• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT4| The leaks are coming from inside the white house

Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Deleted member 231381

Unconfirmed Member
George W. Bush was a household bogeyman for Democrats for years after he left office

Was he, though? Politics moves so quickly. I don't remember much reference to Bush after, I guess, the 2010 mid-terms, I think because the Tea Party sort of shattered the clear line of continuity. For all his many, many faults, Bush was not of the same ideological lineage as even a few years later and I think the Democrats recognised that and looked for different targets - like Palin, who was getting (justly) villified for at least up until 2013-14, at least from my anecdotal perception. It wouldn't have made sense to go after Bush when even Republicans at the time disassociated with Bush (for the wrong reasons, but there you go).

It makes sense for the GOP to go after Clinton, since the Democrats still seem ideologically in an identical position to where they were in 2016 and have no major new faces, so she's still one of the most visible targets and symbols of the Democratic movement (maybe second to Pelosi now). They'll probably stop when(/if) that changes and the party either disassociates from her or there's someone more prominent to have a go at.
 

aeolist

Banned
"We don't know how to fix thing but NEITHER DO THEY!" -The party currently in control of the United states.
bumperstickers_201706_dems2018.png


the opposition
 

Gallbaro

Banned
I'm not sure our current energy grid is capable of cooling millions of people in increasingly hotter climates without incurring any excessive additional costs or being overloaded with the strain of higher demand.

That is a long term problem and a cost impact that will likely fall on the company anyway (federal taxes).

Short term the Red states ARE very attractive due to lower cost of living (pay employees less, but more when normalized for cost of living) and much lower taxes.

Play your small violins but I write this as a business owner in NYC. Hell I have been looking at moving to Pittsburgh. I literally paid 46% (not marginal, but effective) income tax last year. NYC housing Cost of Living then quickly eat up most of my income.

Effective tax rate Would have been 38% in Pittsburgh and cost of living would have been significantly less.

Besides its not like anyone ever looked at any government service New York State or New York City provides and thinks what a great deal we are getting for our collective taxes and fees.
 
Bush is technically a better human being than Trump, but he caused a lot more damage and misery than most of the US presidents. Trump has quite a steep hill to climb.

Thank God Trump is lazy and stupid, though I'm sure this will bite us in the ass in some other form or fashion.
 

aeolist

Banned
GOP account was tweeting at a lot of Democrats, not just Hillary, asking where their plans were.

I guess they kind of assumed Democrats were like GOP in having no actual plans.
the democratic plan is still obamacare, which is a proven electoral loser for them. if the party uniformly and consistently advocated for single payer it would be much harder for the gop to do this shit.
 

tuxfool

Banned
the democratic plan is still obamacare, which is a proven electoral loser for them. if the party uniformly and consistently advocated for single payer it would be much harder for the gop to do this shit.

As if the GOP can't then advocate that everyone's taxes will go up. If there is anything people don't like is taxes.

There is no magic message here that has no downsides. Given that people whine incessantly on how bad Democrats are at messaging, they can't just throw out a "whatever" Single Payer message.
 

aeolist

Banned
As if the GOP can't then advocate that everyone's taxes will go up. If there is anything people don't like is taxes.

There is no magic message here that has no downsides. Given that people whine incessantly on how bad Democrats are at messaging, they can't just throw out a "whatever" Single Payer message.
the gop will message that anyway. literally anything the left puts up will be called job killing socialism, and their base will always buy it.

stop caring about what they say and advocate for things your base wants.
 

tuxfool

Banned
the gop will message that anyway. literally anything the left puts up will be called job killing socialism, and their base will always buy it.

stop caring about what they say and advocate for things your base wants.

Sorry but if there is anything Americans of all stripes are complete dumbasses about is their taxes. You can scare most people with tax questions. It doesn't help that they are right, taxes would be needed to pay for that, even if single payer is worth the cost. If you want policies to last a long time without getting people to demonize them, you have to get buy-in from more people than just the base.
 

Plinko

Wildcard berths that can't beat teams without a winning record should have homefield advantage
Hillary had no policies and only ran on Anti-Trump.

To be fair, a media analysis of all of her advertisements showed exactly that.

bumperstickers_201706_dems2018.png


the opposition

Those DCCC stickers are just mindblowingly stupid. Can we PLEASE hire some top marketing people to get on this? I cannot believe how bad the national democratic party seems when it comes to creating a unifying message.
 

chadskin

Member
Sorry but if there is anything Americans of all stripes are complete dumbasses about is their taxes. You can scare most people with tax questions. It doesn't help that they are right, taxes would be needed to pay for that, even if single payer is worth the cost.

Simple. Mexico will pay for single payer.
 

aeolist

Banned
Sorry but if there is anything Americans of all stripes are complete dumbasses about is their taxes. You can scare most people with tax questions. It doesn't help that they are right, taxes would be needed to pay for that, even if single payer is worth the cost.
if you believe that then why aren't you a nihilist? because it would mean the democrats have to move right forever, which provably doesn't work, and the gop will just get worse until everything explodes either figuratively or literally.
 
Sorry but if there is anything Americans of all stripes are complete dumbasses about is their taxes. You can scare most people with tax questions. It doesn't help that they are right, taxes would be needed to pay for that, even if single payer is worth the cost.
This has been the GOP's message for decades so I'm not inclined to give a fuck

You realize that accepting that taxes will never ever go up means we're stuck in this status quo or worse hell forever. Raising taxes on rich people is popular as hell. Run on that. Tell people what these greedy fucks are going to pay for.
 
Sorry but if there is anything Americans of all stripes are complete dumbasses about is their taxes. You can scare most people with tax questions. It doesn't help that they are right, taxes would be needed to pay for that, even if single payer is worth the cost.

While I don't share your pessimism exactly, I agree that people don't like taxes. It's why I like a public option; take whatever you were going to tax people for healthcare and split it into 12 monthly payments that they buy if they want (while requiring insurance with a mandate). I'd guess you'd see over 85% enrollment without technically raising middle class taxes. People love the illusion of choice.
 

Suikoguy

I whinny my fervor lowly, for his length is not as great as those of the Hylian war stallions
Kinda shocked it took this long for Hillary supporters to get likened to Amirox

I guess it only took one Bernie thread

Apparently it's not a banable offense either.
It seems we over-corrected after that rouge admin was banning too many people.
 

tuxfool

Banned
if you believe that then why aren't you a nihilist? because it would mean the democrats have to move right forever, which provably doesn't work, and the gop will just get worse until everything explodes either figuratively or literally.

You have to craft the right message. Unlike you, I don't think *Single Payer* is a magic phrase that makes everyone come chomping for that, especially when weight against aforementioned downsides. Thus the message has to be crafted very carefully to make it more palatable.

Seemingly given that so many attack the Democrats for poor messaging of good policies then clearly they're bound to fail in this endeavour. Maybe not just jumping in and expecting magic words to do their jobs for them, they should take care with how they message things.

While I don't share your pessimism exactly, I agree that people don't like taxes. It's why I like a public option; take whatever you were going to tax people for healthcare and split it into 12 monthly payments that they buy if they want (while requiring insurance with a mandate). I'd guess you'd see over 85% enrollment without technically raising middle class taxes. People love the illusion of choice.

As I noted, I'm not exactly pessimistic, but I do think you have to be careful when proposing a solution, any solution. Single payer is not exempted, so the angles should be considered. You can't just say the words and expect a policy (or even an outline) to magically form itself.

This has been the GOP's message for decades so I'm not inclined to give a fuck

You realize that accepting that taxes will never ever go up means we're stuck in this status quo or worse hell forever. Raising taxes on rich people is popular as hell. Run on that. Tell people what these greedy fucks are going to pay for.
You don't. A lot of voters do. I agree it is stupid, but I think a lot of people *are* stupid.
 

aeolist

Banned
You have to craft the right message. Unlike you, I don't think *Single Payer* is a magic phrase that makes everyone come chomping for that, especially when weight against aforementioned downsides. Thus the message has to be crafted very carefully to make it more palatable.

Seemingly given that so many attack the Democrats for poor messaging of good policies then clearly they're bound to fail in this endeavour. Maybe not just jumping in and expecting magic words to do their jobs for them, they should take care with how they message things.

personally i think the democrats have poor messaging of bad policies (let's means-test everything and make a shiny website that's impossible to use if you want healthcare), and moving to good and popular policies (which are coincidentally far and away easier to message, like "everyone gets medicare") would do much better for them.
 

kirblar

Member
personally i think the democrats have poor messaging of bad policies (let's means-test everything and make a shiny website that's impossible to use if you want healthcare), and moving to good and popular policies (which are coincidentally far and away easier to message, like "everyone gets medicare") would do much better for them.
"Everyone gets medicare" is easily turned into "They're going to take away your healthcare and give you inferior government plans".
 

aeolist

Banned
"Everyone gets medicare" is easily turned into "They're going to take away your healthcare and give you inferior government plans".

people like medicare, which is why it's survived for so long in the last few decades of deficit hawks. up until this year it's been a political third rail that absolutely no one would seriously consider touching.

edit. and again you people are worried about republican messaging. stop. focus on winning the people who don't vote because they believe that democrats won't really do anything for them, and get them to the polls by promising them good things.
 
Those DCCC stickers are just mindblowingly stupid. Can we PLEASE hire some top marketing people to get on this? I cannot believe how bad the national democratic party seems when it comes to creating a unifying message.
It's actually legitimately disgusting how bad they are.

You wouldn't even need top marketing people either. I think Literally any random idiot you could pull out of a phone book would be able to read the room better than these guys.
 

