I believe it's a serious question but I'm not sure how to answer it!
My position is that Israel has no right to maintain the occupied territory in a state of occupation. If it is part of Israel, then the people in it are Israeli citizens with the right to safety, freedom from persecution, and democratic self-determination, as guaranteed by Israeli law. If it is not part of Israel, then it is its own country, and the people who reside there obviously have a right to govern themselves.
I don't really care which direction they go in. The people there may have an opinion. But I think international law, and Israeli law, really demands that one of the two be the case.