• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PoliGAF 2017 |OT6| Made this thread during Harvey because the ratings would be higher

Status
Not open for further replies.
P

PantherLotus

Professional Schmuck
If your position is that what Russia did wasn't illegal and/or that significant because they didn't technically hack any election devices and/or switch votes, you've gotten every part of this wrong. And more than that, I would advise you not to be making any bets.
 
S

SatelliteOfLove

Member
nature boy said:
Wow
Click to expand...

*takes up day drinking*

Methinks this GOP civil war is in as large a part about them not putting the kibbosh on investigations as it is about failure to put out R&R and Brownbackian tax reform...

chadskin said:
The Burr/Warner press conference on the progress of the Senate Intel Committee's Russia probe is coming up shortly: https://www.c-span.org/video/?435050-1/senators-burr-warner-hold-news-conference-russia-probe&live
Click to expand...

*takes another shot of Gentleman Jack*
 
O

Ogodei

Member
VendettaRed07 said:
What the hell is this?

You realize what the job of the president actually is correct? It’s commander in chief. Of course a decorated official or someone with a lot of experience in the military is more qualified to lead the military than a random actor or reality tv star...

This isn’t about random military warship. It’s about being prepared for the job. The majority of the powers of the presidency involve foreign policy and control over our armed forces. If you want to become president you should invest in public service. The military is a branch of that. I didn’t say that was the only way, either. Just a more legitimate path than “businessman” we can’t just keep having random celebrities running for the highest office out of an ego trip. At least joint the military of being a senator/governor shows you are serious. Al Franken is qualified to run now. He wouldn’t have been over a decade ago.
Click to expand...

Really being President nowadays is just about being a good delegater and manager of people. The fictitious Trump portrayed on the Apprentice would have been a competent president because he was all about judging who was doing a good job, who was just getting dealt a bad hand, and who was actually doing a bad job and needed to be fired.

I feel like if you've ever been in a high-level administrative or managerial role of any kind you're meeting the basic qualifications for the presidency, whether that's an Admiral/General, congress, a cabinet position, or yes, private sector experience.

The main issue with the private sector vs government is the authoritarian nature of most private sector positions (Clooney had an interview recently where he talked about working with unions as a director, whereas most private sector leaders nowadays don't have powerful stakeholders who can obstruct/resist them to deal with, and their expectations hit a wall coming to government).

Having policy knowledge helps, but at the end of the day you could be as ignorant of foreign policy as Trump is and get by if you have an eye for hiring good people and know how to listen (neither of which Trump can do).
 
V

Vixdean

Member
Man, I knew this administration would be a shit show, but the intensity and speed at which it's unraveling is just shocking.

Ogodei said:
Really being President nowadays is just about being a good delegater and manager of people.

..

Having policy knowledge helps, but at the end of the day you could be as ignorant of foreign policy as Trump is and get by if you have an eye for hiring good people and know how to listen (neither of which Trump can do).
Click to expand...

I don't really agree. W was an idiot but he was right about one thing, the President is the Decider in Chief. When it comes to the really tough decisions, no cabinet member or agency head is going to make the final call. The President does have to become a domain expert in a number of areas to be able to do their job correctly. Obama was literally studying nuclear physics textbooks during the negotiations with Iran. That's why Trump is such a disaster, he's just too fucking stupid and lazy to be able to make good decisions.
 
S

Surfinn

Member
Fuck. Burr just said the committee has hit a wall with the Steele dossier. Said there have been no answers to their requests for interviews/more information.

Hopefully that means Mueller is getting everything from him instead.
 
B

BoogieWoogie

Banned
Surfinn said:
Fuck. Burr just said the committee has hit a wall with the Steele dossier. Said there have been no answers to their requests for interviews/more information.

Hopefully that means Mueller is getting everything from him instead.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't sweat it, I would also imagine this means Mueller is digging in.
 
B

BronsonLee

Member
Surfinn said:
Fuck. Burr just said the committee has hit a wall with the Steele dossier. Said there have been no answers to their requests for interviews/more information.

Hopefully that means Mueller is getting everything from him instead.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't want to talk to them either
 
P

PantherLotus

Professional Schmuck
Burr says that they have been able to confirm / vet all of the Steele dossier back to June 2016, but not anything before that date.

Aside: Steele not answering their call says more about this committee than it does about the dossier, I think.
 
B

BlastProcessing

Member
Surfinn said:
Fuck. Burr just said the committee has hit a wall with the Steele dossier. Said there have been no answers to their requests for interviews/more information.

Hopefully that means Mueller is getting everything from him instead.
Click to expand...

He also said that they had been able to reverse engineer the Dossier to a certain date, which I found quite interesting.
 
B

BoogieWoogie

Banned
PantherLotus said:
Burr says that they have been able to confirm / vet all of the Steele dossier back to June 2016, but not anything before that date.

Aside: Steele not answering their call says more about this committee than it does about the dossier, I think.
Click to expand...

