. This is partly because those are usually red states whose governors don't take Medicaid, but also because the markets aren't big enough to incentivize good competition from insurers in the marketplaces.
 

Diablos

Member
Nothing about the ACA requires it to be national, really, so aside from a race-to-the-bottom type problem there shouldn't be anything preventing blue states from doing their own thing unless it's a money issue. In that case though, it's like, good luck convincing California to pay for New Mexico's healthcare lol

The ACA is much less successful in less population dense states. This is partly because those are usually red states whose governors don't take Medicaid, but also because the markets aren't big enough to incentivize good competition from insurers in the marketplaces.
It's why Medicare for all is what we need.

It's just fucking hilarious that we have to jump through so many hoops because a third of the country is so staunchly opposed to the most sensible and efficient thing to do.
 
If x number of states were on Obamacare could that work? Like, Massachusetts did it alone, of course, but a network of MA, CA, VT, MN, etc. And then red states could have their Wild West thing.

And btw, how long before Trump calls for nuking the filibuster so his policies can go through?

They also want crossing state borders to purchase insurance, so you run into the possibility of collapsing state markets when everyone runs to Obamacare states because of preexisting conditions.
 
It's why Medicare for all is what we need.

It's just fucking hilarious that we have to jump through so many hoops because a third of the country is so staunchly opposed to the most sensible and efficient thing to do.
My public policy professor (lol alliteration) said today that the reason American health care sucks is that it's done through private insurers instead of publicly.

I'm on the "save the ACA if we can, but just expand Medicare in the future if we can't" train.
 

rokkerkory

Member
So while we close up our borders and build walls, China is investing in Latin America. Great job Trump you're handing your biggest economic enemy over to China.
 

kirblar

Member
My public policy professor (lol alliteration) said today that the reason American health care sucks is that it's done through private insurers instead of publicly.

I'm on the "save the ACA if we can, but just expand Medicare in the future if we can't" train.
The Swiss do just fine with private insurers.

Your professor's opinion is awful. The reason US health care is bad is not because of how it's delivered, it's because it's attached to employment due to its origins in the wage caps of WWII.

Wages were capped, benefits were not. Health insurance started being added on as a bonus as employers fought for workers in a very tight labor market. It became an unofficial standard, and after the war, it didn't go away, and was later codified into law.

This of course, worked great if you had a job, but not so much if you didn't have one, or work for a smaller company who couldn't leverage their size for better rates. To fix the issue, you have to mandate and subsidize coverage for all. How you do that isn't important, the important thing is doing it in the first place.
 
The Swiss do just fine with private insurers.

Your professor's opinion is awful. The reason US health care is bad is not because of how it's delivered, it's because it's attached to employment due to its origins in the wage caps of WWII.

Wages were capped, benefits were not. Health insurance started being added on as a bonus as employers fought for workers in a very tight labor market. It became an unofficial standard, and after the war, it didn't go away, and was later codified into law.
Switzerland is a dense, packed country, which is literally what I just said is the conditions the ACA works well in. It's basically pointing at Massachusetts and being like "why can't every other state be this way?"

And I know how our insurance system came to be, it doesn't make it less terrible. Private insurance is way less efficient than public coverage and lacks the ability to negotiate prices with drug companies. Combine that with a government uninterested in setting prices and we have our absurdly high healthcare spending for results that are worse than Cuba's!
 
My public policy professor (lol alliteration) said today that the reason American health care sucks is that it's done through private insurers instead of publicly.

I'm on the "save the ACA if we can, but just expand Medicare in the future if we can't" train.

Then your professor is oversimplifying the issue if he doesn't even mention the fact that most countries in the world, including the US, are in desperate need of more healthcare workers.
 
Then your professor is oversimplifying the issue if he doesn't even mention the fact that most countries in the world, including the US, are in desperate need of more healthcare workers.
This doesn't change the point that private health insurance is much less efficient than public coverage?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom