RubxQub said:He loses at life. Something about his voice infuriates me.
It's the eyes I can't stand. Those beady little eyes.
RubxQub said:He loses at life. Something about his voice infuriates me.
Y2Kev said:What a joke he is :lol
I love when he goes on Bill Maher and the audience laughs at him.
he get paid for thisIncognito said:Here's the aforementioned video of Joe Scarborough thoroughly embarrassing himself this morning. He had to be drunk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJeY6laCfVY
BenjaminBirdie said:I always set my barometer to the audience on Bill Maher. I find his barely veiled disgust of them to be quite the vote of confidence.
It definitely provided 3x the number of facts.reilo said:Doesn't the Daily Show bring in 3x the ratings that the O'Reilly Factor does?
GhaleonEB said:PPP has McCain leading Obama by only three in North Carolina. Poll is of likely voters. Obama gets 84% of the black vote; I think that might be understating his support here a touch.
They also have Hagen beating Dole by three now.
http://www.pollster.com/blogs/poll_ppp_north_carolina_82023.php
ViperVisor said:His network is like Real Time now. Which is awesome. Scarbs came out of his safe place that is Morning Joe and got verbally slapped by Keith just yesterday. And Maddow will pwn at a moments notice.
That's what you get for linking to 'Newsbusters'. What's next? Worldnetdaily? NewsMax?siamesedreamer said:Bah...that's what I get for linking a news story that's a few days old.
speculawyer said:That's what you get for linking to 'Newsbusters'. What's next? Worldnetdaily? NewsMax?
hey, we need GOP talking points and false outrage from somewhere. i would prefer NRO since JLo's missives are so cute.speculawyer said:That's what you get for linking to 'Newsbusters'. What's next? Worldnetdaily? NewsMax?
speculawyer said:That's what you get for linking to 'Newsbusters'. What's next? Worldnetdaily? NewsMax?
What's the R analog to TPM?scorcho said:the difference between TPM and NewsBusters is more than just ideological leanings...
siamesedreamer said:FWIW, I honestly had never heard of Newsbusters before I read that article this weekend.
Carry on though...
wouldn't know, but it definitely ain't newsbusters (which is more akin to mediamatters)APF said:What's the R analog to TPM?
siamesedreamer said:FWIW, I honestly had never heard of Newsbusters before I read that article this weekend.
Carry on though...
Incognito said:Here's the aforementioned video of Joe Scarborough thoroughly embarrassing himself this morning. He had to be drunk.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJeY6laCfVY
NBCs First Read reported yesterday that the McCain campaign will be prepared to show McCain's home in Hanoi by using images of his cell. They claim they have not overused the POW element and insist they have underused it."
I think your attempt to equate what Carville and I were saying in those instances is more than a bit of a stretch and actually kind of bizarre. In fact, the rest of your post supports the idea that these speeches in themselves are not prime vote getters--they're "introductions" and "warmups." Further, I don't know how many conventions you've been attentive to, but like debates and other political spectacles the way they shape popular opinion has an enormous amount to do with snapshots, soundbytes, and the post-event narrative. This is why they have the kids come out, why the nominee gives his wife a labored awkward kiss, etc.PhoenixDark said:Carville is wrong. The first night was for definition and re-introduction. Yesterday APF said he thought the Obama kids were the only vote getters of the night, and that mindset is similar to what Carville was saying.
fucking hell, im ready to say that he being a POW means jack shit to this country if he is willing to shit on it as much as he is.maynerd said:Break out the POW images folks...
maynerd said:Break out the POW images folks...
hay guise wats going on in heremaynerd said:Break out the POW images folks...
Crooks&Liars said:As seen on the I-94 greeting motorists arriving from the Minneapolis/St. Paul airport, home to the Republican National Convention
APF said:I think your attempt to equate what Carville and I were saying in those instances is more than a bit of a stretch and actually kind of bizarre. In fact, the rest of your post supports the idea that these speeches in themselves are not prime vote getters--they're "introductions" and "warmups." Further, I don't know how many conventions you've been attentive to, but like debates and other political spectacles the way they shape popular opinion has an enormous amount to do with snapshots, soundbytes, and the post-event narrative. This is why they have the kids come out, why the nominee gives his wife a labored awkward kiss, etc.
People still don't know who Barack Obama really is.mckmas8808 said:So when is Obama ever suppose to answer the dumbest fucing question in American History? Which is who is Barack Obama?
GhaleonEB said:Heh. McCain just pulled ahead in Gallup's tracking by two, first time since Obama won the nomination. Rasmussen dropped from Obama +3 to tied again. It's too early for any bounce effect, but it should make for an interesting news cycle.
GhaleonEB said:Heh. McCain just pulled ahead in Gallup's tracking by two, first time since Obama won the nomination. Rasmussen dropped from Obama +3 to tied again. It's too early for any bounce effect, but it should make for an interesting news cycle.
GhaleonEB said:Heh. McCain just pulled ahead in Gallup's tracking by two, first time since Obama won the nomination. Rasmussen dropped from Obama +3 to tied again. It's too early for any bounce effect, but it should make for an interesting news cycle.
ShOcKwAvE said:I still think the first debate will set everything right and McCain will look terrible next to him.
(que requiem for a dream music and a montage of various people puking)Deus Ex Machina said:
Remember Gore/Bush? Expectations were set with Gore being a great debater. The media concluded Bush won because of mannerisms, make-up and head shaking.Agent Icebeezy said:This is the hope.
GhaleonEB said:Remember Gore/Bush? Expectations were set with Gore being a great debater. The media concluded Bush won because of mannerisms, make-up and head shaking.
Obama will not "win" the debates in the media. It's like how people expected McCain to get scrutiny after Hillary dropped out - and they are literally covering for him. They will do the same in the debates. And for the record, I'm not expecting any convention bounce for Obama in the national polling - maybe a point or two, at best.
I still think he'll win by a huge electoral margin. But people looking to national polls or the media for comfort are going to be increasingly upset.
Karma Kramer said:This is not good that Obama didn't get a bounce from Biden... its going to drive a bad narrative on the media.
I'd rather you get thrown under first.siamesedreamer said:Time to throw Biden under the bus? Can you do that?
maynerd said:Break out the POW images folks...