This truly is the darkest timeline
On the upside, he got there on the first day of Trump's vacation.
This truly is the darkest timeline
Pew Research Center‏Verified account @pewresearch
44% of Republicans say life is better today ”for people like them" than 50 years ago, up from 18% under Obama https://t.co/tz8HDnI2Rk
"people like me"
The talent is always wasted on the states with a low ceiling. The Montana party, while significantly more successful (can elect governors and Senators), is also pretty handicapped by its state's PVI.You know who has a good Dem party?
Kansas.
I know, I just get skittish until it's official.Evers has filed the paperwork to run. He just hasn't declared yet.
I wonder if instead of term limits, you could implement a system where incumbent politicians need to win a slightly larger margin of the vote each consecutive time they run.
There's some politicians who are beloved enough that they could garner 70% of the vote going into their sixth term, while you'd punish the partisan hacks who tread just a few points above their opponents.
3. Oklahoma
4. Oklahoma
5. Oklahoma
You know who has a good Dem party?
Kansas.
"people like me"
This truly is the darkest timeline
I hope Wisconsin doesn't suddenly remember that they like Walker like they have for his other reelections. It's been a pattern that his approval ratings are mediocre in every year except when he happens to be on the ballot.
Worst Dem parties.
1. Florida
2. Wisconsin
What states round out the 5 worst?
Flake has been the least liked Republican Senator for all of the last two years.
There's no counterfactual, I just think by observation that Flake's recent actions have been part of prepping a primary bid against Trump. I also expect Kasich to do the same kind of exploration. Not sure if anyone else will.
Sasse I think is more about career building in the mean time and I wouldn't expect him to jump at 2020 with or without Trump to challenge. Kasich is clearly about running.
The 2020 primary will be Pence vs. Kasich vs. Cruz.
Trump will get impeached in 2018 or 2019.
1. Florida
Just incompetence of the highest order
2. Ohio
Despite its purple presidential status the party aside from 06 which at this point was an exception have been drubbed repeated since 1990.
3. Michigan
Despite its most recent blue presidential tilt since 1992 until 2016 has only won 4/14 gubernatorial elections going back to George Romney in 1962.
4. Wisconsin
Walker. Enough said
5. Any random flyover state such as Kansas, Oklahoma, Missouri etc or South such as Arkansas, Mississippi etc
Realignment resulting in the utter destruction of the party and/or the state being historically Republican since inception
A McMullin candidacy would win Idaho and Utah and get like one percent of the vote in every other primary.Everyone sleeping on McMuffin, or just think he'll go independent rather than R?
The Texas Lieutenant Governor, ladies and gentlemen:
The Texas Lieutenant Governor, ladies and gentlemen:
The Texas Lieutenant Governor, ladies and gentlemen:
Uhhh, oklahoma is a disaster and its 100 percent republican controlled.
A McMullin candidacy would win Idaho and Utah and get like one percent of the vote in every other primary.
They let convicted felons in the WH?This truly is the darkest timeline
Suppose you're Jeff Flake. You have a 2018 re-election bid, but you aren't going to be seriously challenged because despite your state trending a little blue and some demographic shifts happening, you're well liked, the AZ Democratic Party doesn't fully have their shit together, and you won your previous elections by huge margins. You hedged your bet on Trump before the election by nominally supporting the Republican candidate but calling for Trump to withdraw after the tape. You are being primaried from the right for 2018, but it's not serious.
You're 54 years old and you have a solid congressional record with five terms in the house and a full term in the senate. You are in good health and good shape.
You release a memoir / policy manifesto in book format in 2017.
Your ideological background in terms of voting is that you're basically the Median Republican: conservative, but not off with the wing-nuts.
You come out against the Muslim ban. You were part of the bipartisan immigration working group which, by the way, should have worked. You come out swinging with a widely shared op-ed calling for a repudiation of Trumpism and a return to bipartisanship and better relations across the aisle. You are in favour of the employment non-discrimination act, despite being publicly against same-sex marriage. You then very publicly become the go-to guy for a pull-quote on how Republicans deserve to win, but have to do better at working with the rest of the country. You also notably reached out to Gabrielle Giffords when she was shot, and then you were shot at but ultimately not hit by a wacko gunman. In the wake of this, there is wide media reporting about how former president Obama wished you well and that you seem to have a good personal relationship with Democrats and solid, good guy principles. Put it this way -- you're not a Maverick, you're still clearly a Republican, no one is saying you're not conservative, but you seem to be willing to work towards what you think is a better country rather than just laugh and burn it down.
The president (and leader of your party) is extremely vulnerable and unlikely to recover or win re-election. Will he run for re-election? Maybe, but it's not a guarantee.
Are Jeff Flake's actions in the last year consistent with someone who is going to run a primary campaign against the sitting president of his own party? Yes. Are his background and personal characteristics consistent with a good platform to launch such a bid? Yes.
Apparently his approval ratings in Arizona are now 18/63
http://hotair.com/archives/2017/08/03/poll-jeff-flakes-approval-rating-arizona-now-1863/
Christ
He seems toast. His and Heller's seats are definitely winnable. If the 5 Romney Dems holds, that could guarantee at least a 50-50 split in the Senate.
I think this is an easier path than winning Texas.Don't forget McCain's seat likely being in contention.
AZ + AZ + NV = Senate majority without having to fret over winning Texas.
I think if he wins I'd call that an enormous success.If Beto can come within five points of Cruz, I'll consider his campaign an enormous success.
Yeah. Like, getting to 50 and Murkowski going D/I seems like the most likely path to a majority, but we'd likely have to flip at least 4 seats to get there. McCain retirement/Heller/Flake is only 3.I'm not super worried about the rest of the seats, but even in a wave I could see us still losing Donnelly and McCaskill's seats.
They're still at risk, for sure, but incumbents from the minority party have a pretty good record of getting reelected in midterms, even in states that are getting worse for them on paper. The fact that McCaskill can barely draw a decent challenger suggests to me the candidates there aren't liking what they're seeing in internal polling.I'm not super worried about the rest of the seats, but even in a wave I could see us still losing Donnelly and McCaskill's seats.
It's like 97%.Don't Senators in the opposing party have like a 90% reelection rate during midterms?
I think John McCain stays in that seat past 2018
She punches well above her weight for a Missouri senator (no bullshit Heitkamp/Manchin games), and the state has been lurching rightward very quickly.Why is everyone afraid of mccaskill losing?
"I caucusing with D" is pretty much a meaningless distinction. There's a reason there are no straight-up Independents in the Senate, you lose all clout.Murkowski definitely would not go D but I is a possibility.
Why is everyone afraid of mccaskill losing?
Flipping to (I) to wrench the Senate out of (R) hands is plausible, it happened before in '02.Murkowski definitely would not go D but I is a possibility.
He has Senator health care so I like his chances.I hate to be morbid but isn't it likely that his condition means he can be dead by the end if the year?
Yes. He won't be alive for the 2018 elections.I hate to be morbid but isn't it likely that his condition means he can be dead by the end of the year?
It's brain cancer, man. Kennedy had good health care too.He has Senator health care so I like his chances.