Obama Tan Suit / Obama Dijon Mustard would like a word.This is officially the dumbest controversy.
Obama Tan Suit / Obama Dijon Mustard would like a word.This is officially the dumbest controversy.
Literally haven't said half the things in this post?
Can someone actually explain this Uranium thing? BC it looks bad based on this one singe Hill article I read.
?
Lol?Are you telling him you haven't said those things or are you asking? You obscure your meaning when you punctuate a sentence with a question mark even when you've not asked a question.
Lol?
Kelly isnt frustrated, hes thinking.
Businesses will always have influence! They will never not have influence. You will always be making concessions to power and influence. Trudeau has to tiptoe around Alberta's dependency on the oil industry. Obama had to work with Insurance companies.I was wrong. This is the most Kirblar post.
What do you do when those corporations have outsized influence? There's so much wrong with this post that holy shit.
Obama Tan Suit / Obama Dijon Mustard would like a word.
This I agree with (and is the consensus.) Private property.
IMO the line is a pretty bright one actually.
lol I forgot this one. good suggestion*terrorist fist jab* My man.
Its not clear what it means (or how much it really matters?), but the Ellison supporters ousted clearly think it was a power play (and gave quotes to that effect). Not sure we know more.
Can people stop acting like Kelly isn't a piece of shit now?
Me asking about this Uranium story (note I haven't even ventured into that thread bc its a mess), because there's no reporting on it and I honestly don't fucking know what the deal is isn't me trying to make hay of of this.
I specifically posted this regarding the DNC ousters, note the emphasis on the fucking bolded language.
And this Trump controversy is super dumb.
Its the classic Trump stupidity where he says something horrific and racist and then it gets picked up and both sides go back and forth, until we hit the next controversy. And we, as a society, don't move forward, progress policy, or make any real progress (outside of learning what we already know: Trump's a racist asshole), and then move on, while the people in the crossfire get hurt, in this case the military families.
Businesses will always have influence! They will never not have influence. You will always be making concessions to power and influence. Trudeau has to tiptoe around Alberta's dependency on the oil industry. Obama had to work with Insurance companies.
Complaining that they have "too much influence" is silly- you can't legislate that influence away. You also cannot legislate away the massive shifts in technology and communication that have led to mass consolidation. The consumer gains from those consolidations are real- look at people in far-out Canadian provinces being able to order things via Prime far cheaper than the prices charged in their local stores, saving them a lot of money!
edit: (why do we keep getting SARGENT instead of Sergeant?)
So we gave Kelly way too much benefit of doubt too
This does not make the controversy "dumb"! Trump getting heat for treating military families like shit is a completely earned controversy!And this Trump controversy is super dumb.
Its the classic Trump stupidity where he says something horrific and racist and then it gets picked up and both sides go back and forth, until we hit the next controversy. And we, as a society, don't move forward, progress policy, or make any real progress (outside of learning what we already know: Trump's a racist asshole), and then move on, while the people in the crossfire get hurt, in this case the military families.
The employment rate is under 5%You will look up in 50 years and have a holy shit how did we let this happen moment. You're literally making a right wing argument, btw, when you talk about the benefits to the consumer. What would actually benefit consumers are jobs that pay a living wage with benefits that won't be automated in the coming decades.
I don't see how distracting from the GOP legislative agenda is a bad thing.
Jennifer Haberkorn (@jenhab)
Schumer says all 48 Dems support Alexander-Murray. With 12 GOP cosponsors, that's 60 votes.
The Obama era my god so many stupid things.Kelly's main selling point is that he's (at least relatively) sane - I'd like to think people recognized him as more of a "least bad" option for that role than anything else.
*terrorist fist jab* My man.
The employment rate is under 5%
This is the same stupid anti-Steam Engine argument - "OH NO WE'RE PUTTING PEOPLE OUT OF WORK".
Most people are not going to sit on their asses- they will find something else to do! The problem is that this is going to require moving, and we've shackled a lot of people to their homes via our misguided homeownership push!
Lol so jelly is a shitbag?
The family needs to defend Wilson? This way they all look like shit? I cant believe this man will use his kid and stature to defend this king toilet?
What does it do?
Neuters most of Trump's attempts at sabotaging Obamacare in exchange for some semantic changes that the GOP can sell as a win. It's about the best we can possibly hope for with a government under Republican control.
My position is that the government should be providing a lot of those baseline benefits in lieu of the company, because employment is inherently unstable!Okay, but will those people earn a living wage? Will those people have any benefits or stability?
We're having these issues NOW, and not addressing them; not sure how you can feel so optimistic about the future.
You will look up in 50 years and have a holy shit how did we let this happen moment. You're literally making a right wing argument, btw, when you talk about the benefits to the consumer. What would actually benefit consumers are jobs that pay a living wage with benefits that won't be automated in the coming decades.
What are those GOP changes?
To expand on that, restores the funding that Trump cut off for the next two years while giving the GOP some token concessions with regards to waivers for certain regulations. I was worried before about what that might mean but it seems pretty minimal and more administrative than anything.Neuters most of Trump's attempts at sabotaging Obamacare in exchange for some semantic changes that the GOP can sell as a win. It's about the best we can possibly hope for with a government under Republican control.
What are those GOP changes?
States could come up with new options
It could become easier for states to get around the Affordable Care Act's insurance rules. States could not undermine protections for people with pre-existing conditions or eliminate essential health benefits, according to an analysis by health care experts Billy Wynne and Timothy Jost.
But the proposal would let states make changes to insurance requirements as long as the options have "comparable affordability" to ACA plans. That is a little more forgiving than the current requirement that plans be "as affordable as" ACA coverage.
A summary provided to GOP lawmakers suggested states could, for example, set higher co-payments for opioid prescriptions combined with lower co-payments for cholesterol-reducing drugs.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...lth-care-proposal-could-affect-you/775886001/
Would this actually do anything in practice, though?
What matters:
- Random meaningless internal DNC politics
- A fabricated story of Obama and Hillary and uranium
What doesn't matter:
- Trump insulting a soldier's family (likely out of racism) and then lying about it
- Russia influencing our democracy
Hmm...
This I agree with (and is the consensus.) Private property.
IMO the line is a pretty bright one actually.
Also this discussion about debasing Gold Star families when we live in a timeline where Trump literally dragged a Benghazi mother to a debate in an attempt to throw Clinton off her game is weird af
Does this mean Dems are fuckedKelly likes Trump, he likes his vision for USA and he is fine with what Trump wants to do.
http://www.epi.org/blog/the-racial-wealth-gap-how-african-americans-have-been-shortchanged-out-of-the-materials-to-build-wealth/Wait, what the fuck?
People don't need jobs or wages. People need wealth. Reducing the cost of producing and distributing goods means they'll have more wealth. Jobs are merely the capitalist strategy for coercing you out of your labor by refusing to provide you the wealth you need to survive. So "good jobs at good wages" is really the right-wing argument here. This is really stuff you should learn if you want to be a socialist.
Pigeon is very much right about the problem (even if we very much disagree on what the ideal end-point solution should look like!)Median and average wealth, by race
White Black
Average $678,737 $95,261
Median $134,230 $11,030
Wait, what the fuck?
People don't need jobs or wages. People need wealth. Reducing the cost of producing and distributing goods means they'll have more wealth. Jobs are merely the capitalist strategy for coercing you out of your labor by refusing to provide you the wealth you need to survive. So "good jobs at good wages" is really the right-wing argument here. This is really stuff you should learn if you want to be a socialist.
Wait, what the fuck?
People don't need jobs or wages. People need wealth. Reducing the cost of producing and distributing goods means they'll have more wealth. Jobs are merely the capitalist strategy for coercing you out of your labor by refusing to provide you the wealth you need to survive. So "good jobs at good wages" is really the right-wing argument here. This is really stuff you should learn if you want to be a socialist.
Senate votes 51-47 to reject a Democratic amendment to prevent tax legislation from raising the deficit.
Pigeon is very much right about the problem (even if we very much disagree on what the ideal end-point solution should look like!)
Someone build a time machine and shoot this back half a decade, see what comes.
https://twitter.com/sahilkapur/status/921102207793160192
Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur)
SIDEBAR: Menendez sole D defector.
:thinking: But it was a non-vote, not a no.
Also Cochran didn't vote. (Someone send a search team)
.
This seems like going for a short term win, or political grandstanding. Long term this seems like it's just a potential anchor. Please note I said potential lol.