this cycle's Dan Quayle?DY_nasty said:Palin looks good...
Maybe too good.
this cycle's Dan Quayle?DY_nasty said:Palin looks good...
Maybe too good.
Cheebs said:I conclude either this will be INSANELY helpful to McCain or it will blowup in his face. I can't see this being a "do no harm" pick like Biden that has no effect on the race poll wise.
It will either lead him to winning, or lead him to losing badly.
I can't see this working out at all in the do no harm mold. It was a hail marry, but it's going to land on either extremes, not the middle.
Reagan did win the women vote when Mondale picked Ferarararrorororo, but Mondale would never have beat Reagan no matter the pick so I don't think that is comparable.
On November 5th we will look back at this day as either the day McCain began to win this race, or the day McCain made a major failure that lead to Obama running away with this thing.
ToyMachine228 said:Seriously, Hillary needs to be the attack dog against Palin, Biden can attack McCain, and Obama can set the stage for where he wants to take the country. That's a plan for victory in an election.
But he has become an anti-Bush campaigner. Perhaps he's learned something. But he is hard to pin down as the gay conservative.Tamanon said:I dunno, he's pretty conservative. He voted for Bush after all.:lol
speculawyer said:Yeah, it is totally different. It just leaps out as totally different:
Yeah that history of anti-athiesm posts you have and the lack of a smiley really makes one think it was obviously a joke.
sp0rsk said:
Yaweee said:Having a child with a disability shouldn't keep you from doing anything else with your life. She probably has some hired help.
speculawyer said:Complicated? You are divorcing my sister . . . I want you FIRED! Is that complicated?
scorcho said:this cycle's Dan Quayle?
Problem here is that Palin is very far right wing GOP.Cyan said:What a weird pick. Seems very risky, might not go over well with the base.
On the other hand, he could win over independents by looking more "maverick," and could win over some of the remaining bitter Hillary supporters who would otherwise have stayed home.
Hillary-"remember how I said the election's not about me? I lied, it is about me."PhoenixDark said:Why are people attacking the choice and her? She's got more executive experience than Obama and McCain
doesn't make her a good politician of course but jeez. I wonder how the PUMAs will take this. They clearly care more about Hillary than women's issues, so the possibility of this woman becoming the first female president could convince them to vote Obama....
Governor Palin is a tough executive who has demonstrated during her time in office that she is ready to be president. She has brought Republicans and Democrats together within her Administration and has a record of delivering on the change and reform that we need in Washington.
Governor Palin has challenged the influence of the big oil companies while fighting for the development of new energy resources. She leads a state that matters to every one of us -- Alaska has significant energy resources and she has been a leader in the fight to make America energy independent.
In Alaska, Governor Palin challenged a corrupt system and passed a landmark ethics reform bill. She has actually used her veto and cut budgetary spending. She put a stop to the "bridge to nowhere" that would have cost taxpayers $400 million dollars.
As the head of Alaska's National Guard and as the mother of a soldier herself, Governor Palin understands what it takes to lead our nation and she understands the importance of supporting our troops.
Governor Palin has the record of reform and bipartisanship that others can only speak of. Her experience in shaking up the status quo is exactly what is needed in Washington today.
So is Obama ready to be president now?Gaborn said:
Door2Dawn said:So is Obama ready to be president now?
Gaborn said:
BenjaminBirdie said:Andrew Sullivan:
Pretty much what I was thinking.
Schattenjagger said:i'd let her reform me in the sack
Tamanon said:That's a helluva lot of uses of the words "record" and "experience" for 2 years.:lol
Obama has 4 years of foreign policy experience. Palin has 0. There is no spin around that.Azrael said:The experience argument will not fly. Not only is it hypocritcal, but women will perceive any attack on Palin's qualifications by Democrats or the media in light of Obama's thin resume as sexist.
slidewinder said:I am totally ready to step up and nail (have sex with) Sarah Palin to save our country. The rest of you pussies can organize a circle-jerk amongst yourselves.
PhatSaqs said:"...who has demonstrated during her time in office that she is ready to be president"
He went there :lol
You don't attack her. You attack Mccain for questioning Obama's experience. There is a subtle difference that undermines a lot of what you are saying.Azrael said:The experience argument will not fly. Not only is it hypocritcal, but women will perceive any attack on Palin's qualifications by Democrats or the media in light of Obama's thin resume as sexist.
Do you really want her to be a heartbeat away from presidency?ToxicAdam said:VP's are meaningless, until they make gaffes (ie. Quayle, Stockdale).
It's nice to see McCain fighting and actually trying to win, unlike Dole in 96 who just rolled over.
Wow . . . I've got two people now trying to control my speech now.Basch said:Seriously, don't mention this ever again, unless you want to look bad.
you mean flagpole!Gaborn said:Hell, I'd let Obama show me his American Flag, but that's a separate issue.
Well, it looks like McCain is already preemptively attacking the "Palin has no experience just like Obama" angle. It will be interesting to see if that works.Gaborn said:
Bad pick confirmed.ToxicAdam said:VP's are meaningless, until they make gaffes (ie. Quayle, Stockdale).
pxleyes said:So what is Palin's record on the war on terror? Did she fight the good fight against those rogue polar bears? Maybe those vampires during those 30 days of night?
Steve Youngblood said:I keep listening to the arguments (and even participating a little), and I really can't seem to reach a conclusion here. Honestly, for one moment, I'm taking off my partisan hat and just looking at it as a spectator.
Good or bad, smart or silly, all I can say is that this is a very interesting pick.
Schattenjagger said:you mean flagpole!
Odrion said:The more I hear about her the more I think this is a good move for Democrats.
But my god she is so fucking hot. Not just normal hot but extremely fucking fetishy hot
She's the one who's been shipping polar bears off to the Dharma Initiative to use for slave labor.pxleyes said:So what is Palin's record on the war on terror? Did she fight the good fight against those rogue polar bears? Maybe those vampires during those 30 days of night?
omg rite said:Okay for real, how is this woman "hot"?
Odrion said:The more I hear about her the more I think this is a good move for Democrats.
But my god she is so fucking hot. Not just normal hot but extremely fucking fetishy hot
HolyStar said:Please keep creationist/atheist/religion bashing out of this thread. About 50% of American's are creationists her being a creationist will affect none of the voters the republicans are trying to gain. And yes I know why people are against creationists this is Gaf every 10 threads is about this topic or something simillar.