EXCUSE ME.

Dude, if it's true until then, its all true. Let's be real here.
 
E

Emarv

Member
In a normal world, imagine a Senate member of the same party as the president saying they are still not ruling out collusion with a foreign adversary in an election. Crazy we're here and that this all feels baked in.
 
A

Aaron Strife

Banned
S

skullmuffins

Banned
Donald J. Trump‏ @realDonaldTrump

An interesting cartoon that is circulating.
B0kI6vMIgAEW2Gl.png



A TWEET FOR EVERYTHING
 
B

BoogieWoogie

Banned
Technically he's not lying, Russians did attempt to divide the left by pushing Stein and Sanders. He's a giant fucking asshole thinking it was anywhere near as effective as straight up backing Trump though.
 
S

Surfinn

Member
BoogieWoogie said:
Technically he's not lying, Russians did attempt to divide the left by pushing Stein and Sanders. He's a giant fucking asshole thinking it was anywhere near as effective as straight up backing Trump though.
Click to expand...

Well what he's saying is technically true but extremely misleading. As if they didn't have an agenda to heavily favor Trump over Hillary.
 
A

Aaron Strife

Banned
Larry Hogan in Maryland has good approval ratings, but polls below 50% in specific matchups against Democrats

http://2qtvrz46wjcg34jx1h1blgd2.wpe...ploads/2017/10/Mason-Dixon-MD-Poll-9-2017.pdf

I’ve often conflated Hogan and Baker in my head as popular blue state GOP governors who will probably sail to reelection, but while I haven’t seen anything that makes me think Baker is beatable, this proves Hogan is. Could easily end up being a case where the electorate likes him well enough, but is too partisan to actually keep him.
 
K

kirblar

Member
Aaron Strife said:
Larry Hogan in Maryland has good approval ratings, but polls below 50% in specific matchups against Democrats

http://2qtvrz46wjcg34jx1h1blgd2.wpe...ploads/2017/10/Mason-Dixon-MD-Poll-9-2017.pdf

I've often conflated Hogan and Baker in my head as popular blue state GOP governors who will probably sail to reelection, but while I haven't seen anything that makes me think Baker is beatable, this proves Hogan is. Could easily end up being a case where the electorate likes him well enough, but is too partisan to actually keep him.
Click to expand...
Ben Jealous
Click to expand...
Why would you do this to your kid when naming them.

Hogan having the "like but not love" problem in potential wave elections makes sense, given he got in mostly cause people loathed O'Malley.
 
B

Blader

Member
Aaron Strife said:
Larry Hogan in Maryland has good approval ratings, but polls below 50% in specific matchups against Democrats

http://2qtvrz46wjcg34jx1h1blgd2.wpe...ploads/2017/10/Mason-Dixon-MD-Poll-9-2017.pdf

I’ve often conflated Hogan and Baker in my head as popular blue state GOP governors who will probably sail to reelection, but while I haven’t seen anything that makes me think Baker is beatable, this proves Hogan is. Could easily end up being a case where the electorate likes him well enough, but is too partisan to actually keep him.
Click to expand...

Baker is going to cruise through re-election next year, which is really frustrating. But he hasn't been too terrible, and his commitment to funding PP if Congress eliminates federal funding and joining Bloomberg's climate alliance were good steps. Of course he's been plenty cowardly on other things, but what can you do.
 
S

Surfinn

Member
shadow_shogun said:
Talking heads are now going to start using Burr's statement that Russia was just try to sow chaos and were trying to affect both sides.
Click to expand...

Yup. They're gunna take this as a win and say that Russia was indiscriminately trying to divide the country with no preference for who would win.
 
A

Aaron Strife

Banned
Blader said:
Baker is going to cruise through re-election next year, which is really frustrating. But he hasn't been too terrible, and his commitment to funding PP if Congress eliminates federal funding and joining Bloomberg's climate alliance were good steps. Of course he's been plenty cowardly on other things, but what can you do.
Click to expand...
Baker is ultimately pretty harmless in the face of a Dem supermajority.

I mean, we should still recruit a decent candidate. MA is too blue to let a full blowout occur like what happened when Dems whiffed on the NV/OH gubernatorial races in 2014, but better safe than sorry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

  • Locked
Show us your gaming setup: 2023 Edition | 20th anniversary thread
2 3 4 5 6
268
58K
DGrayson replied
  • Locked
PoliGAF 2017 |OT5| The Man In the High Chair
395 396 397 398 399
20K
2M
RDreamer replied
  • Locked
PoliGAF 2017 |OT4| The leaks are coming from inside the white house
396 397 398 399 400
20K
2M
ShironRedshift replied
  • Locked
PoliGAF 2017 |OT3| 13 Treasons Why
393 394 395 396 397
20K
2M
Zaraki_Kenpachi replied
  • Locked
Poligaf 2017 |OT| It Almost Isn't Fair
9
4K
Bonen no Max'd replied
Top Bottom