Aka money that won't be frozen.GoFundMe site sounds like a way to get "outside" money in to protect Flynn.
Aka money that won't be frozen.GoFundMe site sounds like a way to get "outside" money in to protect Flynn.
Senator Rand Paul @RandPaul
Graham/Cassidy keeps Obamacare and tells the states to run it. No thanks.
9:49 AM · Sep 18, 2017
Wednesday evening: "jk I'll vote for this, HAAAAA"Is that "no thanks I won't vote for it" or "no thanks but I'll still vote for it?"
Is that "no thanks I won't vote for it" or "no thanks but I'll still vote for it?"
Is he... Is he talking about his tower across the street? Please tell me I'm misunderstanding
Is he... Is he talking about his tower across the street? Please tell me I'm misunderstanding
Yeah he's talking about Trump Tower.
Furor over obama Wall Street speeches
Furor over obama Wall Street speeches
Furor over obama Wall Street speeches
They are both related and problematic. Idk how you can say paid speeches have zero influence. Taking hundreds of millions of dollars from wealthy financial firms over the course of a decade or so can clearly influence people.I still contend that paid speeches is a non-issue.
You want to talk money's influence in politics, the real meat is in campaign finance reform. Speeches are bad optics but have zero influence.
People are idiots.
Many of the church members gathered at Bojangles last week pointed to the presidents Christian faith, saying he brought the Bible and prayer back into the White House. Even though Trump rarely attends church himself, he frequently talked about religion on the campaign trail, promising that with him in the White House, Christians would once again feel free to openly say Merry Christmas.
President Trump has talked more about Christian values than any of the last two or three presidents that weve had, said Wayne Overton, 79, who is retired from the Postal Service and now raises cows on a farm a few miles outside of town and tours the country in a motor home. And I admire him for picking the vice president that he picked. If something happened, our country would be in good hands.
Benjy Sarlin @BenjySarlin
McCain tells @GarrettHaake he wants bipartisan bill with wks of hearings. BUT may "reluctantly" back Graham-Cassidy if AZ Gov approves
11:50 AM · Sep 18, 2017
These are incredibly, easily manipulated individuals. Like these are the people phone scams target.”President Trump has talked more about Christian values than any of the last two or three presidents that we've had,"
I can't even fathom thinking that. W Bush was a very devout Christian president. The idea that Trump is expressing or advocating Christian values is laughable.
So he wants the AZ Gov to be the fall guy. What kind of bullshit is this? Who cares what the Governor thinks? This is the entire country we are talking about.Welp
Obama and Biden spoke in a very nuanced and thoughtful way about their faith. Hillary was extremely vocal about how her faith influenced her, and Kaine eloquently described how his faith weighed on him while making policy decisions. But Trump wants to make people say Mery Christmas so theres that.
Also yeah, McCain is definitely backing this. If hes in, its a lock.
Few new polls today.
VA Gov:
William and Mary:
Northam (D): 44
Gillespie: (R): 39
Suffolk:
Northam (D): 42
Gillespie (D): 42
And Glub for Growth (the super right wing PAC) did a poll of ND Sen with the Treasurer since 2004, Kelly Schmidt. Never even seen her name floated before.
Schmidt (R): 48
Heitkamp (D) 44
ByeWelp
They are both related and problematic. Idk how you can say paid speeches have zero influence. Taking hundreds of millions of dollars from wealthy financial firms over the course of a decade or so can clearly influence people.
But I agree with the notion it's sort of hard to care right now given everything else going on. And that the current president has the most financial conflicts of interest of any person in public service history. And literally owns financial stakes in adversirial foreign governments.
But going forward we really shouldn't just dismiss financial conflicts of interests just due to partisanship. Because I'd like our candidates to actually be able to campaign against someone like Trump's multiple conflicts of interest instead of just largely not talking about it due to them being guilty of similar behaviors as well
Few new polls today.
VA Gov:
William and Mary:
Northam (D): 44
Gillespie: (R): 39
Suffolk:
Northam (D): 42
Gillespie (D): 42
And Glub for Growth (the super right wing PAC) did a poll of ND Sen with the Treasurer since 2004, Kelly Schmidt. Never even seen her name floated before.
Schmidt (R): 48
Heitkamp (D) 44
ension between the two comes as life in the White House is shadowed by the investigation. Not only do Mr. Trump, Mr. Kushner and Mr. McGahn all have lawyers, but so do other senior officials. The uncertainty has grown to the point that White House officials privately express fear that colleagues may be wearing a wire to surreptitiously record conversations for Mr. Mueller.
"fear that colleagues may be wearing a wire"
" wearing a wire"
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/us/politics/trump-lawyers-white-house-russia-mcgahn-ty-cobb.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
I'm probably late to this. but my god, does Mueller and Mueller's Team have them panicked
If Northam loses or wins by just 1-2 points, bye bye Dems 2018/2010.
They are both related and problematic. Idk how you can say paid speeches have zero influence. Taking hundreds of millions of dollars from wealthy financial firms over the course of a decade or so can clearly influence people.
But I agree with the notion it's sort of hard to care right now given everything else going on. And that the current president has the most financial conflicts of interest of any person in public service history. And literally owns financial stakes in adversirial foreign governments.
But going forward we really shouldn't just dismiss financial conflicts of interests just due to partisanship. Because I'd like our candidates to actually be able to campaign against someone like Trump's multiple conflicts of interest instead of just largely not talking about it due to them being guilty of similar behaviors as well
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/17/us/politics/trump-lawyers-white-house-russia-mcgahn-ty-cobb.html?smid=tw-nytimes&smtyp=cur
I'm probably late to this. but my god, does Mueller and Mueller's Team have them panicked
Uhh no? How would you even come to this conclusion?
If Northam loses or wins by just 1-2 points, bye bye Dems 2018/2010.
Do you really have to ask lol
I like to see how the mind works to rationalize something like that.
Just in: Dem leaders ludicrously ask CBO for comprehensive analysis of Graham-Cassidy *before* vote:
Donald Trump, super Christian.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...1076f6d6152_story.html?utm_term=.10ff70e0c230
I just can't with these people anymore.
Welp
If Northam loses or wins by just 1-2 points, bye bye Dems 2018/2010.
Ludicrously? Isn't this simply a delay tactic?
Ludicrously? Isn't this simply a delay tactic?
If Northam loses or wins by just 1-2 points, bye bye Dems 2018/2010.