PBY

Banned
"Everyone gets medicare" is easily turned into "They're going to take away your healthcare and give you inferior government plans".

You realize they'll shit on everything though, no? Its not like Obamacare wasn't transformed into death panels.

Dems need to not compromise and go for what they fucking believe in to be the best method of healthcare.
 

tuxfool

Banned
edit. and again you people are worried about republican messaging. stop. focus on winning the people who don't vote because they believe that democrats won't really do anything for them, and get them to the polls by promising them good things.

Those people who don't vote are precisely in that position because they don't necessarily have good political judgement and are susceptible to nonsense propaganda.

I'd say their base approach to politics is very much like Trump's. Repeat the last thing a person told them. Thus your message has to be robust enough to stick and survive whatever propaganda is thrown their way. This includes being messaged the right way, it isn't enough to expect people to recognize the inherent virtue of the policy.
 
I think people also need to accept that Obama and the Democrats probably also felt that working within the private insurance industry, in the context of 2009 was the better option over single payer.

Always jumping to "Democrats caved again" isn't super productive. Getting rid of the public option was caving. Not doing single payer wasn't caving. Obama didn't run on that and he won a huge mandate with ACA as a part of his platform.
 
You realize they'll shit on everything though, no? Its not like Obamacare wasn't transformed into death panels.

Dems need to not compromise and go for what they fucking believe in to be the best method of healthcare.

Eh. The pendulum obviously still swings quite strongly in this country. Why would the tens of millions who are okay with their employer's plan want Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan in control of their healthcare?
 
people like medicare, which is why it's survived for so long in the last few decades of deficit hawks. up until this year it's been a political third rail that absolutely no one would seriously consider touching.

edit. and again you people are worried about republican messaging. stop. focus on winning the people who don't vote because they believe that democrats won't really do anything for them, and get them to the polls by promising them good things.

When does "medicare for all" not become a good message? If you get the youth vote that never votes but push the independents to the right, what good is this message? Middle class America doesn't want to give up their employer paid plan. They definitely don't want to pay more in taxes to have those plans replaced by a medicare system. Any serious healthcare proposals on the left better deal with this or they're all just as DOA as these GOP plans.
 

aeolist

Banned
Eh. The pendulum obviously still swings quite strongly in this country. Why would the tens of millions who are okay with their employer's plan want Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan in control of their healthcare?
because popular universal programs are much harder to destroy than shit like the ACA, and because i don't trust aetna more than ryan/mcconnell
 

PBY

Banned
When does "medicare for all" not become a good message? If you get the youth vote that never votes but push the independents to the right, what good is this message? Middle class America doesn't want to give up their employer paid plan. They definitely don't want to pay more in taxes to have those plans replaced by a medicare system. Any serious healthcare proposals on the left better deal with this or they're all just as DOA as these GOP plans.

This fear of "pushing independents to the right" is based on what exactly?

The same people who switched from Obama to Trump are going to stay with Trump because they're getting better healthcare?

Give me a break. I don't believe there's this significant contingent of moderate centrists - or at least haven't seen that data. Do we have numbers on this?

edit: Also, what does "Middle class America" even mean at this point? Actually asking.
 

aeolist

Banned
also from my experience most people hate their employer provided insurance because it's expensive and terrible. if you have a gold plated plan and want to keep it you're already rich enough that you probably vote republican.
 
This fear of "pushing independents to the right" is based on what exactly?

The same people who switched from Obama to Trump are going to stay with Trump because they're getting better healthcare?

Give me a break. I don't believe there's this significant contingent of moderate centrists - or at least haven't seen that data. Do we have numbers on this?

This isn't difficult. I could not afford to take on my employers portion of my healthcare while paying lifted taxes. I'm not wealthy. I'm squarely in the middle class column.

Bernie's plan was shat on from just about every angle from both the left and the right because of what the middle class perceived their burden would be.

also from my experience most people hate their employer provided insurance because it's expensive and terrible. if you have a gold plated plan and want to keep it you're already rich enough that you probably vote republican.

You're not very familiar with union construction worker healthcare plans are you?
 
That is a long term problem and a cost impact that will likely fall on the company anyway (federal taxes).

Short term the Red states ARE very attractive due to lower cost of living (pay employees less, but more when normalized for cost of living) and much lower taxes.

Play your small violins but I write this as a business owner in NYC. Hell I have been looking at moving to Pittsburgh. I literally paid 46% (not marginal, but effective) income tax last year. NYC housing Cost of Living then quickly eat up most of my income.

Effective tax rate Would have been 38% in Pittsburgh and cost of living would have been significantly less.

Besides its not like anyone ever looked at any government service New York State or New York City provides and thinks what a great deal we are getting for our collective taxes and fees.

i do.
 
luckily the centrists are coming up with compelling alternative visions to single payer, like "what if we let kids buy really shitty plans so they don't have to worry about the mandate but they still can give money to insurance companies"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom