• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT4| The leaks are coming from inside the white house

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's not even accurate... He wanted single payer too.

It would be like blaming Sanders if his 'free college' idea didn't get passed if he was president. Of fucking course it wouldn't, but it's not his fault. That pesky Congress, always getting in the way.
I mean, no, Obama did not run on single payer or try to pass single payer.

You can say that he'd prefer it but adjusted to political realities, but Obama's 2008 healthcare plan probably would have looked like the ACA but with a public option and no mandate.

Why? She's right.
More surprised that she just said Democrats should run on single payer.
 
It's not even accurate... He wanted single payer too.

It would be like blaming Sanders if his 'free college' idea didn't get passed if he was president. Of fucking course it wouldn't, but it's not his fault. That pesky Congress, always getting in the way.

As he got closer and closer to power, his stance on it got weaker. When he got to be president, he didn't even try.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
I don't think anyone doubts that those two fucks would cave if needed. The question is if the rest of the nos can hold. So theoretically there is less work for McConnell to do because he can lose two votes and not worry about Cruz and Paul torpedoing the bill.


Right, the real threat to the bill is from moderate Republicans, they represent moderate constituents who might prefer to keep Obamacare.
 

Ogodei

Member
Good point. 100 < 435

More that 24:435 (votes they can lose before losing in the House) is a bigger ratio than 2:100. 5.5% of the House is "marginal" (votes not needed to pass legislation), while only 2% of the Senate is, more than 2.5x the margin for error.

Edit: For fun with Cook PVI, the House is R+5.5 while the Senate is only R+2.
 

B-Dubs

No Scrubs
Macron just invited Trump to the July 14th parade. Sigh...

It's to celebrate the centennial of French-US military cooperation.

They should just invite Obama again, just to snub Trump. Could you even imagine how salty that would have made him?
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
The obvious difference is that the GOP had a much larger margin for error in the House because their majority there is significantly larger. They can't lose a single vote after Heller and Collins.

I understand. I just foresee flipping to start happening soon.
 
*Cackle* if the bill fails in the Senate but all those giddy little representatives still have their names attached to it. We tried to tell them.
 

470nm

Neo Member
https://twitter.com/TopherSpiro/status/879741767272333312
1: I got a readout from a meeting with Senator Portman this morning. Here's what we know:
2: He wants to vote YES--but he's not there yet. He feels frustrated that his issues aren't being accommodated.
3: He wants funding for opioids and a more generous Medicaid cap. No surprise there. Keep the pressure on!


We really need to step up our game on Portman.
 
https://twitter.com/TopherSpiro/status/879741767272333312
1: I got a readout from a meeting with Senator Portman this morning. Here's what we know:
2: He wants to vote YES--but he's not there yet. He feels frustrated that his issues aren't being accommodated.
3: He wants funding for opioids and a more generous Medicaid cap. No surprise there. Keep the pressure on!

We really need to step up our game on Portman.

Portman not being a yes is good but the path to getting him there is pretty clear. Use the $188B in savings for medicaid and opioid support. If thats all it takes the bill passes.
 
The funny thing about the opiod thing...senators want money for community centers, basically. But if the bill passes with that 188B used to buy votes...the centers get built, yet your constituents don't have insurance/Medicaid and thus can't even afford treatment at the center. But hey, you built something!
 

Owzers

Member
It annoys me when gopers say "we promised to do this" as the first reason why this needs to pass and not because it will be good for people.
 
On a different note, last night I noticed there were no maps of the 1911 Prop 4 map, which gave women the right to vote. It barely passed (50.73% to 49.27%). The suffragettes actually thought they lost because of the crushing defeat in San Fransisco, easily the biggest voter base and a 61.9% loss. It wasn't until the rural counties came in a few days later that they realized they barely won by 3,587 votes!

roEjHUv.png

(Yes = blue, No = red)
 

Teggy

Member
When we talk about single payer, are we talking about the US government becoming the only insurer and Aetna, BCBS, etc. just dissolve? Because that sounds a bit scary. I could see Medicaid being a competitive option available to everyone, but how does that first version happen without mass chaos?
 

PBY

Banned

Alex Rogers
Verified account
@arogDC

Sen Collins says she's going to team up with Sen Murkowksi on an amendment to restore Planned Parenthood funding in the health care bill

Uh oh.
 

Blader

Member
If you guys think Cruz and Paul will not vote yes when they literally are the last ones standing in the way of getting rid of Obamacare, you don't get it. They will vote no only if MANY others are voting no, other than that they will vote yes at the last minute after having gotten the spotlight on themselves. Neither Paul nor Cruz is afraid of backlash from their constituents for getting rid or Obamacare, so they will vote Yes.

Cruz, yes. Rand Paul is off in his own world, though, and I've read a couple things about how the White House and Senate GOP leadership already factor in that he's more or less a lost cause.


Alex Rogers
Verified account
@arogDC

Sen Collins says she's going to team up with Sen Murkowksi on an amendment to restore Planned Parenthood funding in the health care bill

Uh oh.

McConnell would lose far more votes over adding a PP amendment to the bill than he would with the bill as is.
 
On a different note, last night I noticed there were no maps of the 1911 Prop 4 map, which gave women the right to vote. It barely passed (50.73% to 49.27%). The suffragettes actually thought they lost because of the crushing defeat in San Fransisco, easily the biggest voter base and a 61.9% loss. It wasn't until the rural counties came in a few days later that they realized they barely won by 3,587 votes!



(Yes = blue, No = red)

I'm surprised that the rural counties were more progressive than the urban cities back then. But I guess that was a Cali thing.
 

Maxim726X

Member
I mean, no, Obama did not run on single payer or try to pass single payer.

You can say that he'd prefer it but adjusted to political realities, but Obama's 2008 healthcare plan probably would have looked like the ACA but with a public option and no mandate.

More surprised that she just said Democrats should run on single payer.

It's not as if he wouldn't have voted 'yes' if it passed his desk, he just approached the situation in what he believed to be a pragmatic fashion.
 
Yeah, this supposed amendment reads as a ploy by the Moderate Darlings. They know the bill won't pass, but they get to go, "Look, we would've restored funding to PP! We are bipartisan and moderate and measured and wonderful and #bothsides!" Even as Republicans lose, those two win by bolstering their cred.

If anything, they might've just given us more indication the bill won't pass.
 

Blader

Member
Would he?

Collins and Murkowski added a similar amendment to the 2015 repeal bill. Forty-seven Senate Republicans rejected it.

47 > 2

The more worrying thing is how Murkowski will react when that amendment gets killed again. Two years, Collins continued to oppose the whole bill while Murkowski decided to vote for it. Of course everyone knew that the bill was just posturing was never going to become law anyway. But now that her vote actually matters, does she stick to her guns or does she fall in line again?
 

kirblar

Member
I mean, no, Obama did not run on single payer or try to pass single payer.

You can say that he'd prefer it but adjusted to political realities, but Obama's 2008 healthcare plan probably would have looked like the ACA but with a public option and no mandate.

More surprised that she just said Democrats should run on single payer.
It would have a mandate. He lied his ass off about that in the primaries.
 
Killing it via a PP amendment is probably the best out the Senate R's have, politically. Gives a lot of people a principled cover to make a stand on, and distract a little bit from the overall shittiness.
 
Killing it via a PP amendment is probably the best out the Senate R's have, politically. Gives a lot of people a principled cover to make a stand on, and distract a little bit from the overall shittiness.

The amendment will never reach the bill, it'll get shot down instantly. You'll probably be able to hear the senate laugh as she proposes it from the White House.

This is Collins and Murkowksi saving their asses, so when it fails, they can go back and say "well, WE tried to get something working, and nobody listened to us"
 
The amendment will never reach the bill, it'll get shot down instantly. You'll probably be able to hear the senate laugh as she proposes it from the White House.

This is Collins and Murkowksi saving their asses, so when it fails, they can go back and say "well, WE tried to get something working, and nobody listened to us"

The bill may wind up passing but the idea that this is all kabuki theater has been pretty well discredited in the last couple of days.
 
I guess we have to acknowledge that the Moderate Darlings had to be at least somewhat clever to get that title.

Tangentially, speaking of Moderate Darlings, I expected someone to trudge up to Maine and ask Olympia Snowe how she voted in the election. I guess no one cares about a former Moderate Darling.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom