I'll broadly agree with this, and I do think that some parts of leftists movements get too hung up on labor specifically as having some sort of virtue. Labor is a means to an end, and we live in a time of plenty where we should be able to just give a lot of people the ends
About as useful as talking about the GOP making a constiutional amendment
Agreed. Hard to say if "lol you flip flopped" matters anymore.
I don't think he's saying that. He seems to be suggesting, however, that Gold Star families should 'know their place' and be silent.In the context of Kelly's other statements, that seems to be what he is doing. Kelly seems to be arguing that the most respectful thing to do in regards to Gold Star families, is to completely ignore them.
The point of the focus on labor is that it can leverage its power to take control. The over-glorification of work as if the working class life is some sort of ideal is workerism, which Lenin railed against.
Not the same thing as the other workerism/operaismo.
Dems have become the party of fiscal responsibility as a default. The Keynesian "don't run up the credit card during good times, save it for a recession" approach is the CW now, and that's fine.Depends on if people are going to run on the deficit / debt / fiscal conservatism in 2018. Could be used to point out the hypocrisy. Though when has that mattered? Most republicans I know happily understand yet mentally dance around Clinton being the only POTUS to lower the debt. (if they only knew I'm not particularly happy he did lol). I suppose it's the only thing that really makes sense. No republican was going to vote for this hamstringing their tax breaks. So no potential anchor was ever in play.
That's the thing about control- would "labor" actually do a good job running things? Would you not just get a lot of people looking for "workerism"?The point of the focus on labor is that it can leverage its power to take control. The over-glorification of work as if the working class life is some sort of ideal is workerism, which Lenin railed against.
Not the same thing as the other workerism/operaismo.
Has Trump said anything about the CA fires?
Has Trump said anything about the CA fires?
He's made a few remarks (and finally tweeted about it yesterday) but isn't planning on visiting which is probably for the best. Definitely not very engaged with the situation, though (or at least doesn't give the impression of being engaged).
Dems have become the party of fiscal responsibility as a default. The Keynesian "don't run up the credit card during good times, save it for a recession" approach is the CW now, and that's fine.
Yes, not the network full of good looking people.CW = Conventional Wisdom???
Time to throw Pompeo out.
I await his Russian connection to pop up.
Especially when there's a far simpler answer (his boss)This is what hysteria looks like. Where everyone who does anything that is politically cynical must be doing it because they owe 50 million dollars to Russia.
I doubt it, because the pressures on this one are pretty unique.I wonder if this can become a trend on moderate fixes to ACA.
They're not the only game in town though. If that starts happening, we'll have a problem, but that problem isn't happening yet.The thing about corporate consolidation is less about political influence and more about economic. Monopolies are super efficient in theory, but in practice the lack of incentive to invest in infrastructure and cut costs/improve services does drag things down a lot. Amazon makes things cheaper now but give it a couple decades and when they're the only game in town in fact rather than just in hype and I doubt it'll be nearly as true.
The ideal loop is probably break up giant corps -> allow to reform -> break them up again when efficiency stops dropping, tbh.
Anecdotes and whatnot, but I have a lot of FB friends that are in all those Sanders pages, including the official ones, and it seems like they're focused on responding to whatever the current controversy is. I didn't see anything about the debate either and you're just now making me realize how weird that is. Even Sanders' facebook page only has a single clip of the debate and then an article where an economist debunks Cruz' claimsI thought Sanders was supposed to have a better presence on social media but I checked the tax debate hashtag yesterday on twitter to see what was going on and it was filled with a bunch of MAGA accounts talking about how Sanders is a dirty socialist and we're gonna turn into Venezuela.
I don't get it.
This one didn't get hyped up, probably because the GOP hasn't actually presented an actual tax plan yet.Anecdotes and whatnot, but I have a lot of FB friends that are in all those Sanders pages, including the official ones, and it seems like they're focused on responding to whatever the current controversy is. I didn't see anything about the debate either and you're just now making me realize how weird that is. Even Sanders' facebook page only has a single clip of the debate and then an article where an economist debunks Cruz' claims
I doubt it, because the pressures on this one are pretty unique.
But the more we can get fixed now, the less we have to do later.
This one didn't get hyped up, probably because the GOP hasn't actually presented an actual tax plan yet.
Has Trump said anything about the CA fires?
They're not the only game in town though. If that starts happening, we'll have a problem, but that problem isn't happening yet.
I love that Kellys defense of Trump is yet another example of Actually, he was trying to do the right thing but he is too dumb and incompetent so he fucked it up.
This is like the running excuse for Trump. Oh, he was trying to say this much better sounding thing, but like he is a shitty person/has Alzheimers/is a general idiot, so instead he said this similar, but very offensive thing.
Edit: and it should be obvious about Kelly being a piece of shit, remember when he was saying the immigration enforcement wouldnt be questioned?
That's the thing about control- would "labor" actually do a good job running things? Would you not just get a lot of people looking for "workerism"?
Like, I am not an entrepeneurial-minded person at all I don't have that insecurity or drive to expand. But it's good that there are people that do! And I wouldn't want them shackled to collective decision-making.
Paying someone for their time isn't exploitation! It's a trade!Those people will still be around. They'll just have to be answerable to the workers instead of exploiting them.
The thing about corporate consolidation is less about political influence and more about economic. Monopolies are super efficient in theory, but in practice the lack of incentive to invest in infrastructure and cut costs/improve services does drag things down a lot. Amazon makes things cheaper now but give it a couple decades and when they're the only game in town in fact rather than just in hype and I doubt it'll be nearly as true.
The ideal loop is probably break up giant corps -> allow to reform -> break them up again when efficiency stops dropping, tbh.
Paying someone for their time isn't exploitation! It's a trade!
I wonder if this can become a trend on moderate fixes to ACA.
So Kelly turned out to be a milkshake duck of the highest magnitude.
I thought he was a patriot doing his duty to prevent the orange monkey from pushing the nuke button.Kelly was never good
Kelly was never good
I love that Kellys defense of Trump is yet another example of Actually, he was trying to do the right thing but he is too dumb and incompetent so he fucked it up.
This is like the running excuse for Trump. Oh, he was trying to say this much better sounding thing, but like he is a shitty person/has Alzheimers/is a general idiot, so instead he said this similar, but very offensive thing.
Edit: and it should be obvious about Kelly being a piece of shit, remember when he was saying the immigration enforcement wouldnt be questioned?
Getty Images News (@GettyImagesNews)
A man wearing swastikas is punched at a protest against white nationalist #RichardSpencer https://t.co/NQx2rLelNW
The idea that because I pay someone to install a sink, they now own part of my house is very dumb to ne.Depends on their alternative. Although I know you support basic income.
Thats garnered the attention of city leaders, especially Mayor Michael Tubbs, who became the youngest-ever mayor of a medium-sized city when he won a landslide election in 2016. Tall, gregarious, often besuited with a trim beard, Tubbs could become the new face of universal basic income, or as people abbreviate it, UBI.
Stockton wont be the first UBI project in the Bay (pilots are already in the field in West Oakland and San Francisco), but it would be the first public attempt to show what a basic income can do for people. Unlike the secretive other projects, both the local government and the participants will be reporting what the cash does for them. And the project will be occurring within the context of a regular city government, with all the community engagement that entails.
The [UBI] conversation is not being had with the people who are going to be impacted, Tubbs said. Mark Zuckerberg dont need $500 a month.
Is that real? Because that guy looks like he's dressed like a parody of what a neonazi looks like with oversized home made swastika shirt and too wide red suspenders.
Kelly was never good
Just like George in BB all stars it's all about who last had his ear.John Harwood‏Verified account @JohnJHarwood 43s44 seconds ago
WH legislative director telling CNN that Trump doesn't support bipartisan Alexander-Murray health bill that Trump has said he supports
https://twitter.com/JohnJHarwood/status/921127411865063426